Hi,
On 20.07.2012 01:47, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Curious to hear the thoughts of the current mentors.debian.net
> maintainers, especially on the reasoning behind the deletion, so I can
> better understand and see if I can come up with an alternative I like more.
well, packages consume space and r
On 20/07/2012 00:37, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Giulio Paci , 2012-07-19, 21:01:
>> 2) when you need to patch one of those files (it was required in a
>> previous version of the package).
>
> dpkg-source is supposed to set the same mtime on all patched files, so
> this shouldn't be a problem.
The fact
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi supp...@mentors.debian.net,
I understand that packages must be removed from mentors, because disk
space is not infinite. I have heard from multiple people requesting
sponsorship that one of the reasons to remove packages is that no
sponsor was fou
Dear mentors,
Can someone please upload the new version of libnet to unstable?
It is usually uploaded by Nelson A. de Oliveira but he's experiencing some
technical difficulties so I'm asking here instead.
In short the changes are:
* Packaging of new upstream release (1.1.6)
* Compile with -Werr
* Giulio Paci , 2012-07-19, 21:01:
It happens 1) when you retrieve files from VCS systems or
Fair enough. (Although I'd rather touch the generated files in
debian/rules than patch upstream makefile.)
2) when you need to patch one of those files (it was required in a
previous version of the
Hi,
I contributed updated (and new)manpage translations for a
package which had not been updated for ages. Therefore I
would like to provide the German users of (old)stable with
recent translations.
Last time I made my private backport I had to compile code
extracted from the sources (not part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thursday 19 July 20:03:07 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: fractalnow
> tags 677239 + pending
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-bilevel
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-request
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-bilevel
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-view
> http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS#Usertags
On 19/07/2012 13:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Giulio Paci , 2012-07-19, 04:09:
>>> The examples directory could act as a test suite. Please run it at
>>> build time.
>> Done.
>
> Please honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck.
Fixed.
> That's better. You probably want to add a new line (escaped with a dot
On 19/07/2012 18:53, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:09:25AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
>> On 16/07/2012 17:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
-PREFIX = /usr/local
+PREFIX = /usr
>>>
>>> Could be overridden in debian/rules.
>>
>> As far as I know I should either move the bina
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> retitle 619933 RFP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc,
> gobjc, g++)
> retitle 656044 RFP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc,
> gobjc, g++)
> noowner 619933
> stop
>
>
> Hello Samuel,
>
> The packa
Игорь Пашев wrote on 2012-07-19 17:48:
> You can replace your entries with these, and command
> apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade
Before you do a complete "dist-upgrade" I recommend to upgrade
some essential packages:
apt-get install debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring
apt-get install
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:09:25AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> On 16/07/2012 17:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> -PREFIX = /usr/local
> >> +PREFIX = /usr
> >
> > Could be overridden in debian/rules.
>
> As far as I know I should either move the binaries by hand or patch the
> Makefile so that ?= is use
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:43:23PM +0200, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
>
> >Package: wnpp
> >Followup-For: Bug #662736
> >Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
> >
> >Package: wnpp
> >Followup-For: Bug #662736
> >Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
> >
> >Package: wnpp
> >Followup-For: Bug #662736
> >Owner: "Pedro I.
Dear Mentors:
On 18/07/12 11:22, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 18/07/12 10:40, Jerome Benoit a écrit :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scscp-imcce"
[...]
SCSCP stands for Symbolic Computation Software Composibility Protoco
Thanks for reply!
No problem, i have commented that line having string "unstable"
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Toresson <
alexander.tores...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Igor,
>
> This looks like it'll upgrade him to unstable, which he may not want to do.
>
> // Alexander
>
> (resent b
Hello Igor,
This looks like it'll upgrade him to unstable, which he may not want to do.
// Alexander
(resent because I forgot to reply to the list too)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Here is my sources.list:
>
> deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 19/07/12 15:15, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usercategory
> wheezy-status * Wheezy Status [tag=] + Intended for Wheezy
> [for-wheezy] + Not Intended for Wheezy [not-for-wheezy] + Fit for
> Wheezy [fit-f
hi,friends.
i am using sqeeze now and i want to move to wheezy.I have googled it and
find so many answers,but i have installed some non free softwares in my
SQUEEZE . I think that it may give problems at time of upgrade.I am pasting
sources.list
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
> severity 676408 wishlist
Bug #676408 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fusio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 675532 wishlist
Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.3.3 (ITP #675467)
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675532: http://bugs.debian.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
> severity 671492 wishlist
Bug #671492 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sstp-
* Giulio Paci , 2012-07-19, 04:09:
The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc
I updated it.
In addition to your recommendations I also changed section from "misc"
to "devel".
Very well.
The examples directory could act as a test su
Hi Bart!
On 19/07/2012 07:23, Bart Martens wrote:
> I see that you updated the package at mentors around 24 June 2012, but the
> package is no longer there. What happened ?
It happened that I contacted Jakub Wilk that is wishing to review and to
sponsor both openfst and phonetisaurus. I publish
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Let's try again, now that #681853 is fixed:
> owner 666243 !
Bug #666243 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
parser generators for C
Owner recorded as Jakub Wilk .
> owner 663916 !
Bug #663916 [sponsorship-request
26 matches
Mail list logo
