Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-11-03 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:00:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit : On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: RFS has something similar in concept to pull requests. How about including in the RFS emails a link to the most relevant diff in the web inte

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) responsei

2010-11-03 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Michael Tautschnig wrote: [...] I think that, as far as false positives: we should just reply to all the messages. For better or for worse, people will look at mailing list archives and get a feel for what our community is like. (That's my opinion, anyway.) It's clear to m

English localisation help for Debian package maintainers (was: RFS: dalle)

2010-11-03 Thread Ben Finney
Alberto Fernández writes: > It's my horrible English. I must practice. […] > The comment is now in English and localized to Spanish to. Feel free to request help with English-language localisation on the appropriate forum http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/> for any of your Debian packa

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-03 Thread Marco Bavagnoli
On 11/03/2010 11:14 PM, Ben Finney wrote: Marco Bavagnoli writes: I also added debian/watch file that contain this: version=3 http://sf.net/googleimagedown/mediadownloader-v(.*)-src\.tar\.gz Unless you want to match an empty version, the above specification should be more restrictive:

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-03 Thread Alberto Fernández
El mié, 03-11-2010 a las 10:55 +0100, Mònica escribió: Thanks very much for your help. I've just uploaded a fixed package with your suggestions. > Hello, > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 01:23:13, Alberto Fernández wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-03 Thread Ben Finney
Marco Bavagnoli writes: > I also added debian/watch file that contain this: > > version=3 > http://sf.net/googleimagedown/mediadownloader-v(.*)-src\.tar\.gz Unless you want to match an empty version, the above specification should be more restrictive: version=3 http://sf.net/googleimage

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Anthony Vital
I don't know if you want a particular format for the patch, but here's one. Anthony rename_binary_wicd-kde.patch Description: Binary data

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:29:00 +0100, Anthony Vital wrote: > [..] > Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. So > I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon > because I just released a new one a couple of days ago. But if needed, I can > m

Re: RFS: hotot

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Gevers
> * instead of overriding dh_installman, you could just as well have a > line "debian/hotot.1" in the debian/manpages file (it wouldn't work > that easily with the Changelog, as you'd have to move it eg. to > debian/upstream_changelog/changelog so it can be added to debian/docs > without re

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
2010/11/3 Anthony Vital > > Ah, I didn't know that. I've never even noticed there was a wicd-gtk > binary ;) > Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. So > I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon > because I just released a new on

Re: RFS: fldiff (ITA package)

2010-11-03 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Hi! Tanks for your interest. > - Your orig.tar.gz file seems to differ from the one in unstable. >You should use the same one ; if you need to make changes >affecting the upstream part of your package (ie everything except >debian/*), this should be done separately. As yo

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Anthony Vital
Hi, > The wicd-client binary is just a wrapper, that runs wicd-curses or > wicd-gtk, > depending on whether X is available or not. > > wicd-gtk is really a separate client, /usr/bin/wicd-gtk . > Also /usr/bin/wicd-curses is a client, and /usr/bin/wicd-cli is another. > I see /usr/bin/wicd-client

Re: Using Quilt with a new package

2010-11-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Scott Howard writes: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: >> Le Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Daniel Lombraña González a écrit : >>> >>> After that, I kept reading about git-buildpackage and it seems that it >>> should be more easy to maintain those differences betwee

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:03:17 +0100, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > El 3 de noviembre de 2010 13:05, Iker Salmón San Millán > escribió: > > > I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, > > but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review of the package. >

Re: package transition question

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM, The Fungi wrote: > Alternatives would be (more user friendly) come up with a > configuration translator if all existing options can have a 1-to-1 > transform/mapping to new options or syntax, You can use Config::Model to facilitate such configuration upgrades. The

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
El 3 de noviembre de 2010 13:05, Iker Salmón San Millán escribió: > > I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, > but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review of the package. > > Here is the response: >Well technically this is a KDE App, which heavil

Re: RFS: sciteproj

2010-11-03 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:41:33 +0200 Andreas Ronnquist wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:23:31 +0200 > Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > Sorry for a somewhat late reply. > > > > [...] > > > > First, please allow me to ask whether you also contacted the maintainer of > > SciTE in

Re: Using Quilt with a new package

2010-11-03 Thread Scott Howard
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Daniel Lombraña González a écrit : >> >> After that, I kept reading about git-buildpackage and it seems that it >> should be more easy to maintain those differences between the upstream >> version and

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-03 Thread Marco Bavagnoli
I uploaded the new package to mentors without any lintian warnings. Thanks to you all here the link http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediadownloader/ Regards Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: fldiff (ITA package)

2010-11-03 Thread Etienne Millon
Hello, I had a look at your package, here are a few remarks. Please note that I am not a DD, so I won't be able to upload your package. My advice may also be incomplete and/or incorrect, but let's hope not. - Your orig.tar.gz file seems to differ from the one in unstable. You should use

Re: RFS: minidlna

2010-11-03 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Michael, Sorry for the delay, but I've been awfully busy over the week end. Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > It seems like a clever thing to do in {pre,post}inst: there's no need to > > create a default minidlna user:group if something else is already set in > > the default file; I'm just unsure

Re: package transition question

2010-11-03 Thread The Fungi
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 11:59:27AM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: [...] > Our current idea is to do the installation, run the program in > postinst to check for config errors and if we find some we issue a > warning message and cease to restart the daemon - or does anybody > have a better idea? Basica

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hi, 2010/11/3 Iker Salmón San Millán : > I also have a question.  If we (me, mentors, sponsors, DD, upstream...) > finally decide to change the name i guess i should send a new itp bug with > the new name and close this one,  shouldn't I? I believe you can just rename the ITP. Regards, -- To U

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-03 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
I've uploaded tha package again. I think i've corrected all the mistakes mentioned in previous emails. I've also added "provides: wicd-client" in debian/control. I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-03 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hey, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote: > the url on sf.net is this: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/googleimagedown/files/ > > and source is named like mediadownloader_v1.4.2-src.tar.gz > Is the watch file content correct ? Take a look at uscan(1), there are examples for S

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-03 Thread Marco Bavagnoli
On 11/02/2010 09:51 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote: I fixed most of the warning, but 1 of them and 1 information with a spelling error are still there. I run lintian -Ii on the .deb, as result I got this: W: mediadownloader: new-package-sh

package transition question

2010-11-03 Thread Harald Jenny
Hi all, I'm facing a problem and thought maybe someone here has a solution or could point me into the right direction: The package openswan currently has version 2.4.12 in Lenny whereas in Squeeze version 2.6.28 will appear. As the version number suggest this means some deep changes, also concerni

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-03 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Mònica wrote: > * debian/control > - Some spelling mistakes in the long description: splited -> split, > Dalle support -> Dalle suports ^^^ supports -- Jonathan Wiltshire 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3

Re: RFS: dalle

2010-11-03 Thread Mònica
Hello, On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 01:23:13, Alberto Fernández wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dalle". > > * Package name: dalle > Version : 0.10.11 > Upstream Author : Alberto Fernández Martínez > * URL : http://dalle.sourc

Re: Using Quilt with a new package

2010-11-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Daniel Lombraña González a écrit : > > After that, I kept reading about git-buildpackage and it seems that it > should be more easy to maintain those differences between the upstream > version and the deb one using patches. However, I don't know how I > ha