Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> It is, yes! I didn't even have to spot it myself, licensecheck did :-)
> Well, licensecheck told me that there was MIT-licensed code in
> this folder, which made me take a closer look.
> In fact, your debian/copyright file will ha
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.18-3
of my package "calcoo". Just a upgrade.
It builds these binary packages:
calcoo - Scientific calculator (GTK+)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.3-12
of my package "wav2cdr".
It builds these binary packages:
wav2cdr- Converts wav files into CD-ROM audio file format
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/2010 01:00 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I did a quick review:
>
> 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or
Done
> 2) You use features of mozilla-devscripts 0.22 [2]. Please adjust the
> Build-Depends.
Done
> 3) "${xpi:Re
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
wrote:
> I agree in the most part. I have added the suggested changelog entries
> and reuploaded the package to mentors. I hope this is fine now.
Uploaded. I've wrapped the changelog to 80 columns before that,
to get rid of lintian warning.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> I got no comments on this package so far. The current package is more
> than 3 years old and a lot of bugs and usability issues were fixed
> since then. And as we're at it I've just updated the package to the
> new 1.0.4 release.
Some c
El 30/10/10 04:31, Ansgar Burchardt escribió:
Hi,
Daniel Echeverry writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-3 of my package
"9menu".
I did take a look at your package. Some comments:
· debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line.
· debian/compat: You bu
On 10/31/2010 12:03 AM, chrysn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> I have recently sponsored your packages downloadstatusbar and visolate.
>
> thanks; i've received the messages, just waited for the package to pass
> through NEW for confirmation.
>
>> A
Am Samstag, den 30.10.2010, 18:31 +0200 schrieb Gabriele Giacone:
> > Anyway, renamed.
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ubiquity-mozilla/ubiquity-mozilla_0.6-1.dsc
I did a quick review:
1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or
xul-ext-ubiquity). We don't
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I have recently sponsored your packages downloadstatusbar and visolate.
thanks; i've received the messages, just waited for the package to pass
through NEW for confirmation.
> As many others are still looking for sponsors for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/30/2010 06:53 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt
>> what happens if source package name already exist
Hi again,
[...]
>
> > - ovito includes an embedded code copy of muparser
> > (src/atomviz/utils/muparser/), which is available as a Debian
> > package and should be used instead.
>
> I would have never found this myself. How did you noticed it?
> The embedded code is still in the source, but
[...]
>
> I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
> sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably should have
> taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
> those people another email.
>
[...]
Done as [1].
> On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of
> > packages
> > that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some
> > package" is
> > pretty awkward...
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michael
> >
Hi Williams and chrysn,
I have recently sponsored your packages downloadstatusbar and visolate. As many
others are still looking for sponsors for their packages, and in a follow-up to
[1], I would like to ask you to give back to the community, if you feel happy
about your package having been uploa
On 27/10/10 23:00, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
>> With some window managers and/or when closing many roxterm tabs rapidly
>> with keyboard auto-repeat, closing tabs may cause the window to shrink,
>> reducing the number of columns and/or ro
I agree in the most part. I have added the suggested changelog entries
and reuploaded the package to mentors. I hope this is fine now.
Regards,
Chris.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:21:31AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> wrote:
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
wrote:
> The dropped patches ARE ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE NEW UPSTREAM RELEASE. Should
> they
> recorded to the changelog file? What if I had 1 patches applied to a new
> upstream
> release along with new package features? Should I log a
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt
> what happens if source package name already exists and how to manage
> that on ubuntu side: I guess blacklisting as requested by Luca then
> proba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/30/2010 03:34 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 07:41 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
We try and maintain a symbiotic relationship with Debian. If we fix
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:41:40PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Fixed the above twp changes and reuploaded to mentors.
> >
> > Err.. Wait
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> wrote:
>
>> Fixed the above twp changes and reuploaded to mentors.
>
> Err.. Wait a second. When logging about dropped patches, please
> be specific which ones are dropped.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> And while we are at it, following changes are still missing:
> - The "Homepage:" field addition
> - The "Recommends: pulseaudio" field
I mean, their changelog entries are still missing. The changes
themselves are already there.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
wrote:
> Fixed the above twp changes and reuploaded to mentors.
Err.. Wait a second. When logging about dropped patches, please
be specific which ones are dropped. "4 previous patches" are too
broad.
And while we are at it, following changes
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:09:35PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:17:36PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
>
> > Ok I should repackage it and produce a patch for this minor change.
>
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:17:36PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> Ok I should repackage it and produce a patch for this minor change.
OK. It looks good now.
>> OK. So, you can install morseX11.1 and morseLinux.1 without
>
Hi,
2010/10/29 Michael Tautschnig :
> I have briefly reviewed your package and it seems the following
> should be fixed before uploading to the archives:
Great, thank you for your effort and the comments!
> - ovito includes an embedded code copy of muparser
> (src/atomviz/utils/muparser/), whic
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:17:36PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:57:09AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 08:53:14PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to verify and upload the new 1.0.3-1
> version of midish.
>
> It builds a single package:
>
> midish - shell-like MIDI sequencer/filter
>
> The package is lintian clean, and avai
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:57:09AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:02:33PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
>>
>> Your
Hi,
Tony Palma writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2a-8 of my package
> "lightspeed".
I did take a brief look at your package (not a full review) and here are
some comments:
· debian/changelog: What change does
* Obsolete package removed since 1.2a-6. Closes: #60135
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 02:16, The Fungi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> [...]
>> Is it always an upstream package worst than a repackaged package?
> [...]
>
>>From what I've seen, in most cases, yes.
>
> I
Hi,
Daniel Echeverry writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-3 of my package
> "9menu".
I did take a look at your package. Some comments:
· debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line.
· debian/compat: You build-depend on debhelper 7, but use compat
le
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:57:09AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:02:33PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> >> wrote:
>
Quoting "Michael Tautschnig" :
Hi Michael,
I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably
should have
taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
those people anothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
> that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package"
> is
> pretty awkward...
>
> Bes
Hello,
On Friday 29 October 2010 at 20:13:21, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 08:34:25 Paul Wise escribió:
[...]
> > I think I'll also do a workshop about reviewing packages at the
> > MiniDebConf in Vietnam. Does anyone think that an online workshop (IRC
> > or similar)
[...]
> >
> > Hmm, how can we encourage non-DDs to review packages.
> >
> > I'm thinking it might work to offer sponsorship in exchange for
> > reviews. So, a DD reviews a package from maintainer. If there are no
> > blockers to the upload, the DD says, "looks good, review someone elses
> > pack
38 matches
Mail list logo
