On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:25:58PM +0100, Steven Ayre wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mysql-cluster-7.2"
>
> Package name: mysql-cluster-7.2
> Version : 7.2.6+dfsg-1
Would You like update it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683336 RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processi
Hi Michael,
About your package "freefoam" at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-01 08:37.
If nobody increases the bug severities to at least "important" then I suggest
that you reduce the changes to what is likely acceptable for an unblock.
Anyhow, my first impression is that you are doing good wor
I've now uploaded the 120715 upstream release to mentors.
--
Gary Kramlich
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Gary,
Mathieu,
I've uploaded a new version of the package to mentors with most of your
suggestions. I'm going to work on pulling in the most recent release now
as we figure the few things left out.
> Thanks for packaging ninja. H
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "mlpack"
* Package name: mlpack
Version : 1.0.1-4
Upstream Author : Ryan Curtin
* URL : http://www.mlpack.org/
* License : LGPL-3+
Sect
this stupid DM process only make debian packagin more slower to evolution,
i have a problem uploading a debian mentors sig file and nobody respond and
solves my problem
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:22 AM, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Hi all;
>
> Here are the minutes from the (apparently) annual "mento
On 08/01/2012 07:00 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>> Some of the bugs are fixed in the upload at m.d.n are not RC, but still
>> pretty annoying. To get a freeze-exception, would I need to remove those
>> changes?
>
> What are the bug severi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683500 serious
Bug #683500 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> retitle 683500 RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 [RC]
Bug #683500 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1
Changed Bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 682893 by 683500
Bug #682893 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: freefoam/0.1.2-1 (for experimental)
682893 was not blocked by any bugs.
682893 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 682893: 683500
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Le 01/08/2012 18:48, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> >> Hello mentors,
> >> I am working on one bug of mine
> >> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) a
Le 01/08/2012 18:48, Bart Martens a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
>> Hello mentors,
>> I am working on one bug of mine
>> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) and I've
>> noticed that, technically, my new package will have no upstream
Hi all
This upload is to fix an RC bug.
Some time ago it was filed a 'serious' bug against the package kstars-data-
extra-tycho2 that I maintain. The seriousness of the bug was related to the
possibility of copyright infringement. Bug number is #681654.
I've cleared the doubt with a change to t
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> Some of the bugs are fixed in the upload at m.d.n are not RC, but still
> pretty annoying. To get a freeze-exception, would I need to remove those
> changes?
What are the bug severities of these "pretty annoying" bugs ?
> Also, would
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 04:20 AM, Dave Vehrs wrote:
> >Package: sponsorship-requests
> >Severity: normal
> >
> >Dear mentors,
> >
> >I am looking for a sponsor for updates to my package "podget". It's been
> >a few years and updates
> >since the
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Hello mentors,
> I am working on one bug of mine
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) and I've
> noticed that, technically, my new package will have no upstream.
When I read bug 664457 then this package would
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 675005 by 668148
Bug #675005 [xshisen] src:xshisen: maintainer address bounces
675005 was not blocked by any bugs.
675005 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 675005: 668148
> severity 668148 important
Bug #668148 [sponsorship
block 675005 by 668148
severity 668148 important
retitle 668148 RFS: xshisen/1:1.51-4 [RC]
thanks
Setting severity to important, because the update fixes RC bug #675005.
Best regards,
Tobias Hansen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freefoam"
* Package name: freefoam
Version : 0.1.0+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Michael Wild
* URL : http://freefoam.sour
On 08/01/2012 04:20 AM, Dave Vehrs wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for updates to my package "podget". It's been
a few years and updates
since the version in the Debian repositories has been updated. (Ver.
0.5.8 is in the repositori
Hello mentors,
I am working on one bug of mine
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) and I've
noticed that, technically, my new package will have no upstream. What is
the packaging workflow in this case? All tutorials/manuals I've read
assume that you work with upstream tarball
21 matches
Mail list logo
