Re: RFS: tnef -- Tool to unpack MIME application/ms-tnef attachments

2006-04-07 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:05:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote.. > * debian/control: need an extra space before Homepage (see the > devref 6.2.4), may as well remove the extra / from the end of the > URL. Fixed the extra space. Think I'll leave the extra / given the discussion on th

Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-04-07 Thread Felipe Sateler
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:52 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Frank Küster wrote: >> > If the place for configuration is mentioned anywhere in the upstream >> > documentation, this is the place to indicate the Debian-specific >> > placement. [snip] > I think that Frank meant

Hallo, da ist doch....

2006-04-07 Thread kostenlos
...für jeden was dabei! Bis zu 40 Gratis Fotoabzüge! Pixum macht das beste aus Ihren digitalen Fotos! Einfach Fotos hochladen, bestellen und bis zu 40 Abzüge gratis bekommen. http://ad.zanox.com/ppc/?2811697C1044541391T Erfahren Sie Ihr wahres Sternzeichen! Wussten Sie, das sich durch einen as

Re: Bug#361253: ITP: zenoss -- Zenoss is a powerful, integrated, easy-to-use IT infrastructure monitoring software product.

2006-04-07 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:55:40PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote: > Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:01:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote: > >> * Package name: zenoss > >> Version : x.y.z > > > > Version? > > Oh ooops - seems like my personal multi

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/7/06, Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Bernhard R. Link schrieb: > > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.dsc > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.diff.gz > > > The md5sum of th

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > On Friday 07 April 2006 14:49, Stephen Gran wrote: > [cut] > > No problem, we all make mistakes. Now, the buildingof the package is > > ready, but the depends really aren't. I cannot, for instance, run the > > program in a clean chroot - I get

Re: Bug#361253: ITP: zenoss -- Zenoss is a powerful, integrated, easy-to-use IT infrastructure monitoring software product.

2006-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Lonien
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:01:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote: >> * Package name: zenoss >> Version : x.y.z > > Version? Oh ooops - seems like my personal multitasking abilities were disabled for a while... sorry. Since this will be my firs

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Claudio Moratti
On Friday 07 April 2006 14:49, Stephen Gran wrote: [cut] > No problem, we all make mistakes. Now, the buildingof the package is > ready, but the depends really aren't. I cannot, for instance, run the > program in a clean chroot - I get perl errors and it refuses to start. > Can you please investi

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > On Friday 07 April 2006 11:35, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > > Please test that it builds in a clean chroot - you are now missing a > > build dependency, and it fails to build from source without it. > sorry for this stupid mistake :( > It's the seco

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Claudio Moratti
On Friday 07 April 2006 11:35, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > > On Friday 07 April 2006 00:32, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking for a sponsor for qvamps package! > > > > > > I wou

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Ricardo Mones
[Please don't CC me on mailing lists I post, I'm subscribed] On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:38:25 +0200 artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but that's not fixed properly: you don't have to change > > attribution of _all_ entries on changelog, only the last one (your > > changes). > > > Do

Re: RFS: tnef -- Tool to unpack MIME application/ms-tnef attachments

2006-04-07 Thread Gerber van der Graaf
I recently had a similar problem with my package libgpiv2; the differences between upstram .tar.gz and .orig.tar.gz., I think , is due to the differences in the root direcory names. Programs/scripts like dh_make create a new directory 'name.orig' if you start to debianize an upstream package from s

Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-04-07 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:52 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > If the place for configuration is mentioned anywhere in the upstream > > documentation, this is the place to indicate the Debian-specific > > placement. > Mmmh, so I put again the file, plus a note on where locales a

Re: RFS: tnef -- Tool to unpack MIME application/ms-tnef attachments

2006-04-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060407 08:05]: > * debian/control: need an extra space before Homepage (see the > devref 6.2.4), may as well remove the extra / from the end of > the URL. Without that slash it is no URL any more. (Slashes at the end of the path may be omitted

Re: RFS: tnef -- Tool to unpack MIME application/ms-tnef attachments

2006-04-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060406 18:29]: > I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'tnef'. This is a great > little program for unpacking those winmail.dat attachments that some > of your friends insist on sending you. tnef has been in the Debian > Archives since December 2000 and wa

RFS: dbacl 1.12-1; RFH: robotour Bug#360950

2006-04-07 Thread Zak B. Elep
Hi all! =) I'm looking for a sponsor for dbacl 1.12-1 that's currently quietly passing time on mentors.debian.net.[0] It is a new upstream version release, and it fixes #339394 (`dbacl --version` now EXIT_SUCCESS). Upstream has also merged in the slang2 patch. [0] http://mentors.debian.net/deb

Re: RFS: tnef -- Tool to unpack MIME application/ms-tnef attachments

2006-04-07 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Paul Wise schrieb: * debian/control: need an extra space before Homepage (see the devref 6.2.4), may as well remove the extra / from the end of the URL. No. The / at the end is usually important, although a number of web servers hand out redirects (i.e. one extra ro

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Bernhard R. Link schrieb: http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.dsc http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.diff.gz The md5sum of the wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz is different from the md5sum of the wormux-0.7

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060406 17:44]: > I need a sponsor. Here is the source package: > http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.dsc > http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz > http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.diff.gz Some more issues: The

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Brendon Higgins
artefact wrote (Friday 07 April 2006 3:38 am): > >>>That most likely means the maintainer name in the debian/control > >>>file and the debian/changelog file are not the same. (Which you > >>>should better fix) > >> > >>Ok, fixed. > > > > Sorry, but that's not fixed properly: you don't have to chan

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > On Friday 07 April 2006 00:32, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > > > Hi, > > > I'm looking for a sponsor for qvamps package! > > > > I would prefer to see > > these compile time warnings go away, however

Re: RFS qvamps (ITP #361134)

2006-04-07 Thread Claudio Moratti
On Friday 07 April 2006 00:32, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for qvamps package! > > It is lintian errors free ;-) > > It is indeed. The packaging looks good overall. thx :) > I would prefer to see > these compile