On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:42:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote:
*Any* package installing files into /var/www violates FHS/policy as
that's the web root for the system admin, not the maintainer. Thus the
changes in the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package frePPLe.
FrePPLe stands for Free Production Planning Library. It is a
toolkit/framework for modeling and solving production planning
problems, just growing out its beta stages and ready for prime-time
use in the manufacturing industry.
-
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:37:46AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
I have added a README.debian explaining the directory changes, and the
way to configure iptotal with apache2.
(I also modified the README.source file to state quilt instead of dpatch.)
Yeah, about that... you're using 3.0
Dear mentors,
I am writing once more to ask for a sponsor for my package lmfit.
* Package name: lmfit
Version : 3.2-1
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://www.messen-und-deuten.de/lmfit/lmfit.html
* License : public domain
Section : libs
It
2010/3/30 Wuttke, Joachim j.wut...@fz-juelich.de:
Dear mentors,
I am writing once more to ask for a sponsor for my package lmfit.
* Package name : lmfit
Version : 3.2-1
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://www.messen-und-deuten.de/lmfit/lmfit.html
* License
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why
don't you use dh7 style debian/rules? I mean, you don't have to, but you
can avoid the whole DEB_*_GNU_TYPE stuff and shorten your rules file to
a few lines.
Hi, sorry but still have a .pc directory in diff.gz, and format file
should be into debian/source directory
both errors should now be corrected.
- Joachim
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why
don't you use dh7 style debian/rules? I mean, you don't have to, but you
can avoid the whole
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why
don't you use dh7 style
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:05:09 +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
autotools-dev has debhelper helpers/addons since 20100122.1, so
dh --with autotools_dev $@ (and an appropriate versioned build dep)
should be enough.
Wow, never saw that. Thanks for mentioning!
It's rather new, and I saw it in
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Andreas Ronnquist gus...@gusnan.se wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my SciteProj package:
...
The upload would fix these bugs: 513231.
Your subject indicates this is an updated package, but it isn't yet in
the archive, please don't do the same in future
Hi all,
I have a package which links against kdepim using this CMake
include(FindKdepimLibs) and seems to get the wrong include line:
Linking CXX shared library lib/libkcal_caldav.so
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lkdepim
Search the archives shows that kdepim-dev is the development libraries
for
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:29:01 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Andreas Ronnquist gus...@gusnan.se wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my SciteProj package:
...
The upload would fix these bugs: 513231.
Your subject indicates this is an updated
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:21:39 +0200
Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote:
So my question is: How can I fix this?
To answer my own question: Simply by removing a hard-coded reference to
link against kdepim:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael at
Hi
2010/3/29 Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de:
Angel Abad angela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi mentors, I maintain dajaxice package, but the upstream author has
changed the name to django-dajaxice.
What is the best option? Maintain the actual source name in package?
or change it to
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:41:49 -0430, Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc
wrote:
Hi mentors,
Hi Miguel,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libspring-webflow-2.0-java.
* Package name: libspring-webflow-2.0-java
Version : 2.0.8.RELEASE-1
Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Hi Damien, thanks for review this package.
I'm interested in sponsoring your package.
I'll try to have a look at it this evening or tomorow.
FYI, you might check your Homepage field (debian/control) :
Hello Mentors,
As noted in the previous email, I would like to become a maintainer for
this package, but am painfully unaware of the steps/protocols to do so.
Can I please have some help?
Thanks
Jon York
Original Message
Subject:Re: Varkon CAD software
Date:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-6
of my package adesklets.
It builds these binary packages:
adesklets - interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window System
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 477485, 553624, 553714
The
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package phing.
* Package name: phing
Version : 2.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid lt;h...@xmpl.orggt;
* URL : http://phing.info/
* License : LGPG-3
Section : devel
It builds these binary
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why
don't you use dh7 style
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:54 PM, jon j...@foretruss.com wrote:
As noted in the previous email, I would like to become a maintainer for this
package, but am painfully unaware of the steps/protocols to do so.
Can I please have some help?
Check out these links:
22 matches
Mail list logo
