Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:01:24PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > IMO, this isn't a bug. The order in which packages are listed in the > build-depends shouldn't matter. Build-Depends: lapack3-dev | refblas3-dev > or Build-Depends: refblas3-dev | lapack3-dev (if you please) is what you > wa

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
On 07/12/20 12:04 +0530, Kumar Appaiah said ... > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Notice that refblas3-dev is _before_ lapack3-dev. Now, if apt-get is > > called faithfully in this order, atlas does not come in. But if it is > > reordered, the lapack3-dev dependen

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > See this old log. The apt-get command follows the same order as > specified in the package's Build-Depends: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=octave2.9&ver=1%3A2.9.17-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1195174810&file=log > > But here, it is

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Hi! On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:56:46AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > The building of a package should not produce a different package if > some additional packages not listed in "Build-Conflicts" are > installed. > > In other words, if you specifically do not want "atlas3-base-dev" to > be

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
On 07/12/20 10:30 +0530, Kumar Appaiah said ... > What I want to know is, earlier builds never pulled in atlas3-base-dev > for the build, as you may see here: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libitpp&arch=i386&ver=4.0.0-3&stamp=1193598381&file=log&as=raw This could just mean that atlas3

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Also, when I try to build the package on my machine outside a > pbuilder, with the B-Deps installed, it works fine without atlas, and > generates packages which don't depend explicitly on libatlas. However, > the moment I try to use pbuilder on it

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
(Annotation at the end) On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:30:14AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Mentors, > > This is with reference to a package of mine, libitpp, whose latest > version I have packaged and it is available at: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_

Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

2007-12-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Debian Mentors, This is with reference to a package of mine, libitpp, whose latest version I have packaged and it is available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_4.0.1-2.dsc What I want to know is, earlier builds never pulled in atlas3-base-dev for the build, a

Re: how to pgp signing

2007-12-19 Thread Franz Pletz
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:31:58AM -0300, Mauro wrote: > i do dpkg-buildpacke -rfakeroot and the whole process > starts and ends fine, but i get this message: > "... > gpg: skipped "Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>": secret key not available > gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not availab

Re: how to pgp signing

2007-12-19 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
Mauro wrote: > Hello guys, this is my very first message to this list :) > i'm having doubts about how to sign with my pgp key a > package that im working on > > i do dpkg-buildpacke -rfakeroot and the whole process > starts and ends fine, but i get this message: > "... > gpg: skipped "Mauro Liza

how to pgp signing

2007-12-19 Thread Mauro
Hello guys, this is my very first message to this list :) i'm having doubts about how to sign with my pgp key a package that im working on i do dpkg-buildpacke -rfakeroot and the whole process starts and ends fine, but i get this message: "... gpg: skipped "Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>": secr

RFS: k3dsurf (maths+3d=fun)

2007-12-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, I'd be glad if someone could check and possibly upload the following source package for me: http://alioth.debian.org/~kibi-guest/k3dsurf/k3dsurf_0.6.2-2.dsc It's mostly a maintenance release, see the changelog entry: ,--- | k3dsurf (0.6.2-2) unstable; urgency=low | | * Add Vcs-Git and V

Re: ITR: wmanager (update, adopt, fix bugs)

2007-12-19 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-3 of the "wmanager" > > package; I am hereby attempting to adopt it, fix its

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Andreas Hoenen wrote: > I rememer a thread on this mailing list starting with [1] that discussed > the issue of reusing the same version number for different uploads to > mentors.debian.net. Most participants agreed to use a new version > number for each upload. I like this approach, as m.d.n. is

Re: RFS: podbrowser (updated package) - 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:27:35 +0100 Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/12/2007, Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've started to check the package last week, it was built ok under > > pbuilder, but I was unable to install it because of broken dependencies > > and had

Re: RFS: yougrabber

2007-12-19 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> People could think that this will be some kind of >> gtk/qt/whatever, but the screenshot shows an ncurses >> application. >> > > In my point of view, ncurse applications are graphic applications, moreover > the "technically speaking" paragraph gives clear detail ("nc

Developer wishing to join "the debian train"

2007-12-19 Thread Richard van Roy
Hello I'm a programmer with at least abdicate understanding of C++ and a long time Debian user. At the moment I have a lot of free time and I wish to spent this productively by aiding Debian in development. I fear however that I only developed software on my own which makes me a little social c

I'm sorry

2007-12-19 Thread Richard van Roy
Ow no, this makes a crappy first impression :S The was something wrong with mu SMTP server, so I accidentally send my meesage four times, very sorry for this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: dia2code

2007-12-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Francesco, * Francesco aloe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-19 19:12]: > Il giorno lun, 17/12/2007 alle 16.40 +0100, Francesco Aloe ha scritto: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-2 > > of my package "dia2code". > > Hi, > I have updated the package fixing some bugs. > > The p

Developer wishing to jump in the Debian train

2007-12-19 Thread righard van roy
Hello I'm a programmer with at least abdicate understanding of C++ and a long time Debian user. At the moment I have a lot of free time and I wish to spent this productively by aiding Debian in development. I fear however that I only developed software on my own which makes me a little social c

Developer wishing to jump in the debian train

2007-12-19 Thread righard van roy
Hello I'm a programmer with at least abdicate understanding of C++ and a long time Debian user. At the moment I have a lot of free time and I wish to spent this productively by aiding Debian in development. I fear however that I only developed software on my own which makes me a little social c

Developer trying to jump in the Debian train

2007-12-19 Thread righard van roy
Hello I'm a programmer with at least abdicate understanding of C++ and a long time Debian user. At the moment I have a lot of free time and I wish to spent this productively by aiding Debian in development. I fear however that I only developed software on my own which makes me a little social c

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:12:03PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote: > > I don't know if there's anything on mentors.d.o that stops you from > > doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions > > before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just > > stick with '-1'

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Andreas Hoenen
"Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now there's just one last minor problem: since you closed some bugs on > 0.2.8-1 which never got uploaded, you would have to close them manually > as the automatic bug handling wouldn't be triggered for them. > > I don't know if there's anyth

Re: RFS: podbrowser (updated package) - 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 19/12/2007, Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've started to check the package last week, it was built ok under > pbuilder, but I was unable to install it because of broken dependencies and > had no time to look further. Do you know if this still happens? I'm somewhat > reluctant to

Re: RFS: yougrabber

2007-12-19 Thread chaica
Hi Nico, On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:00:03 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi chaica, > * chaica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-19 14:43]: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yougrabber". >> > [...] >> It builds these binary packages: >> yougrabber - download simultaneously se

Re: RFS: dia2code

2007-12-19 Thread Francesco aloe
Il giorno lun, 17/12/2007 alle 16.40 +0100, Francesco Aloe ha scritto: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-2 > of my package "dia2code". Hi, I have updated the package fixing some bugs. The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on men

Re: RFS: timelimit - Simple utility to limit a process's absolute execution time

2007-12-19 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:29:10PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:11:36PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, it's me again :) > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my packag

Re: RFS: podbrowser (updated package) - 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi Jeffrey, On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:04:59 +0100 Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-1 > of my package "podbrowser". > > It builds these binary packages: > podbrowser - Documentation browser for Perl > > The package appears to be l

RFS: podbrowser (updated package) - 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-1 of my package "podbrowser". It builds these binary packages: podbrowser - Documentation browser for Perl The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 362648, 363506, 363508, 386270, 455466 The pack

Re: RFS: yougrabber

2007-12-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi chaica, * chaica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-19 14:43]: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yougrabber". > [...] > It builds these binary packages: > yougrabber - download simultaneously several videos from youtube.com > > Yougrabber fetchs videos on youtube.com and stores them on y

RFS: yougrabber

2007-12-19 Thread chaica
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yougrabber". * Package name: yougrabber Version : 0.29.2-2 Upstream Author : Quetzy Garcia * URL : http://yougrabber.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2 Section : net It builds these binary packa