Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

Thanks to all for the helpful comments. We'll look into bundling it with the circlator source package until the necessary components officially get merged into circlator. regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name

Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

m bio_assembly_refinement. Looking into it, I'm wondering >>>>whether >>>> this is a tool that will just get folded into circlator eventually. Do >>>> you think it's worth packaging it separately? >>> I should add that the alternative would be t

Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

as whether it's worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement /separately/. Yes, I noticed the dependency on bio_assembly_refinement as well and I was’t sure what part of it is really needed, since it’s description sounded a bit similar to Circlator itself. I didn’t have the time yet to look

Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

ded into circlator eventually. Do >> you think it's worth packaging it separately? > > I should add that the alternative would be to bundle it into the > circlator package as a multi-orig tarball. The question is better > rephrased as whether it's worth packaging bio_assembly_refine

Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

> you think it's worth packaging it separately? > I should add that the alternative would be to bundle it into the circlator package as a multi-orig tarball. The question is better rephrased as whether it's worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement /separately/. Thanks and regards Afif -- Afi

Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

Hi, Sascha, I'm looking into packaging Circlator, which depends on the Sanger program bio_assembly_refinement. Looking into it, I'm wondering whether this is a tool that will just get folded into circlator eventually. Do you think it's worth packaging it separately? Thanks and regards Afif --