Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > > > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
> > >
> > > Since
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > > > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
> > >
> > > Since
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
> >
> > Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
> >
> > Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built
＜事業者＞＜送信者＞
有限会社 富士友の会 ＨＰ担当 石田
〒640-0413 和歌山県貴志川局内神戸862-7
TEL:0736（64）9552
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
◆『YY-NET』会員制ご案内◆
素敵な人生のパートナーをみつけるお手伝いをいたします。
☆こちらは交際・結婚・再婚を望まれる方の会です。
(入会資格は、23歳以上で日本在住の方です。）
☆新規ご入会された方にはあなたのご希望に合った方を1名無料で紹介
します！（写真付プロフィールを1名郵便で紹介します。）
☆独自の交際情報誌を発行しておりますので多数の会員
I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
that already is into the archive.
The files to upload are available at sourceforge
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57915&package_id=53579&release_id=218237
Description: Automatically release/upload debian
Hello Frank!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never
make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here?
Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be rel
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
>
> Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean sid
> chroot out of my system, you can be fairly sure of t
$B!c;v6H$^$l$kJ}$N2q$G$9!#(B
$B!!(B($BF~2q;q3J$O!"(B23$B:P0J>e$GF|K\:_=;$NJ}$G$9!#!K(B
(B
$B!y?75,$4F~2q$5$l$?J}$K$O$"$J$?$N$44uK>$K9g$C$?J}$r(B1$BL>L5NA$G>R2p(B
$B!!$7$^$9!*!JM9JX$G>R2p$7$^$9!#!K(B
(B
$B!yFH<+$N8r:]>pJs;o$rH/9T$7$F$*$j$^$9$N$GB??t$N2q0wMM$+$iA*$Y$k(B
$B!!%7%9%F%
I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
that already is into the archive.
The files to upload are available at sourceforge
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57915&package_id=53579&release_id=218237
Description: Automatically release/upload debian
Hello Frank!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never
make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here?
Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a
> > package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be
>
> Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean sid
> chroot out of my system, you can be fairly sure of t
Hi, Filippo! So, it is "GNU polyxmass", now? You are an official GNU
project and all. Congratulations.
(We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?)
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me.
> >
> > Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to
> > me. I want to ma
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track
> > > -changes...
> > Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I
> > prefer
> >
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never
> make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here?
Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released, and since
these scripts are so *useful* ;-), it might be that somebod
Hi, Filippo! So, it is "GNU polyxmass", now? You are an official GNU
project and all. Congratulations.
(We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?)
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are
Hello Thomas!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:42:11AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi
How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages?
(SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe
> > > it's not
> >
> >
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me.
> >
> > Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to
> > me. I want to ma
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes...
> > Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer
> > parsing thos
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track
> > -changes...
> Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I
> prefer
> parsing those over automatically processing email. Also,
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never
> make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here?
Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released, and since
these scripts are so *useful* ;-), it might be that somebod
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe
> > it's not
>
> That's the problem with the FTP masters naming everything after women -
>
Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi
How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages?
(SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.)
>Should I rather explain the dependencies for each single one of these
>23 demandi
Hi,
I intend to package hoz, here is the summary.
Package name: hoz
Version : 1.65
Upstream Author : Gustavo Picon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://hoz.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : A file splitter with GTK interface
HOZ is what you
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> >4) Automatically removing packages once they've been uploaded seems to be a
>> >general winner.
>> Couldn't you just reference packages.d.o (or a local Packages/Sources file)?
>Sorry, I don't understand this. Are you suggesting that I scan an updated
>
Hello Thomas!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:42:11AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi
How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages?
(SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.)
Oh, I
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not
> >
> > That's
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >2) Download tracking, both by count and "yes I'll upload this" via web
> >browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable
> >resources, or whether pre-built bina
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes...
> Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer
> parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it does
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not
>
> That's the problem with the FTP masters naming everything after women -
> nobo
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me.
>
> Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to
> me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose
A wor
Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi
How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages?
(SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.)
>Should I rather explain the dependencies for each single one of these
>23 demandi
Hi,
I intend to package hoz, here is the summary.
Package name: hoz
Version : 1.65
Upstream Author : Gustavo Picon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://hoz.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : A file splitter with GTK interface
HOZ is what you
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> >4) Automatically removing packages once they've been uploaded seems to be a
>> >general winner.
>> Couldn't you just reference packages.d.o (or a local Packages/Sources file)?
>Sorry, I don't understand this. Are you suggesting that I scan an updated
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >2) Download tracking, both by count and "yes I'll upload this" via web
> >browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable
> >resources, or whether pre-built bina
37 matches
Mail list logo
