Re: RFS: amispammer

2010-05-01 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Julián Moreno Patiño darkju...@gmail.com writes: * Package name   : amispammer   Version : 3.1-1 The upload would fix these bugs: 579499 I am not a DD and cannot upload your package, but though I would give some comments: · debian/rules: The override_dh_auto_install target is

Re: RFS: amispammer

2010-05-01 Thread Julián Moreno Patiño
Hi Ansgar, 2010/5/1 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org Hi, Julián Moreno Patiño darkju...@gmail.com writes: * Package name : amispammer Version : 3.1-1 The upload would fix these bugs: 579499 I am not a DD and cannot upload your package, but though I would give some

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in postinst?

2010-05-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
Ignacio Valdes wrote: So here is the use case, one that to my knowledge rpm or deb do not provide much guidance for and deb does not provide control fields for: Package is a vehicle for installing software that can create multiple instances. Further, those instances can be very long lived

Re: RFS: Various GNUstep packages; looking for a general sponsor

2010-05-01 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:59:05 +0200 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org ha scritto: I kindly ask anyone who is interested to consider sponsoring the below packages, and eventually future uploads of core GNUstep (-make, -base, -gui, -back), hopefully plus other less important ones. Thanks in

Re: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging)

2010-05-01 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes tfmor...@cti.gov.br wrote: ... I have limited experience with python packages but the principle is that the *.pyc files will be created at package install time in the postinst script.  This is done by python-support and is described in the

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in postinst?

2010-05-01 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Moving on. As suggested I am simply going to have to hack/kludge rpm and deb with a bunch of sed pre-processing of the respective spec, control and postinst to make it work. These two divergent schemes put a large burden of effort on developers and documenters. Wish I could get deb and rpm folks

RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.9dfsg-1~bpo50+1]

2010-05-01 Thread Michael Diers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dear mentors/backporters, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.9dfsg-1~bpo50+1 of my package subversion. Since 2010-01-31, the version in testing is 1.6.9dfsg-1. This backport omits the optional ra_serf repository access method

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in postinst?

2010-05-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr writes: then in your debian/rules build rule, you can do something like: MY_VERS=`head -n 1 debian/changelog | cut -d'(' -f2 | cut -d')' -f1 | cut -d'-' -f1` MY_DEB_REL=`head -n 1 debian/changelog | cut -d'(' -f2 | cut -d')' -f1 | cut -d'-' -f2`