söndag den 29 maj 2011 klockan 16:53 skrev Lars Wirzenius detta:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> use whatever you feel best like. The spec suggests something like this:
>
> http://s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kildclient".
* Package name: kildclient
Version : 2.11.1-1
Upstream Author : me (Eduardo M Kalinowski)
* URL : http://kildclient.sourceforge.net/
* License :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aspell-sr".
* Package name: aspell-sr
Version : 0.02-1
Upstream Author : Goran Rakic
* URL : http://srpski.org/aspell/
* License : LGPL
Section :
"Andrew O. Shadoura" writes:
> It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> debian/copyright.
I personally don't agree. I think DEP-5 is easier to read because it's
the same as every other package that uses DEP-5 (well, once we get the
format hammered out), so I can quickl
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Uploaded.
> Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo
> of collab-maint ...
Hmpf. Is this really a permission denied to write to the repo or did you use
ssh with password-auth in the past? I've seen som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stefan,
On 29.05.2011 20:49, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
>> * You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this
>> separately.
>
> Even if the perl module is only used by the scripts packaged? I created
> the module when several progr
Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 20:22:
> Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's
> a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this
> inflicted by this new "don't break testing cause it's rolling" mantra?
> As long as it's not security relevan
Dies schrieb Arno Töll (deb...@toell.net):
> * You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this
> separately.
Even if the perl module is only used by the scripts packaged? I created
the module when several programs used the same functions and configuration
data, so I am not su
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Hi,
> Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52:
>
> > * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes
> > and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should
> > be used.
>
> There is
Hello Sven,
thanks for your time.
Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52:
> * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes
> and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should
> be used.
There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't anymore and if s
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 01:05:02 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy?
> I think it's great the way it is right now already...
Isn't it way too machine-oriented to be in the policy?
It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
On 05/29/2011 11:53 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
>> I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
>> hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
>> the copyright file is complete I don
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
[...]
> Also done.
Shame on me but I missed two other things, I would've commited them to the
collab-maint repo but that seems to still miss the the changes in the
package.
* I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no secu
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
> the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of
> this DEP.
This is
Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 13:41:
> * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available.
> I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without
> the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to
> package. :)
Sorry, false copy a
Hi,
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8
> of my package "librsync".
The package looks good.
Have you found a sponsor?
--
Kanru
pgpJyp9DMaepQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1
of my package "piwigo".
I used to have a mentor (Sylvain Le Gall ) for that
package but he is disconnected from internet for a long time.
It builds these binary packages:
piwigo - photo gallery software for the web
The pa
Hi,
I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of
this DEP.
It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be
used.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my
> package "squidguard".
* Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available.
I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d
Hello Markus,
i really appreciate your attempt to create some debian packages for the
SocketCAN utilities and the PEAK driver!
(FYI: the PEAK driver is now maintained by Stephane Grosjean)
Some more comments inside the text:
> From: Markus Becker
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject
Hi people,
I have a clone git repository here which consists of several TEI encoded XML
files for Sanskrit
philology (https://github.com/paddymcall/SARIT):
$ ls SARIT/
astangahrdayasamhita.xml brahmapurana.xml debian manusmrti.xml
ratnakIrti-nibandhAvali.xml schemas
ayurvedasutram.xml caryame
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libzipper".
* Package name: libzipper
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Michael McMaster (myself)
* URL : http://www.codesrc.com/src/libzipper
* License : GPLv3+
Section : libs
It builds th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my
package "squidguard".
It builds these binary packages:
squidguard - filter and redirector plugin for Squid
squidguard-doc - filter and redirector plugin for Squid - Documentation
The package appears to be lintian clean.
T
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Federico Giménez Nieto wrote:
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1
> of my package "doctrine".
I'm not sure how the .orig.tar.gz has been generated (didn't digg deeper)
but it contains a lot of 1970's files which will result in an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1
of my package "doctrine".
It builds these binary packages:
doctrine - Tool for object-relational mapping in PHP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 590006, 594410. It will also prevent
C
On Sun, 29 May 2011 14:17:08 +1000, Ian Haywood wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Ian,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gambas3". [..]
I had used Gambas in the past, and would be happy to sponsor it (didn't review
it yet).
However, gambas2 is maintained by José. Have you talked to him a
26 matches
Mail list logo