Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-09-27 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Fixed. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 23:33:28 Eriberto wrote: > 2014-09-27 21:31 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom : > > Hi Eriberto, > > Hi, > > > Regarding your list: > > 1. I don't understand whats wrong here. I checked another changelog just > > to be sure: > > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/c

Bug#763029: RFS: cligh-0.2 console Github manipulation tool

2014-09-27 Thread Eriberto
tags 763029 moreinfo thanks Hi Dmitry. About your package, please: 1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the 0.2-1 version only and describing it as 'initial release'. Put the ITP number. You can see an example here[1]. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#c

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-09-27 Thread Eriberto
2014-09-27 21:31 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom : > Hi Eriberto, Hi, > Regarding your list: > 1. I don't understand whats wrong here. I checked another changelog just to be > sure: > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/e3/unstable_changelog > My entries are all associated with the sam

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-09-27 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Hi Eriberto, Regarding your list: 1. I don't understand whats wrong here. I checked another changelog just to be sure: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/e3/unstable_changelog My entries are all associated with the same upstream version. I changed all "unstable" references to

Re: Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Bamm
> You can use debian/install.$arch to differentiate these two cases. See > the "DEBHELPER CONFIG FILES" section in the debhelper(7) manpage. > > Cheers, >Sven Thanks Sven, it worked! At first I created: debian/install.i386 debian/install.amd64 Unfortunately that didn't work. But when I

Bug#763101: marked as done (RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-2 [RC])

2014-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Sep 2014 01:00:47 +0200 with message-id <5427419f.1040...@xs4all.nl> and subject line RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-2 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #763101, regarding RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#763051: marked as done (RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p1 [RC])

2014-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Sep 2014 01:02:19 +0200 with message-id <542741fb.2020...@xs4all.nl> and subject line RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p1 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #763051, regarding RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#763117: RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-2+3p2p1

2014-09-27 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcitygml" Package name: libcitygml Version : 0.14+svn134-2+3p2p1 Upstream Author : Joachim Pouderoux URL : http://code.google.com/p/libcitygml License :

Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2

2014-09-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > > > * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > > It's still present. > > > My mistake. It should be 'Add' instead, I've fixed it. I think the consensus is not to override this tag just because the upstream

Bug#763101: RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-2 [RC]

2014-09-27 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmosis" Package name: osmosis Version : 0.43.1-2 Upstream Author : Brett Henderson URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis License : public-d

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-09-27 Thread Eriberto
Hi Shawn, You need do some adjustments in your package. Please: 1. d/changelog: rewrite this file, refering to the last version only. You can see an example here[1]. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog 2. d/control: - Your Vcs-* points to a empty repos

Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2

2014-09-27 Thread Elías Alejandro
Hi Andrey, On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:54:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > * debian/control > > + Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 > The current Policy version is 3.9.6. > You are right. No found changes, I've updated Standards version. > > * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-

Bug#752116: marked as done (RFS: drmips/1.2.3-1 [ITP])

2014-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:32:09 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #752116, regarding RFS: drmips/1.2.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

2014-09-27 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Bruno, Uploaded! Thanks for your work (as packager and as upstream). Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-27 8:27 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova : > Oops, you're right. I should list both there. > I just uploaded a new package to Mentors. The issue should be fixed. > > 2014-09-27 12:05 GMT+01:00 Eriberto : >> >>

Bug#762995: marked as done (RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2)

2014-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:26:26 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #762995, regarding RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#745135: marked as done (RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database)

2014-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:26:26 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database has caused the Debian Bug report #745135, regarding RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of wor

Re: Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2014-09-27 17:49 +0200, Bamm wrote: > I could not use the wildcards bin/*/* usr/bin because the tarball > contains binary blobs of the same filename. I want the correct file to > be installed depending on whether an i386 or amd64 package is being > built. You can use debian/install.$arch to di

Bug#762897: RFS: i3blocks/1.2-2 [ITP] - statusline for the i3 window manager

2014-09-27 Thread Jason Pleau
Hello again! I have updated my i3blocks package to version 1.2-2 : * Package name: i3blocks Version : 1.2-2 Upstream Author : Vivien Didelot * URL : https://github.com/vivien/i3blocks * License : GPL-3 Section : x11 It builds the following bi

Re: Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Bamm
Thanks Charles and Paul for the answers. I could not use the wildcards bin/*/* usr/bin because the tarball contains binary blobs of the same filename. I want the correct file to be installed depending on whether an i386 or amd64 package is being built. I am checking out the dh-exec solution you s

Bug#745135: RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database)

2014-09-27 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hello! 2014-09-27 14:04 GMT+03:00 Tobias Frost : > Hi Otto, > > (I wrote most of this before your response at 9:26) > I tested commit rights: No I do not have them. (Feel free to add me, if > you like; but then you need to answer this: Is it okay for you to also Sorry, I remembered incorrectly. Y

Bug#763051: RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p1 [RC]

2014-09-27 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcitygml" Package name: libcitygml Version : 0.14+svn134-1+3p2p1 Upstream Author : Joachim Pouderoux URL : http://code.google.com/p/libcitygml License

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

2014-09-27 Thread Bruno Nova
Oops, you're right. I should list both there. I just uploaded a new package to Mentors. The issue should be fixed. 2014-09-27 12:05 GMT+01:00 Eriberto : > Hi Bruno, > > We have a little issue yet. I d/copyright: > > Files: src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java >

Re: Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 06:55:03PM +0800, Bamm a écrit : > > Is it possible for the debian/install file to install a file based on > architecture? Perhaps something like this? > > bin/$arch/* usr/bin > > Where $arch is either i386 or amd64? Hello Bamm, you can have a look at dh-exec and how it

Re: Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Bamm wrote: > Is it possible for the debian/install file to install a file based on > architecture? Perhaps something like this? The best thing to do is fix the upstream build system so it installs the right files in the right place but if that isn't possible

Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]

2014-09-27 Thread Eriberto
Hi Bruno, We have a little issue yet. I d/copyright: Files: src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTabbedPaneUI.java src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTitlePane.java Copyright: 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Licens

Install files based on architecture?

2014-09-27 Thread Bamm
Hi, Is it possible for the debian/install file to install a file based on architecture? Perhaps something like this? bin/$arch/* usr/bin Where $arch is either i386 or amd64? Or is there a better way to do this? Thanks for any answers. Bamm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...

Re: install files for python packages

2014-09-27 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 26/09/14 23:05, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Richard Ulrich wrote: Do install files work differently for packages that involve python_distutils? When I package C++ stuff, I used install or packagename.install files to suppress certain files, to add certain files

Bug#762995: RFS: radiotray/0.7.3-2

2014-09-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 04:23:19PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > * Package name: radiotray >Version : 0.7.3-2 >Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro > * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL-3 >Section : sound > > It builds

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-09-27 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Hi Eriberto, Sorry, one more fix. I patched the "About" dialogue so that the license displayed matches that of the COPYING file in the source tree. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 22, 2014 17:20:56 Eriberto wrote: > 2014-09-22 4:21 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom : > > Hi Eriberto > > Hi! > > > I w

Bug#745135: Top 10 reasons you should sponsor MariaDB 10.0 into Debian this weekend (Re: Bug#745135: RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database)

2014-09-27 Thread Tobias Frost
Sorry, forgot to CC the BTS. On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 23:14 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello Tobias and thanks for the review! > > 2014-09-23 22:49 GMT+03:00 Tobias Frost : > > Hi Otto, > > - d/control: I'd add to mariadb-test as short description what is the > > test package about.. To avoid