On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:06:09PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> You mean on wiki.debian.org, I presume.
Yes.
> The detailed descriptions of the projects should
> indeed be on the wiki. And their reference from Debian Med ... hm ... could
> be there, too.
> It is a matter of taste, I think.
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:09:59PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> Do I hear some "yip, this will help us, go ahead" somewhere?
>
> Why don't you start on a Wiki what you are proposing?
You mean on wiki.debian.org, I presume. The detailed descriptions of the
projects shou
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:09:59PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Do I hear some "yip, this will help us, go ahead" somewhere?
Why don't you start on a Wiki what you are proposing?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmachen zum Ă„ndern!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m
Hello again,
I'd be interested to see the packages listed that we are working on (on varying
degrees of
activity) as a community. Those projects don't necessarily have produced any
packages yet,
but they eventually should. What comes to mind are
* getData - the automated installation of bioinf
4 matches
Mail list logo