Hi
On 2011-07-11 23:46, Samuel Lidén Borell wrote:
>
>> Please recheck with lintian, I'm getting a couple of warnings here:
>> W: fribid source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
>> W: fribid source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
>>
>> Please check debi
>Please recheck with lintian, I'm getting a couple of warnings here:
> W: fribid source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W: fribid source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
>
>Please check debian/copyright. Seems like you are missing some entries...
>
On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Andreas Moog writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (whic
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>>> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>>> http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
>>> http://lists.
Hi David,
[...]
> > Given that, according to the discussion in #156, some earlier version had
> > apparently worked fine: couldn't the Debian package simply revert that
> > "optimization" that requires GC_DONT_ADD_BYTE_AT_END?
>
> At the time this was implemented it was quite a significant change
Hello Alessandro
> Duh. Makes sense... Some similar packages (e.g. banshee and amarok) are in
> "sound", but I can't say what's the best solution.
I'll look around what has been chosen for other media players.
> That's what Suggests/Recommends are made for. E.g. Rhythmbox Recommends
> rhythmb
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andreas Moog wrote:
> Is it really considered necessary to override a wishlist/--pedantic
> lintian tag?
Definitely not.
It also is not correct to override lintian when it is correct.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>> http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/0
On 07/11/2011 09:12 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>>> So overwrite it.
>>
>> I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
>
> You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
> libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
>
> and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-override
Olaf Dietsche wrote on
2011-07-11 20:17:
> > So overwrite it.
>
> I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-overrides with the line:
Hi Olaf,
> Michael Tautschnig writes:
>
> > Could you please briefly explain why you are NMUing this package? Are you
> > intending to take over package maintainership? What about the previous
> > maintainer?
>
> No, I don't want to take over the package. The maintainer is still
> maintaining l
Uwe Kleine-König writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>
>> > P: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
>> > P: libgeier0: no-upstream-changelog
>>
>> Doesn't make sense, since upstream changelog is empty.
> So overwrite it.
I don't understand that. What do y
Hi Michael,
On 10/07/11 22:39, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I'm sorry, I haven't yet reviewed your package, I'm only commenting on the
> issues you raised.
No problem, I appreciate it.
>> For reference, I have attempted to build against a libgc using a default
>> configuration and it breaks badly
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> >> I am hoping to understand the "obsolete" flag on conffiles in the dpkg
> >> status file. There are many packages that include this flag at the
> >> end of the line. For example:
> [...]
> >
> > They are obsolete because they
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:58:17PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
> > + IMHO the Section should be "sound" instead of "x11".
>
> "sound" doesn't seem to fit right, because xnoise is a media player
> and also does video. If you find something more fitting, please
> comment.
Duh. Makes sense... Some si
On 07/09/2011 10:30 PM, Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>
> [ lots of valid arguments ]
>
>
I think you got me (at least partly) convince on the short dh style.
However, I reamain convince that Jakub's point to not nitpicking
new comers on the dh versus dh_* style is very valid.
Thanks for the in
Le lundi 11 juillet 2011 16:58:17, shuerhaaken a écrit :
> Hello Alessandro Ghedini,
>
> I tried to implement all your points. I reuploaded the packages to
> debian mentors.
>
> I have some comments to your testings, see below:
> > + IMHO the Section should be "sound" instead of "x11".
>
> "sou
Hi Michael,
> > Hi!
> >
> > These packages are waiting for a sponsor:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco and
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dacco.
> >
> > This is a Catalan-English dictionary and a query GUI.
> >
> [...]
>
> I've just uploaded dacco, looks go
Hello Alessandro Ghedini,
I tried to implement all your points. I reuploaded the packages to
debian mentors.
I have some comments to your testings, see below:
> + IMHO the Section should be "sound" instead of "x11".
"sound" doesn't seem to fit right, because xnoise is a media player
and also d
Hi Fabrizio,
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 11:35 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > > > Or is it because the package is no longer maintained upstream? Last
> > > > commit
> > > > is from 2009.
> > >
> > > The second one. This package is a little bit 'outdated'
> >
> > That's why I'm asking. Are you sur
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> >
> >> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> >
> > Not really:
> >
> > I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> > W: libgeier sour
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Not really:
>
> I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-m
Hi Kilian,
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:50 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
> Then go ahead and ask upstream about this. They know what use they can
> accept.
Ok. Later will send an email to author asking for information.
> > >
> > > The manpage is .. uhm, extremely brief. Sure that's all you want t
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> Could you please briefly explain why you are NMUing this package? Are you
> intending to take over package maintainership? What about the previous
> maintainer?
No, I don't want to take over the package. The maintainer is still
maintaining libgeier and taxbird.
But
Ciao Fabrizio,
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:25 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:00 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
> > Reviewing your package I find a bit of chat on the ITP bug yet no notion if
> > that "problem" of using Ubuntu logo has yet been solved and how.
>
> Unfortun
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:33:29 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:40:46 +0200, Jeroen Schot wrote:
> > Here is the ‘lintian’ commandline I ran, and its output:
>
> Thank you for providing this information!
>
> > $ lintian -IE --pedantic
> > I: nullidentd source: quilt-patch-missi
Le lundi 11 juillet 2011 06:52:58, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Gary Briggs writes:
[SNIP]
>
> > 1) Obviously not appropriate in the general case, but I could do a
> > major new release, since I've added a couple of big features since the
> > last deiban package.
>
> A new release of the same upstream
Hi Kilian,
thank you for your review.
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:00 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Reviewing your package I find a bit of chat on the ITP bug yet no notion if
> that "problem" of using Ubuntu logo has yet been solved and how.
Unfortunately, no.
I need to understand:
- if the logo
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:52:08PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-0.1
> > of the package "taxbird".
> >
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > taxbird- The first free Elster client (German Tax Declarations)
> >
> [...]
>
> Could you
Hi,
[...]
>
> I think the package is finished now.
>
Cool, thanks, package looks pretty good. I've just uploaded it, but please
consider the following comments for the next version you might prepare:
- I've remove one line from changelog (priority to extra), added the Homepage to
debian/cont
30 matches
Mail list logo
