On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=100
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They are not (any more), with the caveat you can override it using
a -m option
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They
I want to fix bug #106690, which only exists in the testing distribution,
not in the unstable distribution. (I admit that it's probably partly my
fault that the bug had a chance of occurring in the first place, I should
have added some Depends or Conflicts lines or something, but now I can't
fix
On Wednesday 10 Oct 2001 7:24 am, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would
love to contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to
maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me
out? For anyone who wants
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
On Wed, Oct 10 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, that does not work either. I get the same error:
Well, that's my point. The problem is not with the hppa
architecture, but with the fact that
Stijn de Bekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, that does not work either. I get the same error:
Well, that was the plan, wasn't it ... reproducing it on your machine.
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/stijn/htdig-3.1.5/htlib'
g++-3.0 -c
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does anyone know how to create a proper Release file?
If by 'proper' you mean a file that apt won't complain about: just use
touch.
Otherwise, just use an existing one (e.g.
/var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Release)
as
David Kimdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for
cvs.
Superb!
It looks to me like the most reasonable path is to make libdb3.3
packages that can co-exist with libdb3.
Seems so. You should probably confer with the libdb3 maintainer
Hi Ove
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:22:07PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Problem is:
flightgear 0.7.6 is in testing, it depends on simgear0 0.0.14 and plib1 1.2
flightgear 0.7.8 is in unstable, it depends on simgear0 0.0.16 and plib 1.4
simgear0 0.0.16 is in testing and unstable, it is built
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz says:
One question to reading that page:
libming is a valid candidate and is depending on libc6 only.
The dependency is versioned on (= 2.2.3-7), but libc6 2.2.4-1 is in
testing.
Any idea what is keeping libming out of testing?
Is
Stijn de Bekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=1002598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 03:56:58PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz says:
One question to reading that page:
libming is a valid candidate and is depending on libc6 only.
The dependency is versioned on (= 2.2.3-7), but libc6
hello,
I have this warning :
Now running lintian...
W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
/usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
Finished running lintian.
This is debian/menu :
?package(komba2):\
needs=X11\
section=Apps/Net\
title=komba2\
command=/usr/bin/komba2\
Peter S Galbraith:
The problem is not really with hppa, but with g++-3.0.
Here's what I do to test build (another package) using g++-3.0 :
Is it possible to get g++ 3 for i386 somewhere? That would make it a
lot easier to test if things work... :)
--
\\//
peter -
On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 01:47, David Kimdon wrote:
It looks to me like the most reasonable path is to make libdb3.3
packages that can co-exist with libdb3.
This doesn't seem to be restricted to subversion either. Evolution
depends on db3 v. 3.1.17 specifically, and I'm having a problem
compiling
Hi, a user has reported bug #113723 with the xmms-cdread package, which
neither I nor the upstream author can reproduce. If anyone would like to
look at this bug and throw out some ideas or even a patch, that would be
great.
--
___ ___
/ _ | / _ \ Ari Pollak - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 10-Oct-2001 Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote:
hello,
I have this warning :
Now running lintian...
W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
/usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
Finished running lintian.
How can I correct this ?
what does kderemove do? I have never seen this, nor is it in
peter karlsson wrote:
Peter S Galbraith:
The problem is not really with hppa, but with g++-3.0.
Here's what I do to test build (another package) using g++-3.0 :
Is it possible to get g++ 3 for i386 somewhere? That would make it a
lot easier to test if things work... :)
Sure, install
Peter S Galbraith:
Sure, install the package 'g++-3.0'.
Hmm, interesting. It doesn't show up when I do dpkg -l, but obviously
apt knows about it.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=100
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:30:53PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They are not (any more), with the caveat you can override it using
a -m option
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They
I want to fix bug #106690, which only exists in the testing distribution,
not in the unstable distribution. (I admit that it's probably partly my
fault that the bug had a chance of occurring in the first place, I should
have added some Depends or Conflicts lines or something, but now I can't
fix
On Wednesday 10 Oct 2001 7:24 am, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would
love to contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to
maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me
out? For anyone who wants
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
On Wed, Oct 10 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Stijn de Bekker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, that does not work either. I get the same error:
Well, that's my point. The problem is not with the hppa
architecture, but with the fact that hppa
Stijn de Bekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, that does not work either. I get the same error:
Well, that was the plan, wasn't it ... reproducing it on your machine.
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/stijn/htdig-3.1.5/htlib'
g++-3.0 -c
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does anyone know how to create a proper Release file?
If by 'proper' you mean a file that apt won't complain about: just use
touch.
Otherwise, just use an existing one (e.g.
/var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Release)
as a
David Kimdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for
cvs.
Superb!
It looks to me like the most reasonable path is to make libdb3.3
packages that can co-exist with libdb3.
Seems so. You should probably confer with the libdb3 maintainer
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have a clue why the working packages won't move into testing,
and what I can do about it?
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz says:
* flightgear/i386: Unsatisfiable Depends: plib1 (= 1.4.1-1), fgfs-base
(= 0.7.8-1)
Hi Ove
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:22:07PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Problem is:
flightgear 0.7.6 is in testing, it depends on simgear0 0.0.14 and plib1 1.2
flightgear 0.7.8 is in unstable, it depends on simgear0 0.0.16 and plib 1.4
simgear0 0.0.16 is in testing and unstable, it is built
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz says:
One question to reading that page:
libming is a valid candidate and is depending on libc6 only.
The dependency is versioned on (= 2.2.3-7), but libc6 2.2.4-1 is in
testing.
Any idea what is keeping libming out of testing?
Is
Stijn de Bekker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently, the building of my htdig package fails on the hppa
architecture (as is also noted by bug #105045):
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=htdigver=3.1.5-3arch=hppastamp=1002598209file=logas=raw
My question is pretty simple; how can I
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 03:56:58PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz says:
One question to reading that page:
libming is a valid candidate and is depending on libc6 only.
The dependency is versioned on (= 2.2.3-7), but libc6 2.2.4-1
hello,
I have this warning :
Now running lintian...
W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
/usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
Finished running lintian.
This is debian/menu :
?package(komba2):\
needs=X11\
section=Apps/Net\
title=komba2\
command=/usr/bin/komba2\
Peter S Galbraith:
The problem is not really with hppa, but with g++-3.0.
Here's what I do to test build (another package) using g++-3.0 :
Is it possible to get g++ 3 for i386 somewhere? That would make it a
lot easier to test if things work... :)
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 01:47, David Kimdon wrote:
It looks to me like the most reasonable path is to make libdb3.3
packages that can co-exist with libdb3.
This doesn't seem to be restricted to subversion either. Evolution
depends on db3 v. 3.1.17 specifically, and I'm having a problem
compiling
Hi, a user has reported bug #113723 with the xmms-cdread package, which
neither I nor the upstream author can reproduce. If anyone would like to
look at this bug and throw out some ideas or even a patch, that would be
great.
--
___ ___
/ _ | / _ \ Ari Pollak - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 10-Oct-2001 Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote:
hello,
I have this warning :
Now running lintian...
W: komba2: menu-item-contains-unknown-tag kderemove
/usr/lib/menu/komba2:7
Finished running lintian.
How can I correct this ?
what does kderemove do? I have never seen this, nor is it in
peter karlsson wrote:
Peter S Galbraith:
The problem is not really with hppa, but with g++-3.0.
Here's what I do to test build (another package) using g++-3.0 :
Is it possible to get g++ 3 for i386 somewhere? That would make it a
lot easier to test if things work... :)
Sure, install
Peter S Galbraith:
Sure, install the package 'g++-3.0'.
Hmm, interesting. It doesn't show up when I do dpkg -l, but obviously
apt knows about it.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
45 matches
Mail list logo
