* Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060524 15:21]:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Try using http. Or try reprepro instead. I'm considering orphaning
> > debmirror in favour of reprepro.
>
> does reprepro support 'real' mirroring of Packages/Sources file
> preserving signatures from the upst
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Try using http. Or try reprepro instead. I'm considering orphaning
> debmirror in favour of reprepro.
does reprepro support 'real' mirroring of Packages/Sources file
preserving signatures from the upstream mirror? From what I see it does
not.
This is the only feature
Hello,
I am looking for comments/for a sponsor for the package
cvschangelogbuilder [1], detailed info below.
You will notice that I removed some (redundant) documentation from the
binary package. I believe the man page should be the ultimate source for
information in this case. Comments & suggest
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:52 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu wrote:
> Jamie Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>>In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
> >>>mis-translation,
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:21 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Jamie Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> Only if an adequate
> >> English version was available [1], pruning the Japanese docs would be
> >> an option IMO (and only because ~99.9% of Japanese people
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:22 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Jamie Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Based on my understanding of Japanese law, the original document being
> >in Japanese is the one that is legally binding, even if the author makes
> >an English tran
On 5/24/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
> suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better
> place, but I might
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:23:43AM +0200, Vedran Fura?? wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor (or sponsors) for the following packages:
>
> - bfilter (Simple web filtering proxy, see http://bfilter.sf.net)
I'd like to see this in Debian and am willing to sponsor it.
As far as the technical
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:07:04AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>Christoph Haas wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>>cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
>>I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
>
Hi Matt, hi list,
wow, pretty bad news in this week's DWN about cyrus-sasl2 being
orphaned. I checked popcon, and it has some 12.000 installations, so:
I'd really like to do something about it, but I doubt I could, at least
not alone. I never took over a package, and hardly know how to apply
patc
""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
> suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better
> place, but I might be missing something due to my lack of knowledge,
> thus my ch
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> wow, pretty bad news in this week's DWN about cyrus-sasl2 being
> orphaned. I checked popcon, and it has some 12.000 installations, so:
Yes, and it is one of the hariest, most horrible packages to maintain I know
of.
> I'd really like to do something
> > especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
> This isn't an argument for inclusion of the debian directory (will you
> release a new upstream version just because you need to change a
> build-depends and trigger a rebuild on the Debian buildds?).
yikes... pardon my ignorance if it is no
""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/24/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
>> > suppos
"Jamie Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on my understanding of Japanese law, the original document being
in Japanese is the one that is legally binding, even if the author makes
an English translation. Other jurisdictions may accept a hypothetical
English
Hello all,
I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better
place, but I might be missing something due to my lack of knowledge,
thus my choice).
I started creating a local mirror via debmirror sometime ago and t
16 matches
Mail list logo
