Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package acsccid. This release is to correct
the udev rules filename (debian/libacsccid1.udev) to fix the problem that the
udev rules file was not added to the package. The udev rules file is required
by the latest pcscd. The smart card readers
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libsmack.
* Package name: libsmack
Version : 1.1.git20110809-1
Upstream Author : Brian McGillion brian.mcgill...@intel.com
* URL : http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-platform-security
* License :
Hi,
it is been a while since our last review of the OpenCPN
packaging, and the stable release we were working towards
has now shipped. Our .deb packaging efforts await further
instructions.
source tarball:
http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/tarballs/opencpn_2.5.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
debian/
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
it is been a while since our last review of the OpenCPN
packaging, and the stable release we were working towards
has now shipped. Our .deb packaging efforts await further
instructions.
source tarball:
Le mardi 16 août 2011 13:31:34, Hamish a écrit :
Hi,
it is been a while since our last review of the OpenCPN
packaging, and the stable release we were working towards
has now shipped. Our .deb packaging efforts await further
instructions.
source tarball:
Excerpts from Stanislav Maslovski's message of Sat Aug 13 06:12:53 -0400 2011:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
I guess, the HTTP-based method does not have this absurd 30 minutes
long delay... Trying to login and sort things out...
Noticed one more
I am packaging a software which uses autoconf and automake. I will
regenerate all autotool files with dh-autoreconf.
* The upstream tarball contains auto-generated files. Do I have to
save these files somewhere before calling dh_autoreconf and restore
them in the clean target, or is it
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:50:42AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
As of Thu Aug 11 08:47:29 UTC 2011, mentors.debian.net now runs the
Debexpo code.
FTP upload should be working. There is a cron job that looks for
FTP-based uploads every 30
Oohara Yuuma ooh...@libra.interq.or.jp writes:
I am packaging a software which uses autoconf and automake. I will
regenerate all autotool files with dh-autoreconf.
* The upstream tarball contains auto-generated files. Do I have to
save these files somewhere before calling dh_autoreconf
* Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu, 2011-08-16, 16:16:
I am packaging a software which uses autoconf and automake. I will
regenerate all autotool files with dh-autoreconf.
* The upstream tarball contains auto-generated files. Do I have to
save these files somewhere before calling dh_autoreconf
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu, 2011-08-16, 16:16:
I am packaging a software which uses autoconf and automake. I will
regenerate all autotool files with dh-autoreconf.
* The upstream tarball contains auto-generated files. Do I have to
save these files
I would be glad about some feedback about this (first) package for SMACK
support. And I would be very glad if someone upload this package for me.
Unfortunately I cannot answer the next three weeks. But I will wait for
more feedback for better packaging of libsmack (and other smack packages
in
Oohara Yuuma ooh...@libra.interq.or.jp writes:
* The software doesn't use AC_CANONICAL or libtool. Running autoreconf
manually doesn't generate config.{guess, sub}. Do I have to
build-depend on autotools-dev and call both dh_autoreconf and
dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig to copy the
Le Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:12:12PM -0500, Paul Elliott a écrit :
Are debian source packages required to follow
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
A. Registered Categories, of freedesktop's Desktop Menu Specification?
Dear Paul,
yes, when we use a Desktop menu file,
When I was building a library and I wanted to not install the .la file that
make install was creating, I could just leave it out of all of the
package.install files and it would not be installed.
In a single binary package how do I not install a file that make install
creates?
Thank You.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Paul Elliott
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
When I was building a library and I wanted to not install the .la file that
make install was creating, I could just leave it out of all of the
package.install files and it would not be installed.
In a single
16 matches
Mail list logo