Hi Gabriele,
You wrote:
Please upload haxe and neko for me before the freeze.
If I won't find any sponsor, I'll re-orphan them.
Are you going to re-orphan them ? If yes, then please also remove the packages
from mentors and close the RFS bugs. If no, then please update neko at mentors
to
Hi Nikolai,
Can you fix bugs 643252 and 668725 for wheezy before introducing a newer
upstream release in unstable ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hey,
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 08:02 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Can you fix bugs 643252 and 668725 for wheezy before introducing a newer
upstream release in unstable ?
Both of those issues were fixed months ago in the 2.0.11 release
currently in the mentors repo, I filed an RFS but nobody came
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 06:34:12PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 08:02 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Can you fix bugs 643252 and 668725 for wheezy before introducing a newer
upstream release in unstable ?
Both of those issues were fixed months ago in the 2.0.11 release
Hello debian-mentors,
I have the following questions about sponsorship. I would like to welcome
answers from sponsors and from people maintaining packages via sponsorship.
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
Is it OK that a sponsor adds him/herself to Uploaders
Am 11.07.2012 13:34, schrieb Bart Martens:
Hello debian-mentors,
I have the following questions about sponsorship. I would like to welcome
answers from sponsors and from people maintaining packages via sponsorship.
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
Hello,
Looking at this package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email
Version:0.0.1~bzr58-1
Uploaded: 2012-06-28 00:14
How was bzr-email_0.0.1~bzr58.orig.tar.gz created ?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
Regards,
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
I see it regularly that sponsors do little modifications of packages
before uploading them. They may fix spelling errors, fix formatting, do
cosmetic fixes and so on before uploading
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
Under certain conditions, it can be ok. An OK from the sponsoree is one
such condition.
Is it OK that a sponsor adds him/herself to Uploaders ?
Again, with the sponsoree's agreement, and
Hi,
On 2012-07-11 11:34, Bart Martens wrote:
I have the following questions about sponsorship. I would like to welcome
answers from sponsors and from people maintaining packages via sponsorship.
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
Is it OK that a sponsor
hi,
Thanks for your time,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
Looking at this package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email
Version:0.0.1~bzr58-1
Uploaded: 2012-06-28 00:14
How was bzr-email_0.0.1~bzr58.orig.tar.gz created ?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:13:17AM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
hi,
Thanks for your time,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
Looking at this package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email
Version:0.0.1~bzr58-1
Uploaded:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 681199 by 681230
Bug #681199 [wnpp] ITP: gtkdataboxmm -- a C++ interface on top of the
gtkdatabox C library
681199 was not blocked by any bugs.
681199 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 681199: 681230
stop
Stopping
hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
I meant to suggest this part of developers-reference :
Detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on
how
this can be reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright.
OK (I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
I see it regularly that sponsors do little modifications of packages
before uploading them. They may fix
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
I see it regularly that sponsors do little modifications of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 677239 RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1 [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced
fractal generator
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fractalnow/0.8.0-1 [ITP #673395] --
Fast, advanced fractal generator
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 664246 RFS: gm-assistant/1.1.7-1 [ITP]
Bug #664246 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gm-assistant/1.1.6-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gm-assistant/1.1.7-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
gm-assistant/1.1.6-1 [ITP]'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes:
Personally, I feel that when adding a new package to the archive it can
actually be very useful to make the contributor jump through all the
hoops so they understand the level of responsibly involved with becoming
a package maintainer. If
Hi Marc,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
20 matches
Mail list logo
