Re: uploading to proposed-updates

2000-10-22 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > hi, > > i have a bugreport for a package which is solved in a new > version. and the bug report told me that it is fixed in the new > package. it's a woody package but compiled for potato but > shouldn't be a problem because it onl

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Steve Dobson wrote: > > > dh_testdir > > > mkdir option1-build-dir > > > cd option1-build-dir > > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE) > > > cd .. > > > > Only you can't have cd's on separate lines, be

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Steve Dobson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:13:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > dh_testdir > > mkdir option1-build-dir > > cd option1-build-dir > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE) > > cd .

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations), > > > >

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Steve Dobson wrote: > > > dh_testdir > > > mkdir option1-build-dir > > > cd option1-build-dir > > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE) > > > cd .. > > > > Only you can't have cd's on separate lines, b

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Steve Dobson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:13:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > dh_testdir > > mkdir option1-build-dir > > cd option1-build-dir > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE) > > cd

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two location

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations), > > >

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20001021T205917+0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > I have made a package with debhelper and dh_make, which produces a single > binary deb. However, now I would like to make two binaries from the same > packages, identical except for that each is built with different options > to configure (one has suppo

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locatio

Re: Installing files in /etc

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:46:18PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > debian/rules: > > > make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp > > > > BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/ > > Why not just > > make install DESTDIR=debian/tmp > > ? I've never understood why an absolute path is needed for that command. It's

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations), Well, it's simple reall

Re: Installing files in /etc

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:44:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > > debian/rules: > > > make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp > > > > BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/ > > Uhm, why? Because using back quotes will fork for another shell command, whereas CURDIR is a pre-made make variable holding the same t

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20001021T205917+0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > I have made a package with debhelper and dh_make, which produces a single > binary deb. However, now I would like to make two binaries from the same > packages, identical except for that each is built with different options > to configure (one has supp

Re: Installing files in /etc

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:46:18PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > debian/rules: > > > make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp > > > > BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/ > > Why not just > > make install DESTDIR=debian/tmp > > ? I've never understood why an absolute path is needed for that command. It's

Re: Making a package with multiple binaries

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations), Well, it's simple real

Re: Installing files in /etc

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:44:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > > debian/rules: > > > make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp > > > > BTW s/`pwd`/$(CURDIR)/ > > Uhm, why? Because using back quotes will fork for another shell command, whereas CURDIR is a pre-made make variable holding the same