Le Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Ole Streicher a écrit :
>
> I am a bit confused on how I can register more than one document for one
> package.
Hi Ole,
one file per document; see the emboss package for instance.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:30:25PM +0200, Joël Krähemann wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/ags
Even mentors shows a lot of lintian-detected problems.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi all
Related to:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ags
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/gsequencer.git
What I'm basically doing to upload to debian, please give any advice to
improve.
joel@debain:~/gsequencer.github$ make distcheck
joel@debain:~/gsequencer.github$ cp ags-0.4.2-
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:22:31AM +0300, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:52:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for pointing out, fixed and uploaded to mentors.
>
> See https://mentors.debian.net/package/blktool
>
> Changes since he last upload:
>
> * Drop "QA u
* Vincent Hobeïka , 2015-06-19, 16:20:
I am facing some troubles regarding boost wave and my package vera++.
It has been decided upstream to recompile boost wave with vera++ in
order to activate the BOOST_WAVE_SUPPORT_MS_EXTENSIONS cxx flag so
vera++ would be able to parse specific windows ide
Hi,
I am a bit confused on how I can register more than one document for one
package. If I just append the whole content of the second document,
lintian complains that "Document:" should be the first line. Also the
documentation of the doc-base mentiones that there should be exactly one
main secti
Dear mentors,
I am facing some troubles regarding boost wave and my package vera++.
It has been decided upstream to recompile boost wave with vera++ in
order to activate the BOOST_WAVE_SUPPORT_MS_EXTENSIONS cxx flag so
vera++ would be able to parse specific windows identifiers (__stdcall,
__decls
Hi Again:
On 19/06/15 14:52, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi:
>
> On 19/06/15 08:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2015-06-19 02:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>>>
>>> On 18/06/15 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hi:
On 19/06/15 08:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-06-19 02:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> thanks for your prompt reply.
>>
>> On 18/06/15 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>>
what am I supposed to do for unblocking ?
>>>
>>> You s
The state of the package is: I'm not sure if it's o.k. for it to get accepted
into the archive when a DFSG compliant change of the license is declared for
the project but the actual file headers state something different.
For that I've added a patch which disables the style check over by default f
10 matches
Mail list logo
