On Saturday 09 November 2002 19:08, Marc Nozell wrote:
> I'm starting to package up a tool and have some questions about
> 'pristine source'.
>
> * The upstream author only distributes as a ZIP file. Since
> dpkg-buildpackage, dh_make, etc only understand .tar.gz files,
> is it acceptable for
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:12:57 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > > dh_installinit adds 'invoke-rc.d start' (or: init.d/package start) to
> > > postinst, hence, after dpkg-reconfigure is run, po
[Please no CC on reply, I'm subscribed to the list]
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>
>> What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases?
>
> They do fix them, but they have extremely long release cycles.
Would it be that har
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:34:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
[snip]
> What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> source?
apt-build should help, it works well (at least for me).
> And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels and modules
> appropriately? Should I build
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:06:58 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep prerm =dpkg-reconfigure
> > foreach my $info (['prerm','upgrade', $version],
>
> May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> ${mi
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> > ${misc:Depends}?
>
> No. That's a build-dependency, you know. There is no runtime dependency.
Of course debconf (dpkg-reconfigure) is needed at run time. Are you
confu
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> source?
Take a look at pentium-builder.
> And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels and modules
> appropriately?
Well, "as usual". What problems do you have in mind?
> Should I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> May I voice an opinion against a gratuitous message saying that the
> behavior has changed but without real useful value? Those darn
> "click-throughs" are a large part of the complaints against debian
> packages during an install. May I suggest that if a
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
> > section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
> > there has been no change in the section in
Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:06:58 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep prerm =dpkg-reconfigure
> > foreach my $info (['prerm','upgrade', $version],
>
> May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> ${misc:Depends}?
What
Martin Godisch wrote:
> Since debconf 1.2.9 dpkg-reconfigure calls prerm, which does invoke-rc.d
> stop, so I think this would be the correct runtime dependency when
> dpkg-reconfigure has to stop a daemon before it can be (re)started in
> postinst...
I don't see what you mean, and this seems to h
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:13:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> >
> > > May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> > > ${misc:Depends}?
> >
> > No. That's a build-depe
Hi debian-mentors!
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:13:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > >
> > > > May I suggest that dh_installi
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> > source?
>
> Take a look at pentium-builder.
Thanks.
>
> > And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels an
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:09:44PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:34:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> [snip]
> > What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> > source?
> apt-build should help, it works well (at least for me).
That had an interes
Hi!
excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list.
Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or San
francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it very much
(like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a good
op
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking for sponsors for the following packages:
lib765 (lib765, lib765-dev)
- an emulation of the uPD765a floppy drive controller
libdsk (libdsk, libdsk-dev)
- handles various floppy disk image formats
xfuse (xfuse-common, xfuse-
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as you had it, but just signed it th
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:35:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
> >
> > If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She sho
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as you had it,
[Please no CC on reply, I'm subscribed to the list]
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>
>> What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases?
>
> They do fix them, but they have extremely long release cycles.
Would it be that har
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:34:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
[snip]
> What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> source?
apt-build should help, it works well (at least for me).
> And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels and modules
> appropriately? Should I build
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:06:58 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > joey@dragon:~>grep prerm =dpkg-reconfigure
> > foreach my $info (['prerm','upgrade', $version],
>
> May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> ${misc:Dep
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> > ${misc:Depends}?
>
> No. That's a build-dependency, you know. There is no runtime dependency.
Of course debconf (dpkg-reconfigure) is needed at run time. Are you
confu
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> source?
Take a look at pentium-builder.
> And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels and modules
> appropriately?
Well, "as usual". What problems do you have in mind?
> Should I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> May I voice an opinion against a gratuitous message saying that the
> behavior has changed but without real useful value? Those darn
> "click-throughs" are a large part of the complaints against debian
> packages during an install. May I suggest that if a
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
> > section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
> > there has been no change in the section in
Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:06:58 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > joey@dragon:~>grep prerm =dpkg-reconfigure
> > foreach my $info (['prerm','upgrade', $version],
>
> May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> ${misc:Depends}?
Whatever f
Martin Godisch wrote:
> Since debconf 1.2.9 dpkg-reconfigure calls prerm, which does invoke-rc.d
> stop, so I think this would be the correct runtime dependency when
> dpkg-reconfigure has to stop a daemon before it can be (re)started in
> postinst...
I don't see what you mean, and this seems to h
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:13:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> >
> > > May I suggest that dh_installinit adds 'debconf (>= 1.2.9)' to
> > > ${misc:Depends}?
> >
> > No. That's a build-depe
Hi debian-mentors!
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 09:13:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > >
> > > > May I suggest that dh_installi
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> > source?
>
> Take a look at pentium-builder.
Thanks.
>
> > And, using kernel-package, how do I build kernels an
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:09:44PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:34:58PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> [snip]
> > What is the debian way to do this when I'm building packages from
> > source?
> apt-build should help, it works well (at least for me).
That had an interes
Hi!
excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list.
Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or San
francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it very much
(like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a good
op
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking for sponsors for the following packages:
lib765 (lib765, lib765-dev)
- an emulation of the uPD765a floppy drive controller
libdsk (libdsk, libdsk-dev)
- handles various floppy disk image formats
xfuse (xfuse-common, xfuse-
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as you had it, but just signed it th
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:35:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
> >
> > If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She sho
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
>
> If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
> as you had it,
40 matches
Mail list logo
