On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark !
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Mark Longair
Josh,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Josh Moore j...@glencoesoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Josh Moore j...@glencoesoftware.com wrote:
switch (e.g. ant -Ddebian=true) to allow these commits to live in the
mainline? (Would the jars be allowed to remain unused, or must they be
deleted to adhere to the Debian guidelines?)
Missed that one. Yes we are
Mathieu,
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Josh,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Josh Moore j...@glencoesoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark !
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
[..]
NetCDF Java itself also bundles a huge number
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:08:41AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
What is left to do, is go over each file, and check all possible
license. I found some apache license for examples.
Has anyone seen such
Hi Mark,
It is great to see Fiji approaching
On 01/07/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Longair wrote:
I was very happy about your proposal to start a rearrangement of
Fiji that is DFSG compliant. In parallel to that, I would like to discuss
the possibility to upload more or less what you have with
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
[..]
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:06:46PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
[...]
* I've tried as far as possible to replace components from Fiji
with
Hi Steffen,
(I should apologise for everyone for my late replies to this
thread - I've only recently had time to make substantive
progress on this.)
Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
On 11/03/2011 09:06 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14
Hello,
On 11/03/2011 09:06 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, I believe that my current approach to creating
the Fiji Debian packages is the wrong one, and it might be worth
taking a
[Maintainer of 3rd party Fiji Debian package in CC
Mark, at the Debian Med list we are currently discussing ImageJ /
Fiji issues which might be interesting for you. The discussion
might be interesting for your from here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2011/11/msg0.html
]
On Tue, Nov
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Mark Longair
mark-debianli...@longair.net wrote:
[...]
It's been a long term aim of mine to get (at least some of) Fiji
into Debian, and in fact I've intermittently discussed this with
Steffen Möller.
Ok that's great news !
Unfortunately, I believe
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:57:35AM +0100, Johan Henriksson wrote:
In the future, I hope one of these imagej debian packages will
finally disappear, and I would prefer it to be the debian med imagej. It
simply cannot compete with FIJI in terms of support.
As far as I know there is exactly one
fiji is being maintained in a 3rd party repository:
http://fiji.sc/wiki/index.php/Downloads
There is only one imagej debian package and it is based on the original
imagej from http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/
and lacks all the extras that fiji includes. in particular, the fiji
package is very up to
with Johan Henriksson who has been
generating debian builds in the past.
indeed !
What do you mean with main class? MMCoreJ.jar contains the Micro-Manager
Core (written in C++) translated to Java by Swig. It is not an application
in itself, you could think about it as a library. The Micro
What do you mean with main class? MMCoreJ.jar contains the
Micro-Manager Core (written in C++) translated to Java by Swig. It is
not an application in itself, you could think about it as a library. The
Micro-Manager user interface is contained in MMJ_.jar.
Here is what get when I try
not contains the main class. I am
looking for feedback and possibly help to finish this package.
I assume that you are in contact with Johan Henriksson who has been generating
debian builds in the past.
What do you mean with main class? MMCoreJ.jar contains the Micro-Manager
Core (written in C
Il giorno lun, 19/01/2009 alle 17.34 +0100, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
Perhaps somebody from the Debian Med project might be able to
increase the preasure from an additional side.
yes this was the idea of my post, just to add mass to reach the critical
mass but maybe as Johan is writing is
Hi *
after Imagej, could you fill this software is interesting :
http://www.micro-manager.org/
is an Open Source software package for imaging and control of automated
microscopes, shutters, cameras and so on.
In the case we could start to make a Micro-Manager.deb
hth
paolo
--
NeuroScience
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Paolo Ariano wrote:
after Imagej, could you fill this software is interesting :
http://www.micro-manager.org/
is an Open Source software package for imaging and control of automated
microscopes, shutters, cameras and so on.
That's interesting. I just added the
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Johan Henriksson wrote:
http://mahogny.areta.org/temp/debs/
and here it is. I'm actually maintaining the linux port. unfortunately
there is a pile of dirty licenses involved so I'm not sure this is ready
for debian yet. for example, some of the code cannot be given out and
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Johan Henriksson wrote:
http://mahogny.areta.org/temp/debs/
and here it is. I'm actually maintaining the linux port. unfortunately
there is a pile of dirty licenses involved so I'm not sure this is ready
for debian yet. for example, some of the code
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Johan Henriksson wrote:
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/imaging.html#micromanager
Please verify that the information is correct and reflects the current
state of our knowledge. I would like to discuss two questions:
this is correct
Thanks.
1. Is there a
2. Anybody willing to ask upstream to clean up their licenses?
you can't imagine how much pressure we are putting on the responsible
companies. unfortunately their IP lawyers haven't given up yet. they
want to make sure the control codes are not given out. some of the
hardware has to be
24 matches
Mail list logo
