On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:06:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Howdy,
>
> hello.
>
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, a
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
> package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
> for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
> Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:06:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Howdy,
>
> hello.
>
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, a
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
> package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
> for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
> Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).
Howdy,
I've just finished my first attempt at packaging a python module.
This module (people.debian.org/~smr/pyvtk) is purely python.
I followed the "python policy" outlined in /usr/share/doc/python, and
also looked at a couple of example packages.
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
Howdy,
I've just finished my first attempt at packaging a python module.
This module (people.debian.org/~smr/pyvtk) is purely python.
I followed the "python policy" outlined in /usr/share/doc/python, and
also looked at a couple of example packages.
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
> Just noticed it. I somehow got false information that its not possible
> to ITP a package without first getting a sponsor. So I packaged phpbb and
> sent
Anyone can file a bug; an ITP or RFP is no different in that regard. It's a
little haphaz
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
> Just noticed it. I somehow got false information that its not possible
> to ITP a package without first getting a sponsor. So I packaged phpbb and sent
Anyone can file a bug; an ITP or RFP is no different in that regard. It's a
little haphazard
> OTOH, the BTS can serve as a todo list, which is why I regularly file
> bugs against my own packages. This is especially useful when you hand
> over the package later and haven't done everything you wanted to do
> (for lack of time or sth.), the new maintainer will then have an idea
> of what you
Kenneth,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm thinking it
> would be n
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
It's up to you...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie."
> OTOH, the BTS can serve as a todo list, which is why I regularly file
> bugs against my own packages. This is especially useful when you hand
> over the package later and haven't done everything you wanted to do
> (for lack of time or sth.), the new maintainer will then have an idea
> of what you
While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
Debian version of the package is 1.06-2). I've filed a bug against
libhtml-tableextract-perl requ
Kenneth,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm thinking it
> would be n
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
It's up to you...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie."
While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
Debian version of the package is 1.06-2). I've filed a bug against
libhtml-tableextract-perl requ
Hello,
I've just finished packaging proxytunnel and I'm looking for people to
test and check my package and also for a sponsor to upload it.
The package is avalaible at:
http://l.leguyader.free.fr/depot/proxytunnel/
Thanks.
--
Pixar Animation Studios: Reality is not our business.
Pixar's "Toy St
How is the /etc/ld.so.conf file managed in Debian? For locally compiled
packages, it is somewhat of a pain to have to add /usr/local/lib/ to the
/etc/ld.so.conf. I would like to file a wishlist bug for the /usr/local/lib/
to be added to ld.so.conf by default. Only problem is I don't know how it
Hello,
I've just finished packaging proxytunnel and I'm looking for people to
test and check my package and also for a sponsor to upload it.
The package is avalaible at:
http://l.leguyader.free.fr/depot/proxytunnel/
Thanks.
--
Pixar Animation Studios: Reality is not our business.
Pixar's "Toy St
How is the /etc/ld.so.conf file managed in Debian? For locally compiled
packages, it is somewhat of a pain to have to add /usr/local/lib/ to the
/etc/ld.so.conf. I would like to file a wishlist bug for the /usr/local/lib/
to be added to ld.so.conf by default. Only problem is I don't know how it
Hello Matthew,
Just noticed it. I somehow got false information that its not possible
to ITP a package without first getting a sponsor. So I packaged phpbb and sent
a request to -mentors and -devel(on 03-11-02; Sylvain ITP'd it on 07-11-02)
looking
for a sponsor who can check the packa
23 matches
Mail list logo
