Hello,
I see that this package is in NEW.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Does this mean that this RFS can be closed now ? Or is this RFS meant to
replace the package in NEW ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:00 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678914,
regarding RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:14:02 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #679201,
regarding RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 679336 by 679342
Bug #679336 [wnpp] ITP: qemplayer -- File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer
679336 was not blocked by any bugs.
679336 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 679336: 679342
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 663431 RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager
Bug #663431 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly
task manager
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.16-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager'
from 'R
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 668266 by 679344
Bug #668266 [wnpp] ITA: bzr-email -- Notification email plugin for Bazaar
668266 was not blocked by any bugs.
668266 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 668266: 679344
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
Werner Detter writes:
> So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and
> create a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze
> ?
I don't think so. I take that notice as something to be done as part of
the next release of the package; it's not worth makin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bzr-email"
* Package name: bzr-email
Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd
* URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email
* License : GPL-2+
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qemplayer"
* Package name : qemplayer
Version : 12.5-1.1
Upstream Author : William Brana
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qemplayer/
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glipper"
* Package name: glipper
Version : 2.3-3
Upstream Author : Laszlo Pandy
* URL : https://launchad.net/glipper
* License : GNU GPL v2
Sect
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:27:03 +0300
with message-id <1340836023.17806.13.ca...@freedom.lan>
and subject line RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help
has caused the Debian Bug report #677622,
regarding RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help
to be marked as done.
This mea
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:18:14 Schrober wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".
> >
> > It builds th
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:16:03 +0300
with message-id <826061340831...@web13e.yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: exactimage: file format misdetection
has caused the Debian Bug report #679321,
regarding RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
to be marked as done.
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".
>
> It builds those binary packages:
> edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (i
Hi,
>> So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and create
>> a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze ?
>
> If you would upload a new package with only that number changed, then it is,
> in
> my opinion, not worth the trouble.
The only thing that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
exa
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:59:35PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except
> (from packages.qa.debian.org):
>
> The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
> (Standards-Version 3.9.3
Hi everybody,
my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except
(from packages.qa.debian.org):
The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
(Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.2).
So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 560244 by 679107
Bug #560244 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster
support
Bug #585877 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster
support
560244 was not blocked by any bugs.
560244 was not blo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 672701 RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from
'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]'
> st
Hello,
On Sun, 13 May 2012 01:16:40 +0200
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Source: clearwaita-theme
> Description: Clearwaita theme
> Clearwaita is a GTK2/GTK3 theme. Files for GTK3 are a modified
> version of Adwaita, the default GNOME 3 theme, to make it visually
> close to Clearlooks. Files for GTK2
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Vaidya wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "the-powder-toy"
> * Package name: the-powder-toy
> Version : 78.1-1
> Upstream Author : HardWIRED and respective owners
> * URL : http://powdertoy.co.uk/
>
>
> * License : GPL-3
>
Hello Gregor.
> Uploaded now (to DELAYED/2); closing an RC bug and having a recent
> powertop in Debian seem like two good reasons :)
Thank you very much.
With best regards,
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió:
> I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see
> uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the "+20120619git27g55c0f4e" part
> before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're
> not going to package snapshot v
Hi,
Package updated and re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net to reflect the comment by
Bart Martens:
"The information of version 0.2.6-1.1 is missing in debian/changelog."
Please, consider sponsoring.
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > I took a look at your package:
> First of all, thanks for your quick answer :-)
You're welcome :)
> > - Since you're packaging a snapshot version, you should adjust your
> > watch file accordingly:
> >
> > Pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 672701 clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP]'
> thanks
Stopping proc
Hi,
> The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
> download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
> between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
> construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
> the
Hi Bart,
Yes, it's bug 560244 "ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with
cluster support"
Regard,
Steven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/C
29 matches
Mail list logo
