Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Prach Pongpanich
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my RC bug fix of php-soap (#701134) * Package name: php-soap Version : 0.12.0-2.1 Upstream Author : Jan Schneider j...@horde.org * URL :

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/12/2013 02:08 PM, Prach Pongpanich wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-soap/php-soap_0.12.0-2.1.dsc Hi Prach, Thanks a lot for taking care of it. I don't agree with removing the php-pear dependency. php-soap even ships a /usr/share/php/.registry More over,

PINJAMAN TANPA AGUNAN dr BII RATE 0.98% PAYROL

2013-03-12 Thread sandi9990
Pinjaman tanpa agunan /kredit tanpa agunan dari Bank terkemuka BII Menawarkan kepada anda untuk mendapatkan nya dengan bunga yg kompetitif hingga 0.98 % khusus payrol BII NO CREDIT CARD NO SUCCESS FEE 1.FC KTP 2.FC NOMOR REK TABUNGAN 3.FC NPWP (JIKA PINJAMAN DIATAS 50 JT ) 4.SLIP GAJI ASLI

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/12/2013 02:08 PM, Prach Pongpanich wrote: +- Drop Pre-Depends: php-pear as it's not needed I'm sorry, I missread. Indeed, the pre-depends: (and not depends:, as I wrote earlier) might not be needed. Could you explain a bit more why it appears in your changelog as if it was part of the

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Prach Pongpanich
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 03/12/2013 02:08 PM, Prach Pongpanich wrote: +- Drop Pre-Depends: php-pear as it's not needed I'm sorry, I missread. Indeed, the pre-depends: (and not depends:, as I wrote earlier) might not be needed. Could you

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
To the release team (and Prach): Dear release team, Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134. He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but can't remember what it was about. The bug

Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 23:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134. He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but can't remember what it was about. The bug report says:

Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Werner Detter
Package: sponsorship-requests Usertags: unblock Dear Maintainer, I've just created a new policyd-weight packages (0.1.15.2-5) which has just been uploaded to mentors.debian.net. It includes a new quilt-patch which removes the DNSBL dnsbl.njabl.org from policyd-weight due to service shutdown

Bug#700296: RFS: libapache2-mod-geoip/1.2.8-1 [ITA] -- GeoIP support for apache2

2013-03-12 Thread Arno Töll
Hi Prach, On 11.03.2013 09:07, Prach Pongpanich wrote: * Please consider upgrading to new style (dh = 7) rules style. It makes life easier to you and is more forward oriented. That said, your rules file looks ok but you could ease life to all of us, including you. * While you're at it, remove

Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Arno Töll
On 12.03.2013 21:19, Werner Detter wrote: * Add 08_del_dnsbl.njabl.org.patch which removes dnsbl.njabl.org list due to servuce shutdown on 2013-03-01 * Bumped standard versions to 3.9.4 The RT does not feel very comfortable to push standards at this stage. But given there are no real

Re: Runtime directories: in package or by scripts?

2013-03-12 Thread Arno Töll
On 10.03.2013 13:53, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:47:42PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote: What is the best way to ship such a diretory: in package (d/foo.dirs) or create in postinst script? Why postinst? Because on removal there will be a message cannot remove directory,

Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Werner Detter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Arno, thanks for your reply. The RT does not feel very comfortable to push standards at this stage. But given there are no real changes, they may generously ignore that while reviewing your debdiff. Yes, there are no real changes - I hope

Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Werner Detter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've also created a new package for stable, filled a bugreport against the sponsorship-requests pseudo package. http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight The respective dsc file for the stable package can be found at:

Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Arno Töll
On 13.03.2013 00:46, Werner Detter wrote: The respective dsc file for the stable package can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2+squeeze2.dsc Please file a pu bug against the release.debian.org pseudo-package along with a debdiff.

Re: Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5

2013-03-12 Thread Werner Detter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 13.03.13 00:56, schrieb Arno Töll: On 13.03.2013 00:46, Werner Detter wrote: The respective dsc file for the stable package can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2+squeeze2.dsc

Bug#702909: marked as done (RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:38:14 +0100 with message-id 513fca76.8020...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#702909: RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #702909, regarding RFS: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#687566: marked as done (RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-5 [ITP] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 04:20:34 + with message-id e1ufdb4-0004wp...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-5 [ITP] -- Transcribe speech data using an integrated editor has caused the Debian Bug report #687566, regarding RFS: transcriber/1.5.1.1-5

Bug#691270: marked as done (RFS: szg/1.0-1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 04:20:32 + with message-id e1ufdb2-0004uw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: szg/1.0-1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter has caused the Debian Bug report #691270, regarding RFS: szg/1.0-1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter to be marked as done. This means

Bug#691907: marked as done (RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA])

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 04:20:32 + with message-id e1ufdb2-0004up...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #691907, regarding RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem