On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:41:48AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Taral dijo:
> > Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone
> > else
> > check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #... statements?)
>
> I guess it should. Does it close any bugs?
> If it doesn't, wh
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-2001 Sam TH wrote:
> > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It prod
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:58:36AM -0500, Nuria Lope Gil wrote:
>
> I new, and I need to install Debian in my PC. I have downloaded all files I need,
>so now I have to generate disks for installation.
> I would be very please if someone could explain me how to do it, and the first
>step whe
I new, and I need to install Debian in my PC. I have downloaded all files I need, so
now I have to generate disks for installation.
I would be very please if someone could explain me how to do it, and the first step
when installing.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:01:15PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and
> > > got
> > > zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything
> > > even close, but it makes a bit of a mess.
> > If you wa
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:41:48AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Taral dijo:
> > Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone else
> > check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #... statements?)
>
> I guess it should. Does it close any bugs?
> If it doesn't, why ar
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 23-Feb-2001 Sam TH wrote:
> > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It pro
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:01:15PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> > > zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything
> > > even close, but it makes a bit of a mess.
> > If you want to
Taral dijo:
> Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone else
> check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #... statements?)
I guess it should. Does it close any bugs?
If it doesn't, why are you uploading it?
--
If you don't spend energy getting what yo
On 23-Feb-2001 Amaya wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
>> how will this affect current users of your package? when they upgrade, will
>> they lose all of their old settings?
>
> Of course not! ;-) I'd just move them to the new location.
> But, I'm starting to think this is not a good idea, mayb
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
> how will this affect current users of your package? when they upgrade, will
> they lose all of their old settings?
Of course not! ;-) I'd just move them to the new location.
But, I'm starting to think this is not a good idea, maybe.
--
If you don't spend energy get
>> Problem is, you can only declare a conffile if it is in your package. So you
>> new package has /etc/package/foo and it used to be /etc/foo. What happens
>> to
>> /etc/foo? What happens to its configuration changes the admin made?
>
> Let's just move conffiles to the new location then... I ha
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
> it is difficult to move conffiles, why do you think they should be in
> /etc/my_package?
I just think it's cleaner.
> Problem is, you can only declare a conffile if it is in your package. So you
> new package has /etc/package/foo and it used to be /etc/foo. What happe
> The reason one might need to recompile might be that
> glibc2.1 had a bug which was fixed in 2.2. You don't want the package
> to be rebuilt on every other architecture, just because of that.
In that case, wouldn't you want to add an architecture-specific
build-depends on glibc2.2, so I don't a
Taral dijo:
> Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone else
> check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #... statements?)
I guess it should. Does it close any bugs?
If it doesn't, why are you uploading it?
--
If you don't spend energy getting what y
Hi!
I did not receive any mails from debian-devel since 10'th Februar. Archive
(updated 23'th Feb) contains messages up to 8'th Feb. What is wrong with this
list?
Ryszard Lach.
--
Internet Designers S.A.
tel. (071) 35 00 445 wew. 25
http://www.id.pl
pgpCBLQjbGdtG.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
I am attempting to package a simple Squid redirector. To have any
function whatsoever, a directive must be inserted into squid.conf
declaring it as a redirector. I had envisioned a nice debconf question
showing the line that would be inserted and asking for the admin's
permission to do so.
It seem
On 23-Feb-2001 Amaya wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
>> how will this affect current users of your package? when they upgrade, will
>> they lose all of their old settings?
>
> Of course not! ;-) I'd just move them to the new location.
> But, I'm starting to think this is not a good idea, may
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
> how will this affect current users of your package? when they upgrade, will
> they lose all of their old settings?
Of course not! ;-) I'd just move them to the new location.
But, I'm starting to think this is not a good idea, maybe.
--
If you don't spend energy ge
On 23-Feb-2001 Amaya wrote:
> I have recently adopted a package that places two conffiles in /etc/
> I think that it would be more appropiate to place them under /etc/my_package/
> I need some help regarding how to do it and if it should be done at all.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
it is diff
I have recently adopted a package that places two conffiles in /etc/
I think that it would be more appropiate to place them under /etc/my_package/
I need some help regarding how to do it and if it should be done at all.
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
If you don't spend energy getting what you wan
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" wrote:
> > I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
> > package: I add harmonics data to the package that are otherwise
> > downloaded manually from the author's web site (it was packaged
> > this way when I adopted it). Since the xtide software itself
>
> I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
> package: I add harmonics data to the package that are otherwise
> downloaded manually from the author's web site (it was packaged
> this way when I adopted it). Since the xtide software itself and
> the harmonics data are updated
[I sent this to -devel yesterday morning and got no replies.
Thought I'd try here. I'm pretty much decided to go with option
#1 below, but welcome advice.]
I'm seeking a bit of advice about an upcoming package split.
I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
package: I add
Yes, you should check the wnpp page http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index
to make sure no one else is already working on it, then announce you
intent to package by filing a wishlist bug against wnpp as per the
instructions in the developers reference (which you should read :).
> Hi!
>
> I would
>> Problem is, you can only declare a conffile if it is in your package. So you
>> new package has /etc/package/foo and it used to be /etc/foo. What happens
>> to
>> /etc/foo? What happens to its configuration changes the admin made?
>
> Let's just move conffiles to the new location then... I h
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry dijo:
> it is difficult to move conffiles, why do you think they should be in
> /etc/my_package?
I just think it's cleaner.
> Problem is, you can only declare a conffile if it is in your package. So you
> new package has /etc/package/foo and it used to be /etc/foo. What happ
Hi!
I would like to debianize mod_gzip requested 5 days ago. Since I'm not an
official debian maintainer (yet) I'll probably need a sponsor for this package
(any volunteers ?). Should/can I submit a bug announcing my intention ?
Richard.
--
Internet Designers S.A.
tel. (071) 35 00 445 wew. 25
> The reason one might need to recompile might be that
> glibc2.1 had a bug which was fixed in 2.2. You don't want the package
> to be rebuilt on every other architecture, just because of that.
In that case, wouldn't you want to add an architecture-specific
build-depends on glibc2.2, so I don't
Hi!
I did not receive any mails from debian-devel since 10'th Februar. Archive
(updated 23'th Feb) contains messages up to 8'th Feb. What is wrong with this
list?
Ryszard Lach.
--
Internet Designers S.A.
tel. (071) 35 00 445 wew. 25
http://www.id.pl
PGP signature
I am attempting to package a simple Squid redirector. To have any
function whatsoever, a directive must be inserted into squid.conf
declaring it as a redirector. I had envisioned a nice debconf question
showing the line that would be inserted and asking for the admin's
permission to do so.
It see
On 23-Feb-2001 Amaya wrote:
> I have recently adopted a package that places two conffiles in /etc/
> I think that it would be more appropiate to place them under /etc/my_package/
> I need some help regarding how to do it and if it should be done at all.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
it is dif
I have recently adopted a package that places two conffiles in /etc/
I think that it would be more appropiate to place them under /etc/my_package/
I need some help regarding how to do it and if it should be done at all.
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
If you don't spend energy getting what you wa
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" wrote:
> > I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
> > package: I add harmonics data to the package that are otherwise
> > downloaded manually from the author's web site (it was packaged
> > this way when I adopted it). Since the xtide software itself
>
> I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
> package: I add harmonics data to the package that are otherwise
> downloaded manually from the author's web site (it was packaged
> this way when I adopted it). Since the xtide software itself and
> the harmonics data are update
[I sent this to -devel yesterday morning and got no replies.
Thought I'd try here. I'm pretty much decided to go with option
#1 below, but welcome advice.]
I'm seeking a bit of advice about an upcoming package split.
I maintain the xtide package. Currently, it's not a pristine
package: I ad
Yes, you should check the wnpp page http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index
to make sure no one else is already working on it, then announce you
intent to package by filing a wishlist bug against wnpp as per the
instructions in the developers reference (which you should read :).
> Hi!
>
> I would
Hi!
I would like to debianize mod_gzip requested 5 days ago. Since I'm not an
official debian maintainer (yet) I'll probably need a sponsor for this package
(any volunteers ?). Should/can I submit a bug announcing my intention ?
Richard.
--
Internet Designers S.A.
tel. (071) 35 00 445 wew. 25
On 23-Feb-2001 Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new revision of the gnome-utils package.
> It includes an additional manual page and installs more
> documentation into the doc/gnome-utils/ directory.
> I would be glad if anybody would look at this and
> upload it if it's ok.
>
> Jo
> I have prepared ...
Oh, I forgot. The package is at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/gnome-utils/
Jochen
pgpLFoJqyx2FH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I have prepared a new revision of the gnome-utils package.
It includes an additional manual page and installs more
documentation into the doc/gnome-utils/ directory.
I would be glad if anybody would look at this and
upload it if it's ok.
Jochen
--
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/vo
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > It's missing build-dependencies.
>
> Added. However, is there a good way to check build-depends, or do you
> just have to guess?
There are some tools discussed on debian-devel that help
finding dependencies, search the archive for them. The most
predictable way, tho
>
> Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and
> want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the
> Debian revision number for this (to avoid possible confusion)
> or should I just replace my files with new version (to keep
> the revision numbers of official versions contiguous
Hi,
last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package
and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was
not uploaded to the server.
Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and
want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the
Debian revision number for th
On 23-Feb-2001 Sam TH wrote:
> I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
> warnings with lintian.
>
> The package is uf-view, and i
* (Colin Watson)
| Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
| >testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
| >saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
| >
| >So - what to do? Package bsh myse
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> > On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
>
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
>testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
>saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
>
>So - what to do? Package bsh myself?
It's in unstable, it's jus
Title:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no error
On 23-Feb-2001 Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new revision of the gnome-utils package.
> It includes an additional manual page and installs more
> documentation into the doc/gnome-utils/ directory.
> I would be glad if anybody would look at this and
> upload it if it's ok.
>
> J
> I have prepared ...
Oh, I forgot. The package is at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/gnome-utils/
Jochen
PGP signature
Hi,
I have prepared a new revision of the gnome-utils package.
It includes an additional manual page and installs more
documentation into the doc/gnome-utils/ directory.
I would be glad if anybody would look at this and
upload it if it's ok.
Jochen
--
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/v
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > It's missing build-dependencies.
>
> Added. However, is there a good way to check build-depends, or do you
> just have to guess?
There are some tools discussed on debian-devel that help
finding dependencies, search the archive for them. The most
predictable way, th
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
> warnings with lintian.
>
> The package is uf-view, and it's
I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
So - what to do? Package bsh myself?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about
>
> Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and
> want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the
> Debian revision number for this (to avoid possible confusion)
> or should I just replace my files with new version (to keep
> the revision numbers of official versions contiguou
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bug#86243)
> # cd ..
> # ls
> sntop-1.3.1/ sntop-1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
rename this to sntop_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz (note the underscore)
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/
Hi,
last week I prepared a new package for the gnome-utils package
and asked for a sponsor. As nobody volunteered this one was
not uploaded to the server.
Now I did some additional fixes (add a man page, ...) and
want to prepare a new package. Should I increase the
Debian revision number for t
Hi,
Regarding [0]sntop
I'm trying to close [1]Bug #86243. I only need to change an option to
fping from -b 12 to -b 24 and the package will compile and work on
Alpha. This is what I do.
I do the canges to the sntop source.
# cd sntop-1.3.1
# dch -i
Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bu
On 23-Feb-2001 Sam TH wrote:
> I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
> warnings with lintian.
>
> The package is uf-view, and
* (Colin Watson)
| Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
| >testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
| >saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
| >
| >So - what to do? Package bsh mys
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> > On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
>
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
>testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
>saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
>
>So - what to do? Package bsh myself?
It's in unstable, it's ju
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> > I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> > package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> > make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no erro
On 02/23/01 Sam TH wrote:
> I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
> package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
> make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
> warnings with lintian.
>
> The package is uf-view, and it's
I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
warnings with lintian.
The package is uf-view, and it's a GNOME based viewer for the User
Frie
I took over jde some time ago. jde depends on bsh. bsh exists in
testing, but not in unstable, apparently (since I got a bug report
saying that I depended on a non-existant package).
So - what to do? Package bsh myself?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective abou
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bug#86243)
> # cd ..
> # ls
> sntop-1.3.1/ sntop-1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
rename this to sntop_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz (note the underscore)
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k
Hi,
Regarding [0]sntop
I'm trying to close [1]Bug #86243. I only need to change an option to
fping from -b 12 to -b 24 and the package will compile and work on
Alpha. This is what I do.
I do the canges to the sntop source.
# cd sntop-1.3.1
# dch -i
Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: B
On vie, feb 23, 2001 at 01:55:58 -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> Make sure you're using -k
> correctly.
0:-)
Thank you, RTFM->man debuild.
--
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/4EB82468
1C2A 0241 D350 B43D E027 4FCD F8E8 3454 4EB8 2468
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:47:32PM +0100, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> Hello, I can't sign the file .dsc of a new package I'm makeing because
> debsign says:
>
> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: Secret key no available
> /usr/bin/debsign: GPG error occurred!
>
> I can sign my e-mail messages
Hello, I can't sign the file .dsc of a new package I'm makeing because
debsign says:
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: Secret key no available
/usr/bin/debsign: GPG error occurred!
I can sign my e-mail messages with gpg, my ~/.gnupg has the files needed,
what I doing wrong please?.
Thank you.
--
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> All help, suggestions, comments, much appreciated. Thanks
Please read the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" at [1]. That's a good
written tutorial for beginners and reading it should answer your
questions.
> Holgar Ostermann
cu
Adrian
[1] http:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
[...]
> Second question, when using dpkg-buildpackage, it creates the diff. But when
> I've changed a few files (such as .c ones) and have so
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:31:52 -0800
> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Manfred Wassmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: debhelper and multiple README files
>
> Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> > Well, I'm not tha
I'm an illustrious member of the NM queue, and have completed a
package that I would be very grateful if people would check for me, to
make sure that I haven't missed anything. It produces no errors or
warnings with lintian.
The package is uf-view, and it's a GNOME based viewer for the User
Fri
On vie, feb 23, 2001 at 01:55:58 -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> Make sure you're using -k
> correctly.
0:-)
Thank you, RTFM->man debuild.
--
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/4EB82468
1C2A 0241 D350 B43D E027 4FCD F8E8 3454 4EB8 2468
--
To
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:47:32PM +0100, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
> Hello, I can't sign the file .dsc of a new package I'm makeing because
> debsign says:
>
> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: Secret key no available
> /usr/bin/debsign: GPG error occurred!
>
> I can sign my e-mail message
Hello, I can't sign the file .dsc of a new package I'm makeing because
debsign says:
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: Secret key no available
/usr/bin/debsign: GPG error occurred!
I can sign my e-mail messages with gpg, my ~/.gnupg has the files needed,
what I doing wrong please?.
Thank you.
--
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> All help, suggestions, comments, much appreciated. Thanks
Please read the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" at [1]. That's a good
written tutorial for beginners and reading it should answer your
questions.
> Holgar Ostermann
cu
Adrian
[1] http
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
[...]
> Second question, when using dpkg-buildpackage, it creates the diff. But when
> I've changed a few files (such as .c ones) and have s
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:31:52 -0800
> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Manfred Wassmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: debhelper and multiple README files
>
> Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> > Well, I'm not that familiar wi
* Itai Zukerman
(please don't cc me, I'm on the list)
| 1. If all you're doing is a compile for a new architecture, then why
| is it necessary to bump the package version? If you modify *anything*
| in debian/* (for example, the Architecture or Build-Depends fields in
| debian/control), then i
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:46:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
>
> First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
> number? I've read the man, the docs, and
Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
number? I've read the man, the docs, and so on, and can't find this. I mean, if
I have a package -3.2 dh_make returns
87 matches
Mail list logo
