Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > >> This looks reasonable, but trigger another lintian warrning: > >> > >> N: Processing binary package libpocoxml5-dbg (version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1) ... > >>

RFS: sniffit (updated package)

2008-06-07 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.7.beta-13 of my package "sniffit". It builds these binary packages: sniffit- packet sniffer and monitoring tool The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 465931 The package can be found on ment

Re: Help with arch-specific bug in mapnik package

2008-06-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 07/06/2008, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Another possibly silly question (I haven't seen this documented) - > what is the procedure for requesting packages to be installed in an > porter machine chroot - any more efficient way than to email > @buildd.debian.org? Or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,---[ http:/

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread Russ Allbery
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: >> This looks reasonable, but trigger another lintian warrning: >> >> N: Processing binary package libpocoxml5-dbg (version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1) ... >> W: libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > Hello George, > > 2008/6/7 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >As a user of that package, I'm still reluctant to ship it in a > > shape where lintian is not happy enough. I've read your reasoning about > > debug package names you hav

Re: Help with arch-specific bug in mapnik package

2008-06-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any help or advice, therefore, would be greatly appreciated. > > The debian-hppa list might be able to offer hardware access or other help. Thanks, hav

RFS: Nana (updated package)

2008-06-07 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.5-11 of my package "nana". It builds these binary packages: nana - GNU Nana -- improved support for assertions and logging The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 484413 The package can be fo

RFS: qsynth (updated package)

2008-06-07 Thread Sergey Rudchenko
Dear mentors, During the ubuntu package merging I have found that package qsynth is strongly outdated (0.2.5 from 2006-03-05 against 0.3.2 from 2007-12-1) and formed not so well (changes directly to the original source and numerous issues in debian/*). I have repackaged it from scratch carefully s

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Hello George, 2008/6/7 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >As a user of that package, I'm still reluctant to ship it in a shape > where > lintian is not happy enough. I've read your reasoning about debug package > names you have choosen, but I still don't see a good reason not to have >

Re: Help with arch-specific bug in mapnik package

2008-06-07 Thread The Fungi
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 02:12:12PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [...] > I'm not quite sure where to go with this one; not least because I > don't have a way to reproduce the problem [...] I have a Hewlett Packard Model 712/60 workstation running sid, to which I could give your RSA key login ac

Re: Help with arch-specific bug in mapnik package

2008-06-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any help or advice, therefore, would be greatly appreciated. The debian-hppa list might be able to offer hardware access or other help. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Help with arch-specific bug in mapnik package

2008-06-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hello, My package mapnik has an RC bug currently filed against it relating to the hppa architecture. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482829 It seems to hang as soon as the Python module is loaded. I'm not quite sure where to go with this one; not least because I don't have a way

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > 2008/6/6 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26, > > > > "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.

Re: beginner's questions

2008-06-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Dionysis Kalofonos wrote: > Thank you Daniel. For starting, read some basic docs in DDP/ http://www.debian.org/doc Debian Policy Developers Reference Debian GNU/Linux FAQ Debian New Maintainers' Guide Debian Reference (my main work) should get you s

Re: "Fixing" source-contains-cvs-{conflict-copy,control-dir}

2008-06-07 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:25:00 + (UTC), Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2008-06-07, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any opinion about this? Is there a consensus on how to behave? Is that a ma= > > tter of taste? > > Leave it and educate upstream. Yes, sure... only that upstream seems "dea

Re: "Fixing" source-contains-cvs-{conflict-copy,control-dir}

2008-06-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-06-07, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any opinion about this? Is there a consensus on how to behave? Is that a ma= > tter > of taste? Leave it and educate upstream. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

"Fixing" source-contains-cvs-{conflict-copy,control-dir}

2008-06-07 Thread David Paleino
Hi all, I'm adopting libnet (ITA #483710), and lintian -iI warns me about the two tags in subject: I: libnet source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir CVS ... I: libnet source: source-contains-cvs-conflict-copy sample/.#icmp_unreach.c.1.2 ... I've always submitted clean packages to mentors.debian.n

Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

2008-06-07 Thread Tobias Toedter
On Thursday 05 June 2008 10:50:47 Jeremiah Foster wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.5 > of my package "swedish". Hi Jeremiah, here are some comments on your package: - Please don't include automatically generated files in the tarball. Those are debhelper.log, postinst.

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 06 June 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26, > > "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > >> As Cyril stated in another post, you must (by policy) put this > >> information in debian/copyright. Sorry

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-06-07 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
2008/6/6 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26, > "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.2+dfsg1-1.dsc >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poc