Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Shiju p. Nair
Hi mentors, Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl libmng ) both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds to my email for unknown reason. Its now more than two weeks now that I have heard anything from him. I

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, I'm new to the list and I'd like to make Debian packages. I read this mail and the question follows... ___ / Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Daniel Ruoso wrote: | As debmake and dh-make are the two mostly used helper scripts,

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Gergely Nagy
If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make a package? dh_make. I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in. (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable compromise :)

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
___ / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to | make a package? | | dh_make. | | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and | it is way too

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Gergely Nagy
| I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and | it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in. | | (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable | compromise :) In every case, I'll have to run lintian (debuild do it automatically, isn't it?) to check

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi Arnaud On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to | make a package? | dh_make. | | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and |

need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Gevaerts
Hi, the foobillard Makefile.am contains hardcoded CFLAGS. I need to change them for foobillard to work on alpha. Can anyone help me with this ? The problem is that I don't really know where the default should be set. Makefile.am now says if USE_BUMPREF BUMPREF_CFLAGS = else BUMPREF_CFLAGS =

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Leo \Costela\ Antunes
On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote: CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from debian/rules, or configure ? I'd use something like this: CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall if

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread David Lloyd
Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we tend to take three to four weeks' worth of holidays and sometimes we decide to avoid computers like the plague whilst doing so :-)

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:59:31AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote: Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we tend to take three to four weeks' worth of holidays and sometimes we

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:49:36PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:59:31AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote: Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:35:28 +0100, Frank Gevaerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already being present from dh_make): DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU = $(shell

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Shiju p. Nair
Hi mentors, Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl libmng ) both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds to my email for unknown reason. Its now more than two weeks now that I have heard anything from him. I

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Hi all, I'm new to the list and I'd like to make Debian packages. I read this mail and the question follows... ___ / Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Daniel Ruoso

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Gergely Nagy
If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make a package? dh_make. I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in. (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable compromise :)

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
___ / Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to | make a package? | | dh_make. Thank you for your (quick)

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
___ / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to | make a package? | | dh_make. | | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and | it is way too

Unidentified subject!

2003-02-03 Thread daniel archer
i want to unsucscribe from yahoo can u please tell me how to?It's fast, it's easy and it's free! Click here to download MSN Messenger

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Gergely Nagy
| I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and | it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in. | | (Of course, a combination of dh_make and $EDITOR is a viable | compromise :) In every case, I'll have to run lintian (debuild do it automatically, isn't it?) to check

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:15:57PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: lintian will not catch everything. In case you want to run lintian *and* linda on debuild, see my patch at http://bugs.debian.org/178456 There are some things in linda which lintian is not

Re: Looking for sponsor - lib-gnu.regexp-java takeover

2003-02-03 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Looking for sponsor - lib-gnu.regexp-java takeover Date: 02 Feb 2003 13:22:33 +0200 but Lars is not comfortable sponsoring Java packages as he does not use Java. I maint some java packages and I can sponsor yours. Please send url where you upload

Unidentified subject!

2003-02-03 Thread Anthony Hurd
Bastian, Here is the copy of the poem you wrote on the wall yesterday. You are truly a poet. I cried out in pain a moment ago It was a pain, only I could know. It happened alone with nobody near It happened after I had too many beers The pain was real. The pain did last The pain

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi Arnaud On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to | make a package? | dh_make. | | I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and |

need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Gevaerts
Hi, the foobillard Makefile.am contains hardcoded CFLAGS. I need to change them for foobillard to work on alpha. Can anyone help me with this ? The problem is that I don't really know where the default should be set. Makefile.am now says if USE_BUMPREF BUMPREF_CFLAGS = else BUMPREF_CFLAGS =

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Leo \Costela\ Antunes
On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote: CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from debian/rules, or configure ? I'd use something like this: CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall if

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote: CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from debian/rules, or configure ?

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:11:52PM -0200, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote: CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Thomas Viehmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Costela Antunes wrote: from debian/rules, or configure ? if SOME CHECK TO SEE IF ARCH=alpha In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already being present from dh_make): DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU = $(shell dpkg-architecture

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Frank! You wrote: Makefile.am now says [...] CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from debian/rules, or configure ? If you change the above line in Makefile.am to |

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Costela Antunes wrote: from debian/rules, or configure ? if SOME CHECK TO SEE IF ARCH=alpha In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:23:39PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: Hi Frank! You wrote: Makefile.am now says [...] CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} ` What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:39:47AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make a package? dh-make, not that I'm biased or anything - Craig (dh-make maintainer) -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC

Re: debmake and dh-make

2003-02-03 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:20:18PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to make a package? dh_make. I'd suggest $EDITOR, as dh_make does not handle all cases well, and it is way too easy to leave silly buglets in. (Of course, a

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote: Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl libmng ) both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds to my email for unknown reason. Its now That's a

PythonCard packaging advice?

2003-02-03 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Hi, I filed an ITP for PythonCard (http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net), and I've made a first pass at packaging it. I built the following binary packages: libpythoncard-python pythoncard-samples pythoncard-doc Each depends on python (=2.2), python (2.3). The libpythoncard-python

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Simon Richter
Frank, What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably from debian/rules, or configure ? Since this problem is not Debian specific, the best way would be to add it in the configure script if required (i.e. patch configure.in and submit upstream). There may already be

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread David Lloyd
Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we tend to take three to four weeks' worth of holidays and sometimes we decide to avoid computers like the plague whilst doing so :-)

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:59:31AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote: Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we tend to take three to four weeks' worth of holidays and sometimes we

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:49:36PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:59:31AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote: Hi There, I'd be inclined to give people at least three weeks time to respond before assuming they'd dropped off the face of the Earth At least in Australia we

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

2003-02-03 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:35:28 +0100, Frank Gevaerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already being present from dh_make): DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU = $(shell