On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:16:50AM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every
> possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and
> brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-on
>
> Hi folks,
>
> For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every
> possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and
> brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch
> to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very
Hi folks,
For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every
possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and
brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch
to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very small). Hopeful
Hi folks,
For the last couple of couple of couple of hours, I have been trying every
possible thing to make two packages I just adopted (ibrazilian and
brazilian-conjugate) go outside of /usr/doc. I am attaching the diff-only patch
to the ibrazilian source code in this e-mail (very small). Hopefu
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-> copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there a
> >tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?)
>
> debchange (in the devscripts p
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:32:31PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:43:42AM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> > Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
> > on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
> > testing proce
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-> copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there a
> >tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?)
>
> debchange (in the devscripts
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:00:35PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I translate Debian Constitution into Korean. However, I am stuck at the
> meaning
> of "Concorde Vote Counting". Anyone explain it to me into plain english?
concorde means 'harmony' en francais (pretty sure)
debian's
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:21:38PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's better if you run
> and develop on potato since then your package will also run there and
> potato users will also be able to use your package.
There is no requirement t
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:32:31PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:43:42AM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> > Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
> > on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
> > testing proc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:00:35PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I translate Debian Constitution into Korean. However, I am stuck at the meaning
> of "Concorde Vote Counting". Anyone explain it to me into plain english?
concorde means 'harmony' en francais (pretty sure)
debian's co
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:43:42AM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
> on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
> testing process handle that part of it. See the list archives (I believe it
> was o
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What i use to do is either :
> >
> > 1) just apply the diff file to the new package, chmod +x debian/rules, and
> > check that nothing broke.
> >
> >and once in a while i also do :
> >
> > 2
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:23:23AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
> >build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
> >
> >In this case, does the binaries that get build for all
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
>build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
>
>In this case, does the binaries that get build for all arches go into testing,
>and not the one which only gets build for some
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:21:38PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's better if you run
> and develop on potato since then your package will also run there and
> potato users will also be able to use your package.
There is no requirement
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What i use to do is either :
>
> 1) just apply the diff file to the new package, chmod +x debian/rules, and
> check that nothing broke.
>
>and once in a while i also do :
>
> 2) do a dh_make on the new upstream source, and one by one migrate the stuff
> d
Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
testing process handle that part of it. See the list archives (I believe it
was on -devel, but -mentors has had several posts about it) for info on
set
Hi!
I'm wondering what should I do with package versions when building package from
the same source version under different distributions (e.g.
stable/testing/unstable) ?
Siaco.
--
** Internet Designers S.A., ul. Przedmiejska 6--10, 54-201 Wrocław **
tel. (071) 35 00 445 w. 25; fax (071) 37 35
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:21:38PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Nazdar,
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> > I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> > unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> > possible) wouldn
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:48:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've to build a new package against a new upstream version released by
> the upstream author of one of my packages.
> What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
> debianized source tree ?
>
> Have I to un
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:48:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
> debianized source tree ?
>
> Have I to unpack the new orig file and copy in it the old debian/ dir ?
No!
See chapter 6.4 "Updating the
package".
Best w
I've to build a new package against a new upstream version released by
the upstream author of one of my packages.
What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
debianized source tree ?
Have I to unpack the new orig file and copy in it the old debian/ dir ?
TIA
Bye
--
Nazdar,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> possible) wouldn't like to switch to unstable.
No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's
Hello, ...
Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
In this case, does the binaries that get build for all arches go into testing,
and not the one which only gets build for some of them, or does all the
binari
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:43:42AM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
> on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
> testing process handle that part of it. See the list archives (I believe it
> was
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What i use to do is either :
> >
> > 1) just apply the diff file to the new package, chmod +x debian/rules, and
> > check that nothing broke.
> >
> >and once in a while i also do :
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:23:23AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
> >build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
> >
> >In this case, does the binaries that get build for al
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
>build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
>
>In this case, does the binaries that get build for all arches go into testing,
>and not the one which only gets build for som
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What i use to do is either :
>
> 1) just apply the diff file to the new package, chmod +x debian/rules, and
> check that nothing broke.
>
>and once in a while i also do :
>
> 2) do a dh_make on the new upstream source, and one by one migrate the stuff
>
Compiling it for testing's generally useless... you'll just want to built it
on unstable, then in a stable chroot, or vice-versa and let the normal
testing process handle that part of it. See the list archives (I believe it
was on -devel, but -mentors has had several posts about it) for info on
se
Hi!
I'm wondering what should I do with package versions when building package from
the same source version under different distributions (e.g.
stable/testing/unstable) ?
Siaco.
--
** Internet Designers S.A., ul. Przedmiejska 6--10, 54-201 Wrocław **
tel. (071) 35 00 445 w. 25; fax (071) 37 3
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:21:38PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Nazdar,
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> > I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> > unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> > possible) would
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:48:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've to build a new package against a new upstream version released by
> the upstream author of one of my packages.
> What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
> debianized source tree ?
>
> Have I to u
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:48:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
> debianized source tree ?
>
> Have I to unpack the new orig file and copy in it the old debian/ dir ?
No!
See chapter 6.4 "Updating the
package".
Best
I've to build a new package against a new upstream version released by
the upstream author of one of my packages.
What I have to do to merge the new upstream version in the old one
debianized source tree ?
Have I to unpack the new orig file and copy in it the old debian/ dir ?
TIA
Bye
--
Nazdar,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> possible) wouldn't like to switch to unstable.
No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's
Hello, ...
Say i have a multi-binary package, where one of the binaries does not get
build for one of the arches (namely arm in this case).
In this case, does the binaries that get build for all arches go into testing,
and not the one which only gets build for some of them, or does all the
binar
38 matches
Mail list logo
