Mike Hommey writes:
> He meant that in this particular case, the UNRELEASED and unstabler
> discrepancy *is* in the .changes file. See
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
Yeah, Charles also pointed that out to me. I get it now -- that's
definitely enough to write
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:54:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michal Čihař writes:
> > Russ Allbery napsal(a):
>
> >> We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as
> >> the distribution so that people could run it on each build and know
> >> that any output meant a prob
Le Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:12:21PM +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> Probably a stupid question, but anyway, I have a question regarding mime
> support. In my package I use the icon-generic field, but this field has
> only be included in shared-mime-info version 0.40. Should I ask
> debian-devel if
Michal Čihař writes:
> Russ Allbery napsal(a):
>> We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as
>> the distribution so that people could run it on each build and know
>> that any output meant a problem. Unfortunately, that creates the
>> possibility for something like th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8+dfsg-4
of the package "pauker".
It builds these binary packages:
pauker - generic card based learning program
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 541341
The package can be found on mentor
Hi
Dne Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:24:40 -0700
Russ Allbery napsal(a):
> We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as the
> distribution so that people could run it on each build and know that any
> output meant a problem. Unfortunately, that creates the possibility for
> somet
Charles Plessy writes:
> Very good point. So only the changelog is borken.
> I built the package with its UNRELEASED changelog with sbuild, which
> puts the schroot's name in the Distribution field of the changes control
> file. The inconsistency with the changelog went unnoticed by our
> tools.
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Excerpts from gregor herrmann's message of Thu Aug 20 11:53:56 -0700 2009:
> Wow, cool, thanks a lot!
No problem.
> Can you image to take a look at the Developers' Reference too? AFAIK
> the only mentioning of teams there is in 5.12
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:15:00 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > The interesting question is how to encourage people to join teams;
> > some thoughts from DebConf can be found here:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/07/msg00083.html
> > (especially point 3)
> One thought captured in those notes
In <20090820133354.gb2...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>The reason why I posted to both is that I see a trend in -mentors that
>many new contributors seem to create an artificial need as a reason to
>get their contributions in the distribution and choose to package a new
>program.
Instead you
Excerpts from gregor herrmann's message of Thu Aug 20 02:25:09 -0700 2009:
> There's a central place for teams in Debian:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
That's an excellent resource, yes.
> The interesting question is how to encourage people to join teams;
> some thoughts from DebConf can be fou
Hello,
I hope it helps...
2009/8/20 Laurent Guignard :
> To solve this bug, i need detailled documentation about "ioctl" C function and
> SIOCGIFCONF and SIOCGIFADDR parameters of this function.
> I will have to work on this and i need documentation to solve bug and
> integrate other update to pu
In <20090820120036.ga4...@portable.home.famille-guignard.org>, Laurent
Guignard wrote:
>I am the maintainer of a package (dhcp-probe [1]) which is an upstream
> dedicated software (Solaris dedicated).
>A function doesn't work on Linux system based and give the bug [2].
>To solve this bug, i need d
Le Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> The changes file says Distribution: unstable:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
Very good point. So only the changelog is borken.
I built the package with its UNRELEASED changelog with sbuild, whi
The changes file says Distribution: unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
No idea how you did that nor what the consequences are.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
Hi, Gregor and everybody else.
On Aug 20 2009, gregor herrmann wrote:
> [Any reason why this thread happens on both -devel and -mentors?]
I am not subscribed to -devel (only to -mentors; I asked to be CC'ed on
the original message).
The reason why I posted to both is that I see a trend in -mento
Le Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:32:20PM +, Archive Administrator a écrit :
>
> Accepted:
> velvet-example_0.7.50-1_all.deb
> to pool/main/v/velvet/velvet-example_0.7.50-1_all.deb
> velvet_0.7.50-1.diff.gz
> to pool/main/v/velvet/velvet_0.7.50-1.diff.gz
> velvet_0.7.50-1.dsc
> to pool/main/v/v
Don Raikes escribió:
> Is there an example of a package that doesn't require the "compilation" of
> source to generate but just copies files to the target location?
Depends of kind of application. But there are good examples like:
phpmyadmin, phpldapadmin, maybe drupal...
Bye
--
http://www.mog
Hi mentors,
I am the maintainer of a package (dhcp-probe [1]) which is an upstream dedicated
software (Solaris dedicated).
A function doesn't work on Linux system based and give the bug [2].
To solve this bug, i need detailled documentation about "ioctl" C function and
SIOCGIFCONF and SIOCGIFADDR
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 20 août 2009 à 19:07 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Perhaps a good way to point it out on an ongoing basis would be a
> > central clearing house for “specific teams that a newcomer should
> > consider joining”. Is there such a list (and where is it maintained
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:07:42 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
[Any reason why this thread happens on both -devel and -mentors?]
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> > seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> > the
Le jeudi 20 août 2009 à 19:07 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Perhaps a good way to point it out on an ongoing basis would be a
> central clearing house for “specific teams that a newcomer should
> consider joining”. Is there such a list (and where is it maintained)?
> Would such a list even make se
Josselin Mouette writes:
> It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> the archive, consider joining one of the packaging teams looking for
> more maintainers: eglibc, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Xfce, Utopia,
Josselin Mouette writes:
> It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> the archive, consider joining one of the packaging teams looking for
> more maintainers: eglibc, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Xfce, Utopia,
Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 08:55 -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
> | It is with sadness that I see many NEW packages uploaded to the Debian
> | repository and little thought about some packages that are already in
> | the distribution, but that are bit-rotting.
> |
> | Please, if an existing packa
Le Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:30:32PM -0700, Don Raikes a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In the process of reading the webapps-policy manual, I got to the last page
> where a couple of tools were refferenced.
>
> Namely debconf-common and webapps-common.
>
> I looked using aptitude and couldn't find anything t
26 matches
Mail list logo
