Re: RFS: php-geoip (updated package)

2008-12-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Patrick Matthäi wrote: I had a look in your package and this makes me a headache: php-geoip (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. Fix security issue: + formatting bug in phpinfo() From the upstream changelog: * Small bug in phpinfo() when prin

Re: RFS: dekiwiki

2008-12-26 Thread Michele Baldessari
Hi Mathieu, On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:51 -0800, Mathieu OUDART wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dekiwiki". > > * Package name: dekiwiki > Version : 8.08.11123-1 > Upstream Author : servi...@mindtouch.com > * URL : www.mindtouch.com > * License

Re: RFS: php-geoip (updated package)

2008-12-26 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
В Чтв, 25/12/2008 в 19:08 +0100, Stefan Fritsch пишет: > But looking at the diff between 1.0.3 and 1.0.5 and at > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?r1=1.21&r2=1.22 , it > seems the crash bug was only introduced in 1.0.4, which was never > released. So there is nothing to fix in le

Re: RFS: dekiwiki

2008-12-26 Thread David Paleino
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:51:17 -0800, Mathieu OUDART wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dekiwiki". > > [..] > > It builds these binary packages: > dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono I haven't looked at the package, but you might be inter

RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Weboide
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "furl". * Package name: furl Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos aka Chris Williams * URL : http://www.gumbynet.org.uk/software/furl.html * License : GPL Section : utils It builds

Re: RFS: php-geoip (updated package)

2008-12-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Sergey B Kirpichev schrieb: > В Чтв, 25/12/2008 в 19:08 +0100, Stefan Fritsch пишет: >> But looking at the diff between 1.0.3 and 1.0.5 and at >> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?r1=1.21&r2=1.22 , it >> seems the crash bug was only introduced in 1.0.4, which was never >> released

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:29:29AM -0500, Weboide wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "furl". > IANADD and can't upload for you, sorry. But some comments for your review: In your packaging you have a compat level of 7 but don't use debhelper 7 to its potential; you should take

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Jonathan Wiltshire writes: > More fundamentally: > What does furl do that other packages can't? We already have curl, lynx, > wget and even telnet can be used to dump headers. Can you justify having > this package in the archive? Also, HEAD from the libwww-perl package, which is designed for exa

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Weboide
Thanks for replying this quick. I chose to package this because this was a RFP and it was a small and useful tool for getting HTTP headers, and doesn't use many libraries. I agree that some other programs do the same thing and surely more than that. What do you suggest? Should I stop working on i

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:00:04 -0500 Weboide wrote: > Thanks for replying this quick. > > I chose to package this because this was a RFP and it was a small and > useful tool for getting HTTP headers, and doesn't use many libraries. > I agree that some other programs do the same thing and surely mo

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > What if not? They stay open till someone else > > tries to package it and gets rejected? > > If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into > an upload, there is no reason to leave the RFP open. I think perh

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Jonathan Wiltshire schrieb: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: >>> What if not? They stay open till someone else >>> tries to package it and gets rejected? >> If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into >> an upload, there is no reason to leav