On Monday 23 September 2013 20:17:23 Beco wrote:
> > [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
> > [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/
> > [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/index.en.html
>
> Good! I'll start with that. But without a mentor it will be hard
On 2013-09-23 at 20:17:23 -0300, Beco wrote:
> Good! I'll start with that. But without a mentor it will be hard to
> know if I'm doing the right things, and I don't want to pollute the
> list with too basic questions. Anyway, thanks. I'll manage somehow.
You may also consider joining #debian-mento
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:45:47 +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> I have read about Debian Women's mentorship program, but I believe
> it currently is suspended for lack of volunteers.
Current status:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2013/09/msg1.html
Cf. also the last IRC meeting:
ht
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:02:36 +0200
with message-id <5241633c.3040...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line Upload of mapserver/6.4.0-2 was sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #723991,
regarding RFS: mapserver/6.4.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
The package that I want to pick up has a status:
"The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
I never knew the details of Debian Policy before, but did try to read the
policy from 3.8.4 to 3.9.4, and find it a rat
On 2013-09-24 14:38, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> The package that I want to pick up has a status:
>
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
>
> I never knew the details of Debian Policy before, but did try
Hi,
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
This is at first nothing more than the Standards-Version field in
debian/control.
> I never knew the details of Debian Policy before […]
Sorry to disapoint you, but
On 2013-09-24 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>> If I can fix all lintian reported issues, it'll be safe to say that I've
>> > bring the package to the last version of Debian Policy, right?
> No. It is safe to say that if, and only if, you bump the
> Standards-Version field to 3.9.4 and *then* have
> Lintian does not "down-scale" its checks based on the S-V field; so you
> will get (almost) the same result regardless of what value you put in
> the field. The obvious exception is checks that actually cares about
> the content of the S-V field (which is something like 5 tags or so).
Yes, and
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Dominik George wrote:
> Sorry to disapoint you, but you should read *all of* DPM before passing
> a package for upload to a sponsor or to mentors.
I don't think we have never expected that new maintainers read policy
before creating a package. The Debian member wh
Le 24/09/2013 15:58, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Dominik George wrote:
>
>> Sorry to disapoint you, but you should read *all of* DPM before passing
>> a package for upload to a sponsor or to mentors.
>
> I don't think we have never expected that new maintainers read pol
Hello,
On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>> lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
Properly reads as -Evil :)
--
WBR, Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Andrew Shadura schrieb:
>Hello,
>
>On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>
>>> lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
>> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
>
>Properly reads as -Evil :)
Hi,
please fix your font and/or try not to be funny when you might confuse newbies.
-n
On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Shadura schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>>
lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
>>> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
>>
>> Properly reads as -Evil :)
>
> Hi,
>
> please fix your
Niels Thykier schrieb:
>On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote:
>>
>>
>> Andrew Shadura schrieb:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George
>wrote:
>>>
> lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
>>>
>>> Properly reads as
On 24/09/13 at 16:15 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le 24/09/2013 15:58, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Dominik George wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry to disapoint you, but you should read *all of* DPM before passing
> >> a package for upload to a sponsor or to mentors.
> >
> > I
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-product-attribute/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706942,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-product-attribute/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-stock-split/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706944,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-stock-split/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-account-asset/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706949,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-account-asset/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-project-invoice/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706946,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-project-invoice/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:43 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-stock-supply-production/2.8.0-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706950,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-stock-supply-production/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-carrier-percentage/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706952,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-carrier-percentage/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-product-measurements/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706955,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-product-measurements/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:43 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-sale-shipment-cost/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706951,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-sale-shipment-cost/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-account-fr/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706969,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-account-fr/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Thought I would forward this here as it's a multimedia package and I
haven't had a response to my RFS.
On 11 September 2013 17:21, Kaspar Emanuel wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi mentors,
>
> I have built a package "mod-host" and am looking for sponsorship.
>
> *
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-purchase-shipment-cost/2.8.0-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706954,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-purchase-shipment-cost/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-carrier/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706959,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-carrier/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-stock-supply-forecast/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706941,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-stock-supply-forecast/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-sale-supply-drop-shipment/2.8.0-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706956,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-sale-supply-drop-shipment/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-account-stock-anglo-saxon/2.8.0-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706953,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-account-stock-anglo-saxon/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:43 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-account-stock-continental/2.8.0-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706943,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-account-stock-continental/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:44 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-production/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706948,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-production/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:23:45 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tryton-modules-carrier-weight/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #706958,
regarding RFS: tryton-modules-carrier-weight/2.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hi all,
[Apparently not all e-mail ends up on d-mentors].
Graham is looking for a sponsor for his package "doublecmd":
* Package name: doublecmd
Version : 0.5.6
Upstream Author : Alexander Koblov
* URL : http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL, LGPL
Hi,
I am glad to see this software packaged! I have created already this
one, but still not managed that to be uploaded, though using it locally.
The package itself looks OK. I will have a closer look at it, and if
there are no critical notes, it will be uploaded.
Thanks,
Anton
On 09/24/2013 0
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "psocksxx"
* Package name: psocksxx
Version : 0.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Uditha Atukorala
* URL : https://github.com/uditha-atukorala/psocksxx
* License : LGPLv
T o n g writes:
> The package that I want to pick up has a status:
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
> I never knew the details of Debian Policy before, but did try to read
> the policy from 3.8.4 to 3.9
The other question might be if this new package is really required because both
seem to do the same thing...
Fernando, you're the upstream author, you might want to join forces with the
other author.
Eric
Tobias Frost wrote:
>Hallo Fernando,
>
>please do not open new bug when you upload a ne
39 matches
Mail list logo
