Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have an idea why apt decides Holding Back tetex-bin rather
than change dvipdfm?
It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex
Hi Kevin,
Have you tested it? I don't use KDE so
can't do so myself.
Yes, it works for me. I have also briefly looked through the source
package and found nothing to criticize. Unfortunately, I am not a DD
either and can't sponsor it.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
Hi,
today I packaged 'ruby-audiooutput' by Rik Hemsley as libao-ruby and now
I am looking for a sponsor for the packages.
Upstream Homepage: http://rikkus.info/ruby_audiooutput.html
Description:
Libao is a cross platform audio output library, currently supporting
output to several `live' (oss,
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 01:23:39 -0300
Luciano Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
Neither I, so I cannot sponsor you, only provide some advices :)
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
Ok, so now after being shown a LOT of stuff I didn't know in round 1
I would like to try again.
As a note for any potential sponsor I would like to say that the
creation of the libschoolbell package is probably the most likely source
of errors.
This package contains the .so (not .so.1) files
Source: helix-player
Section: graphics
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Thomas Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Debian Helix Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), dpatch, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev,
libpango1.0-dev, libvorbis-dev, libogg-dev, libtheora-dev,
Hi Kevin!
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:18:29PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I am seeking a sponsor for viewglob.
Send me private email. I'll sponsor you.
Remarks:
- md5sum of orig.tar.gz you provide differs from upstream tar.gz [1]
e8ffcb70a2635d88dd93505a877d31fe viewglob-0.8.4.tar.gz
package tipa
tags 234942 + help
thank
* Jan Behrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-09-03 14:26]:
Package: tipa
Version: 1:1.1.beta-3
Followup-For: Bug #234942
Hi,
I think this bug is due to the following line in /var/lib/dpkg/info/tipa.prerm:
/usr/bin/defoma-font purge-all-all $FILE
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 09:36:30AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
That's what it does, and since it does the problem occured. Was I unclear
in my first mail?
I must have been looking at tetex-base rather than tetex-bin, which only
replaces dvipdfm.
Indeed when updating apt first the problem
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:08:28PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
Remarks:
- diff.gz
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
Nicolas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
El Viernes, 3 de Septiembre de 2004 06:23, Luciano Bello escribió:
* URL :http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=14847
Read at the bottom of the description:
8-
This is the last release of Kubication. I've discontinued it because i've
started writing a KDE daemon
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:08:28PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
Remarks:
- diff.gz
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
... or indeed any such
Hi
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
It was never and hopefully will never be.
I simply like dpatch.
cu, ms
--
n: Michael Schiansky (geek / nerd / dd)
e:
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
... or indeed any such obfuscated patching system ...
Why do you call dpatch 'obfuscated' ?
Before I used it for one of my packages i quickly checked the code and it
simply works. No big fancy stuff etc.
Did I miss a part?
cu,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
... or indeed any such obfuscated patching system ...
Why do you call dpatch 'obfuscated' ?
Before I used it for one of my packages i quickly checked the code
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of
Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew Palmer:
I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty
diff. Weird, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
That usually works just fine, and it what I do when I release jwhois,
since I have also been doing the
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have an idea why apt decides Holding Back tetex-bin rather
than change dvipdfm?
It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex
Hi Kevin,
Have you tested it? I don't use KDE so
can't do so myself.
Yes, it works for me. I have also briefly looked through the source
package and found nothing to criticize. Unfortunately, I am not a DD
either and can't sponsor it.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
Hi,
today I packaged 'ruby-audiooutput' by Rik Hemsley as libao-ruby and now
I am looking for a sponsor for the packages.
Upstream Homepage: http://rikkus.info/ruby_audiooutput.html
Description:
Libao is a cross platform audio output library, currently supporting
output to several `live' (oss,
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 01:23:39 -0300
Luciano Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
Neither I, so I cannot sponsor you, only provide some advices :)
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
Ok, so now after being shown a LOT of stuff I didn't know in round 1
I would like to try again.
As a note for any potential sponsor I would like to say that the
creation of the libschoolbell package is probably the most likely source
of errors.
This package contains the .so (not .so.1) files
Source: helix-player
Section: graphics
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Thomas Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Debian Helix Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), dpatch, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev,
libpango1.0-dev, libvorbis-dev, libogg-dev, libtheora-dev,
package tipa
tags 234942 + help
thank
* Jan Behrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-09-03 14:26]:
Package: tipa
Version: 1:1.1.beta-3
Followup-For: Bug #234942
Hi,
I think this bug is due to the following line in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tipa.prerm:
/usr/bin/defoma-font purge-all-all
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 09:36:30AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
That's what it does, and since it does the problem occured. Was I unclear
in my first mail?
I must have been looking at tetex-base rather than tetex-bin, which only
replaces dvipdfm.
Indeed when updating apt first the problem
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:08:28PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
Remarks:
- diff.gz
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
Nicolas
El Viernes, 3 de Septiembre de 2004 06:23, Luciano Bello escribió:
* URL :http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=14847
Read at the bottom of the description:
8-
This is the last release of Kubication. I've discontinued it because i've
started writing a KDE daemon
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:08:28PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
Remarks:
- diff.gz
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
... or indeed any such
UUpppss... sorry :(
I talked with the upstream before the ITP and he said me that he will
maintened the program and work on it. But he decide kill the
development[2].
Luciano
and sorry for my english
El vie, 03-09-2004 a las 14:37, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
El Viernes, 3 de Septiembre de
Hi
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
please use dpatch to manage paches on upstream source
Since when is the use of dpatch mandatory?
It was never and hopefully will never be.
I simply like dpatch.
cu, ms
--
n: Michael Schiansky (geek / nerd / dd)
e:
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
... or indeed any such obfuscated patching system ...
Why do you call dpatch 'obfuscated' ?
Before I used it for one of my packages i quickly checked the code and it
simply works. No big fancy stuff etc.
Did I miss a part?
cu,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Michael Schiansky wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
... or indeed any such obfuscated patching system ...
Why do you call dpatch 'obfuscated' ?
Before I used it for one of my packages i quickly checked the code
33 matches
Mail list logo
