Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? PS: libpkg-guide is a good shared library packaging reference, but be aware of the two bugs filed against it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: RFS: qutecsound (2nd try)

2009-06-12 Thread Felipe Sateler
>This package has been updated, it now sets the default html for the csound ^path >manual currently in NEW. > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qutecsound". > >* Package name: qutecsoun

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <30e395780906121522i273d74b8qe6bf4f35198e4...@mail.gmail.com>, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: >Now it is not lintian clean. If I have the usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >libiulib.so.0 symlinks in libiulib0, then I get: > >W: libiulib0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >usr/lib/libi

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
2009/6/12 Paul Wise : > Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? Because that's how upstream set up the build process, and neither upstream, nor I, knew enough about autoconf, automake and libtool to make a shared library. In the mean time, someone posted a working patch[1], and I have

Re: RFS: jetty6

2009-06-12 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6". > > * Package name: jetty6 > Version : 6.1.18-1 > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] >

Re: RFC for yapet filling debian/copyright

2009-06-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Dear Charles Many thanks for your reply on this. On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:33:34PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:12:46AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > [...] > > The second question is, how to handle the copyright for the files in > > intl/ and m4/ directorie

RFS: byacc-j

2009-06-12 Thread Ludovic Claude
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "byacc-j". * Package name: byacc-j Version : 1.15-1 Upstream Author : Tomas Hurka * URL : http://byaccj.sourceforge.net/ * License : public domain Section : devel It builds these binary package

Re: RFS: jetty6

2009-06-12 Thread Ludovic Claude
Missing information... Ludovic Claude a écrit : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6". > > * Package name: jetty6 > Version : 6.1.18-1 > Upstream Author : Mortbay Consulting > * URL : http://jetty.mortbay.com/ > * License : Apa

RFS: jetty6

2009-06-12 Thread Ludovic Claude
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jetty6". * Package name: jetty6 Version : 6.1.18-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : java It bui

Re: libasyncns / python-libasyncns

2009-06-12 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Yann Leboulanger wrote: > Hi all, > > I packaged libasyncns-0.7 and python-libasyncns-0.7.1 > > I already have a DD for another package, so maybe he can upload them, > but if I can get some comments before I ask him, that would be > nice. > > * Package name: libasyncns0 > Version :

Re: RFS: xmms2 (updated package)

2009-06-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Benjamin Drung wrote: > P: xmms2 source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system .gitignore > and 5 more > > As written before, we use git to track patches. Most of these changes > are cherry-picked. IANADD, but this is hardly excuse to this issue, as for me. Users and developers shouldn't need

Re: RFS: xmms2 (updated package)

2009-06-12 Thread Benjamin Drung
Dear mentors, I have updated the xmms2 package. Here you can find the dsc file: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmms2/xmms2_0.6DrMattDestruction-2.dsc Now the package should be ready to be uploaded. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. The package is not lintian f

Re: RFS: gvpe, the GNU Virtual Private Ethernet daemon

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
I forgot to mention this PackageMap thing being developed for smolt that you might want to inform upstream about: http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=373 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: RFS: gvpe, the GNU Virtual Private Ethernet daemon

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
Replying in this thread because I didn't receive any reply to my direct emails and couldn't contact you on IRC; what is the status of whohas? I'm especially interested in #523497 being fixed, but there are a few wishlist items that would be nice to have and would probably be easy for upstream to ad

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Please someone sponsor it. I've already reviewed the package some time > ago, but I step back since I'm not sure about this library package, in > particular because it's a static lib one. Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? -

Unidentified subject!

2009-06-12 Thread Alexandre Delanoë
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 16:15, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > 2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso : >> I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny >> debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a >> mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8, >> please ch

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso : > I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny > debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a > mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8, > please check the correct version in changelog of debhelper) - it will

RFS: gvpe, the GNU Virtual Private Ethernet daemon

2009-06-12 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Dear mentors, I am seeking a sponsor for this new package, gvpe. It builds an secure virtual ethernet between multiple endpoints and gateways, rather than a straight end-to-end VPN tunnel. This makes it more resilient to failures of individual nodes participating in the network. I filed an RFP ori

Re: RFS: dvdbackup (updated package)

2009-06-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Benjamin, On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 14:36, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.1-1 > of my package "dvdbackup". My only suggestion is taht dh7 and cdbs provides the same functionalities, so you may want to remove cdbs and relay only on dh7

RFS: dvdbackup (updated package)

2009-06-12 Thread Benjamin Drung
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.1-1 of my package "dvdbackup". It builds these binary packages: dvdbackup - tool to rip DVD's from the command line dvdbackup-dbg - debug files for dvdbackup The package is completely lintian clean. The upload would fix these bug

Re: ITS: mupen64plus 1.5+dfsg1-2

2009-06-12 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[tobi, 2009-06-11] > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mupen64plus/mupen64plus_1.5+dfsg1-2.dsc I will take a look today or tomorrow -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: RFS: mupen64plus

2009-06-12 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Hi, I just wanted to add some notes. Mupen64Plus is in my opinion the best working n64 emulator on unix systems with an active upstream. mupen64plus is a fork of the ~2005 stopped project mupen64[4] with many enhancements and bug-fixes. It uses a plug-in architecture to make it easy to exchange

Re: RFC for yapet filling debian/copyright

2009-06-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:12:46AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > > Now, my question is about filling the debian/copyright. The overall > license for yapet is GPL-3+ with the OpenSSL exception. This was > changed upstream, after I informed him, about that issue. Now I'm > unsure in this c