On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Karsten Hilbert
karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
would be happy to package it for Debian.
May I kindly suggest -- if
Hello Andreas, Karsten,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Karsten,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:08:36PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Karsten Hilbert
karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
May I kindly suggest -- if there's a choice to be had -- that
you might consider choosing PostgreSQL as the backend, which,
among those
DbaseIII, MySQL, Postgres and SqLite
listed here
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:02:32AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
BTW DCMTK has been compiled and tested with hardening flags and proven
to work very well, it is a very robust and mature SCP server.
Sure... right now anyone looking for a DICOM server should go to DCMTK before
ConQuest.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Karsten Hilbert
karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:02:32AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
BTW DCMTK has been compiled and tested with hardening flags and proven
to work very well, it is a very robust and mature SCP server.
Sure...
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
BTW DCMTK has been compiled and tested with hardening flags and proven
to work very well, it is a very robust and mature SCP server.
Sure... right now anyone looking for a DICOM server should go to DCMTK
before
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
There is no
$ apt-get install dcmtk-pacs
$ mc -e /etc/dcmtk-pacs/pacs.conf
...
$ dcmtk-pacs --import /all/our/current/dicom/images/
$ ginkgocadx
I personnaly use:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:41:04AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
I personnaly use:
$ apt-get install dcmtk
$ vim /etc/dcmtk/dcmqrscp.cfg
$ storescu LOCAL 1234 +r /all/our/current/dicom/images/
$ ginkgocadx
Hmmm, that looks promising to me.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:41:04AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
I personnaly use:
$ apt-get install dcmtk
$ vim /etc/dcmtk/dcmqrscp.cfg
$ storescu LOCAL 1234 +r /all/our/current/dicom/images/
$ ginkgocadx
Hmmm, that looks promising to me.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
I personnaly use:
$ apt-get install dcmtk
$ vim /etc/dcmtk/dcmqrscp.cfg
$ storescu LOCAL 1234 +r /all/our/current/dicom/images/
$ ginkgocadx
Hmmm, that looks promising to
Dear all,
Perhaps you could give a look at Orthanc [1], that is a lightweight
DICOM store that is built on the top of DCMTK, that is already packaged
into Debian [2], and that is known to work in combination with Ginkgo
CADx since release 0.7.0 [3].
The distribution of Orthanc contains a
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Perhaps you could give a look at Orthanc [1], that is a lightweight
DICOM store that is built on the top of DCMTK, that is already
packaged into Debian [2], and that is known to work in combination
with Ginkgo CADx since
This is your Jan 2013 answer to my inquiry on just that:
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:05:52 +0100
From: Sebastien Jodogne s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be
To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orthanc 0.5.0
Would you mind giving some hints as to best
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:56:21PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Perhaps you could give a look at Orthanc [1], that is a lightweight
DICOM store that is built on the top of DCMTK, that is already
packaged into Debian [2], and that is known to work in combination
with Ginkgo CADx
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:39:27PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Attached the /etc/orthanc/orthanc.json.
Inline, as attachments are not allowed:
{
/**
* General configuration of Orthanc
**/
// The logical name of this instance of Orthanc. This one is
// displayed in Orthanc
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
I do not have this missing symbol problem on my Debian unstable box
(x86_64 architecture). It is defined by the shared library
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglog.so.0.0.0 from the
libgoogle-glog0 package (version 0.3.3-1).
I do not have this missing symbol problem on my Debian unstable box
(x86_64 architecture). It is defined by the shared library
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglog.so.0.0.0 from the
libgoogle-glog0 package (version 0.3.3-1).
Upgrading the package to the 0.3.3 unstable version fixed the
startup
Is there a way to run Orthanc withOUT it listening as a web server ?
(IOW as a pure DICOM server)
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a minor development
that I plan to ship in the next release of Orthanc.
Hi Sebastien,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:40:39PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
I do not have this missing symbol problem on my Debian unstable box
(x86_64 architecture). It is defined by the shared library
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglog.so.0.0.0 from the
libgoogle-glog0 package (version
Is there a way to run Orthanc withOUT it listening as a web server ?
(IOW as a pure DICOM server)
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a minor development
that I plan to ship in the next release of Orthanc.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your feedback! I have just fixed the package by
introducing a minimal version for Google Log [1].
Thanks for the quick fix. Perhaps it might make sense to send a bug
report to BTS anyway to let other potential users know and upload the
package fixing this bug.
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:25:34PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Yes, as written on Twitter [1], this status changed on November 2013
with the release of Orthanc 0.7.0. The information above relates to
Orthanc 0.5.0.
There is a FAQ entry to help you link Orthanc to Ginkgo CADx [1]. If
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:13:46PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a minor development
that I plan to ship in the next release of Orthanc.
In the meantime, disabling
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:05:45PM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
Is there a way to run Orthanc withOUT it listening as a web server ?
(IOW as a pure DICOM server)
This is the first time this feature is requested. I have just added a
card in our roadmap to keep track of it [1]. This is a
Hi Pablo,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
Hello fellows,
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
would be happy to package it for Debian.
I've seen previous works on the package (and the SVN tree), and bug 680352. I
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
would be happy to package it for Debian.
Most brilliant. A fully functional DICOM server is what Debian (Med)
desperately needs.
Any chance I can
Hi Karsten,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:08:36PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
would be happy to package it for Debian.
Most brilliant. A fully
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00:49AM -0200, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
My name is Pablo Lorenzzoni. I am currently using ConQuest DICOM server and
would be happy to package it for Debian.
May I kindly suggest -- if there's a choice to be had -- that
you might consider choosing PostgreSQL as the
29 matches
Mail list logo