> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 09:43:18 +0800
> Subject: Re: key problem
> From: p...@debian.org
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
>> Oke, so I will make a new one and sign my packages with this.
>> Do
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Oke, so I will make a new one and sign my packages with this.
> Do I have to resign the packages I made on mentors.debian.org again
> or can I do this on the next revision of that package.
Re-signing would be a good idea if you expect sponsor
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the package "rotix"
* Package name: rotix
Version : 0.83-4.1
Section : text
It builds those binary packages:
rotix - A program to generate rotational obfuscation
Looks like I've forgotten to include an essential bit of information.
Sorry about that.
--
* Package name: cppreference-doc
* Version : 20140208+dfsg0-1
* Upstream Author : Cppreference contributors (content),
Povilas Kanapickas (pack
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xrdp":
* Package name: xrdp
Version : 0.6.1-2
Upstream Author : Jay Sorg
* URL : http://www.xrdp.org/
* License : GPL-2+, other, PD, MIT
Section :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppreference-doc":
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppreference-doc/cppreference-doc_20140208+dfsg0-1.dsc
It builds these binary packages:
cppreference-doc-en-html
Hi Joachim,
On 08-02-14 18:51, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>> - Your watch file doesn't work, please find attached a version that
>> works and at the same time takes advantage of the fact that upstream
>> signs its releases. You need the also attached keyring for that but feel
>> free to generate that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pgtop"
* Package name: pgtop
Version : 3.7.0-2
Upstream Author : Mark Wong
* URL : http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/
* License : BSD
Sec
Hello,
I try to port cjs (part of Cinnamon) to Debian.
On the control file these packages are made:
cjs - Mozilla-based javascript bindings for the GNOME platform
libcjs0c - This is the shared library applications link to
libcjs-dev - This package contains the development files applications n
Hello Paul,
at first thank you very much for uploading!
Paul Gevers wrote on 2014-02-08 18:08:
> - Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one
> question is now part of the answer to another question. I am unsure if
> this is intended.
I haven't checked this point. I will do
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 23:07:42 +0600
> From: w...@wrar.name
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: key problem
>
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:03:57PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>> When I reinstall Debian I forgot to make a backup of my gpg-k
On 06-02-14 22:04, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chrony"
From the Debian side this looks trivial and I think I will upload as is,
but some remarks still.
- Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one
question is now part of the answer to
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:03:57PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> When I reinstall Debian I forgot to make a backup of my gpg-key.
> I know what number it has and on which server it is.
Only public keys are stored on public servers, of course. If you lost the
access to your private key you cannot us
Hello,
When I reinstall Debian I forgot to make a backup of my gpg-key.
I know what number it has and on which server it is.
Is there a way I can retrieve it and use it again or must I make a new pair
and sign the packages I made again.
Roelof
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xpenguins":
* Package name: xpenguins
Version : 2.2-10
Upstream Author : Robin Hogan
* URL : http://xpenguins.seul.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> Also he plans to release a gtk3 version without gtkimageview
> dependency around April, so the problem will disappear.
Great news.
> My idea is to upload viewnior anyway. Around April I will just
> repackage for gtk3.
Fair enough.
>
Your message dated Sat, 8 Feb 2014 22:48:12 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#737751: RFS: read-edid/3.0.1-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #737751,
regarding RFS: read-edid/3.0.1-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Uploaded,
Thanks,
--
Liang Guo
http://guoliang.me/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAJwrgW6bRLiczth0=s6_nmkvs9ih48jx2jsy22u-7rxbw3b...@mail.gmail
Sorry for wrong version, ofc it is about 1.4 not 1.3 which is also in
mentors. Guy released today.
On 8 February 2014 15:34, Dariusz Dwornikowski <
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponso
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "viewnior"
* Package name: viewnior
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Siyan Panayotov
* URL : http://xsisqox.github.io/Viewnior/
* License : GPL-3
On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Many thanks for uploading this. However, the package has been stuck in
>> NEW for the last few weeks. I'm not sure what the problem is, but
>> possibly it's because the 0ins
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "klein"
* Package name: klein
Version : 0.2.3-2
Upstream Author : David Reid
* URL : https://github.com/twisted/klein
* License : MIT (Expat)
Section
Ok, I contacted viewnior Author. His response is :
"First off, gtkimageview was not active when I started working on
Viewnior, that is why I decided to embed it.
I contains a lot of bugs and obsolete code, so stripping viewnior and
using vanila gtkimageview is out of the question.
If there is an
> From: lisi.re...@gmail.com
> To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How to block kernel updates
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:32:30 +
>
> On Saturday 08 February 2014 09:40:43 Chris Bannister wrote:
>> AFAIUI, if the package has a different name,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:08:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I expect the GNOME community would at the very least be willing to let
> viewnior folks have commit access to the git repository at
> git.gnome.org. If that fails they could create a proper fork at a new
> location but I guess viewnior fo
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:10:13 +0800
> Subject: Re: FW: how to do this with dh7
> From: p...@debian.org
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
>> Yes, I have more knowlegde about dh7.
>
> Seems reas
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> This is not clear from the
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-donation.html
> -->8--
> Please remove this privacy problem and add a note to the debian/upstream file
> using the donation field.
> -->8--
> Please, fix lintian
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:20:38AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > * Remove donation link in index.html (fix lintian E:
> > privacy-breach-donation) in favor of debian/upstream
>
> This is *not* the right way to fix this issue. The form should remain,
> just remove the problematic part of it (th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equalx"
* Package name: equalx
Version : 0.6.0-1
Upstream Author : Mihai Niculescu
* URL : http://equalx.sourceforge.net/index.html
* License : GPL-3
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Yes, I have more knowlegde about dh7.
Seems reasonable.
> And according to the manual Im not allowed to use the debian directory
> provided upstream.
I don't think 'allowed' is the right word there. You definitely can
use it if you want.
I expect the GNOME community would at the very least be willing to let
viewnior folks have commit access to the git repository at
git.gnome.org. If that fails they could create a proper fork at a new
location but I guess viewnior folks aren't interested in that either
though?
Another option is to
>
>
> For gtkimageview I'm not familiar with the situation but I expect that
> is more like the typical embedded code copies situation; viewnior
> upstream probably didn't bother sending their few patches to
> gtkimageview upstream. The right thing to do in that case is to get
> the two upstreams t
On 06-02-14 22:04, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chrony"
If nobody beats me to it, I will have a look. Feel free to bug me if I
haven't responded within a week.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
33 matches
Mail list logo
