On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Why is it a static library instead of a shared one?
PS: libpkg-guide is a good shared library packaging reference, but be
aware of the two bugs filed against it.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
>This package has been updated, it now sets the default html for the csound
^path
>manual currently in NEW.
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qutecsound".
>
>* Package name: qutecsoun
In <30e395780906121522i273d74b8qe6bf4f35198e4...@mail.gmail.com>, Jeffrey
Ratcliffe wrote:
>Now it is not lintian clean. If I have the usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0
>libiulib.so.0 symlinks in libiulib0, then I get:
>
>W: libiulib0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0
>usr/lib/libi
2009/6/12 Paul Wise :
> Why is it a static library instead of a shared one?
Because that's how upstream set up the build process, and neither
upstream, nor I, knew enough about autoconf, automake and libtool to
make a shared library.
In the mean time, someone posted a working patch[1], and I have
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6".
>
> * Package name: jetty6
> Version : 6.1.18-1
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
>
Dear Charles
Many thanks for your reply on this.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:33:34PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:12:46AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
> [...]
> > The second question is, how to handle the copyright for the files in
> > intl/ and m4/ directorie
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "byacc-j".
* Package name: byacc-j
Version : 1.15-1
Upstream Author : Tomas Hurka
* URL : http://byaccj.sourceforge.net/
* License : public domain
Section : devel
It builds these binary package
Missing information...
Ludovic Claude a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6".
>
> * Package name: jetty6
> Version : 6.1.18-1
> Upstream Author : Mortbay Consulting
> * URL : http://jetty.mortbay.com/
> * License : Apa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6".
* Package name: jetty6
Version : 6.1.18-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : java
It bui
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I packaged libasyncns-0.7 and python-libasyncns-0.7.1
>
> I already have a DD for another package, so maybe he can upload them,
> but if I can get some comments before I ask him, that would be
> nice.
>
> * Package name: libasyncns0
> Version :
Benjamin Drung wrote:
> P: xmms2 source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system .gitignore
> and 5 more
>
> As written before, we use git to track patches. Most of these changes
> are cherry-picked.
IANADD, but this is hardly excuse to this issue, as for me. Users and
developers shouldn't need
Dear mentors,
I have updated the xmms2 package. Here you can find the dsc file:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmms2/xmms2_0.6DrMattDestruction-2.dsc
Now the package should be ready to be uploaded. I would be glad if
someone uploaded this package for me.
The package is not lintian f
I forgot to mention this PackageMap thing being developed for smolt
that you might want to inform upstream about:
http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=373
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Replying in this thread because I didn't receive any reply to my
direct emails and couldn't contact you on IRC; what is the status of
whohas? I'm especially interested in #523497 being fixed, but there
are a few wishlist items that would be nice to have and would probably
be easy for upstream to ad
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Please someone sponsor it. I've already reviewed the package some time
> ago, but I step back since I'm not sure about this library package, in
> particular because it's a static lib one.
Why is it a static library instead of a shared one?
-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 16:15, Jeffrey
Ratcliffe wrote:
> 2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>> I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny
>> debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a
>> mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8,
>> please ch
2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny
> debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a
> mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8,
> please check the correct version in changelog of debhelper) - it will
Dear mentors,
I am seeking a sponsor for this new package, gvpe. It builds an secure
virtual ethernet between multiple endpoints and gateways, rather than a
straight end-to-end VPN tunnel. This makes it more resilient to failures
of individual nodes participating in the network. I filed an RFP
ori
Hi Benjamin,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 14:36, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.1-1
> of my package "dvdbackup".
My only suggestion is taht dh7 and cdbs provides the same
functionalities, so you may want to remove cdbs and relay only on dh7
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.1-1
of my package "dvdbackup".
It builds these binary packages:
dvdbackup - tool to rip DVD's from the command line
dvdbackup-dbg - debug files for dvdbackup
The package is completely lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bug
[tobi, 2009-06-11]
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mupen64plus/mupen64plus_1.5+dfsg1-2.dsc
I will take a look today or tomorrow
--
http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Hi,
I just wanted to add some notes. Mupen64Plus is in my opinion the best working
n64 emulator on unix systems with an active upstream. mupen64plus is a fork of
the ~2005 stopped project mupen64[4] with many enhancements and bug-fixes. It
uses a plug-in architecture to make it easy to exchange
Le Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:12:46AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
>
> Now, my question is about filling the debian/copyright. The overall
> license for yapet is GPL-3+ with the OpenSSL exception. This was
> changed upstream, after I informed him, about that issue. Now I'm
> unsure in this c
24 matches
Mail list logo