hi
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
here are the autobuilders logs:
snmpkit
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (s390) (latest build at Sep 18 17:01: maybe-successful)
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (hppa) (latest build at Sep 18 17:04:
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Theo-dora Sogiba, and I am an Events Coordinator for the National
Film and Video Foundation of South Africa (NFVF). We are a statutory body
from the government department of Arts and Culture. We are tasked by our
government with developing and marketing the film and
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:14:16PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not deduce that any of them
were virtual. So I will file
sean finney wrote:
currently, there's a file /etc/sugarplum/apache.conf that has the
rewrite rules, including the location of /sugarplum. if i were to do
one of the above suggestions, what's the best way to handle this file?
would it still be as a conffile, even though every time the package
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:51:15AM +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote:
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
Assuming that you uploaded sparc binaries, it looks like everything worked
fine.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
hi
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
here are the autobuilders logs:
snmpkit
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (s390) (latest build at Sep 18 17:01: maybe-successful)
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (hppa) (latest build at Sep 18 17:04:
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Theo-dora Sogiba, and I am an Events Coordinator for the National
Film and Video Foundation of South Africa (NFVF). We are a statutory body
from the government department of Arts and Culture. We are tasked by our
government with developing and marketing the film and
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:14:16PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not deduce that any of them
were virtual. So I will file
sean finney wrote:
currently, there's a file /etc/sugarplum/apache.conf that has the
rewrite rules, including the location of /sugarplum. if i were to do
one of the above suggestions, what's the best way to handle this file?
would it still be as a conffile, even though every time the package
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:51:15AM +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote:
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
Assuming that you uploaded sparc binaries, it looks like everything worked
fine.
--
- mdz
10 matches
Mail list logo
