On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or
both.
What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so
maybe
running pybuild --with python3, or providing two
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 09:54 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
1) I did a buildinstall of the package, and I can't make it work
brew install cmake
brew
brew --help
linuxbrew --help
returns nothing
Oops...Sorry for that...
By mistake I introduced this bug into the wrapper script.
What this [ITP,PAPT] ?
Thanks a lot
[]’s
Júnior Santos
ITIL® Foundation Certificate in IT Service Management
Registration number 4365854.1019776
E-mail: j.s.jun...@live.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:56:30 + (UTC)
with message-id 772988824.560657.1440521790257.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com
and subject line Re: Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary
formats [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #792447,
regarding RFS:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:23:51 -0300
J.S.Júnior j.s.jun...@live.com wrote:
What this [ITP,PAPT] ?
Thanks a lot
ITP - Intent To Package [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/ITP
PAPT - Python Apps Packaging Team
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam
/Andreas
Hi,
ITP is Intent To Package [1]
PAPT is Python Applications Packaging Team
[1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[2]
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=python-apps-team%40lists.alioth.debian.org
cheers,
G.
Hi
But, It`s tittle for sponsor request, is possible.
Subject: RFS: pacote [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] - Description.
or I’am not right.
only question for about this, for me doubt.
Thanks very much.
wnpp page explains it.
ITP: a new package you want to introduce in debian
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or both.
What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so maybe
running pybuild --with python3, or providing two packages might be good.
what do you think?
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Daniel
some issues I found:
1) please don't set architectures fields that way.
Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way)
leave any.
When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted
out),
a
❦ 25 août 2015 16:23 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com :
I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl),
which
is on ITA [1].
Hi Daniel!
I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about
this RFS? It's always easier for the
/buildlogs/afl_1.86b-1_amd64-20150825-1547.build
Mentors upload:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/afl/afl_1.86b-1.dsc
Due to problems with clang-3.5 on arm64 [2] I've disabled the build for this
arch
temporarily, as Jakub suggested to do. Gianfranco has found out that the package
builds
-1_amd64-20150825-1547.build
Mentors upload:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/afl/afl_1.86b-1.dsc
Due to problems with clang-3.5 on arm64 [2] I've disabled the build for this
arch
temporarily, as Jakub suggested to do. Gianfranco has found out that the package
builds again fine
❦ 25 août 2015 17:05 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com :
I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about
this RFS? It's always easier for the previous maintainer to check a new
upload.
I would also suggest to move the package to a more modern packaging by
❦ 25 août 2015 14:46 GMT, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it :
1) please don't set architectures fields that way.
Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way)
leave any.
When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted
On 25-08-15 09:09, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
Hi,
do you understand this lintian warning about incomplete translation?
It complains about the templates file, it looks strange to me.
I believe it complains that there are no translations for the debconf
templates yet. I'm not sure how to get
Em 25/08/2015, à(s) 13:39, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it escreveu:
Hi,
ITP is Intent To Package [1]
PAPT is Python Applications Packaging Team
[1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[2]
On 25/08/15 17:59, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
On 25-08-15 09:09, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
Hi,
do you understand this lintian warning about incomplete translation?
It complains about the templates file, it looks strange to me.
I believe it complains that there are no translations for the debconf
Hi,
Oops...Sorry for that...
By mistake I introduced this bug into the wrapper script.
Patch [1] fixes this bug. And it was fixed in the freshly uploaded
mentor package.
wonderful
Please note that, the linuxbrew installer will pull a manpage of brew
(as above
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:23 AM, J.S.Júnior j.s.jun...@live.com wrote:
What this [ITP,PAPT] ?
https://wiki.debian.org/Glossary
Cheers,
-m
On 25/08/15 17:59, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
On 25-08-15 09:09, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
Hi,
do you understand this lintian warning about incomplete translation?
It complains about the templates file, it looks strange to me.
I believe it complains that there are no translations for the debconf
retitle 789699 RFS: vulture/0.6-1 [ITP] -- Scans for unused (dead) code in a
Pyton program
thanks
wnpp page explains it.
ITP: a new package you want to introduce in debian
ITA: a package you want to adopt.
RC: a serious bug fixed
NMU: a non maintainer upload.
Since pacote is not in
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 16:29 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
yes I got confused by this line
usr/share/man/man7/linuxbrew-wrapper.7.gz usr/share/man/man7/linuxbrew.7.gz
with that symlink, both
man $PACKAGE_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew-wrapper
man $WRAPPER_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew
On 25/08/15 00:19, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 24-08-15 14:10, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
Nicely done, but there is one issue. If you modify conffiles in postinst
it marks them as changed, and this is not something you want to do.
In my branch tomasz-changes I followed ADVANCED
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ross!
The packaging looks really good to me, just a problem on VCS.
DPMT recently rejected my application, so I had to reupload everything
with VCS pointing to collab-maint,
so I'll happily sponsor the package once your application gets approved.
Hi Jeroen,
the package right now is really not suitable for unstable
You can see the lintian warnings errors on the mentors package page.
Can you please fix them?
also the changelog should mention Initial Release: Closes #WNPPBUG)
and the target shouldn't be UNRELEASED
note, many lintian
Hi Lumin,
the packaging now is really fine for me, I'm going to sponsor soonish.
1) I did a buildinstall of the package, and I can't make it work
brew install cmake
brew
brew --help
linuxbrew --help
returns nothing
2) man brew doesn't work, man linuxbrew works
3) looking at the source,
Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
first nitpick: not needed to upload a -2 version. using the same -1
is fine and works until the real upload (on Debian ftp-master) is
performed
I'm used to be very careful (you could also say: paranoid) regarding
On 08/25/2015 03:06 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
the package right now is really not suitable for unstable
You can see the lintian warnings errors on the mentors package page.
Can you please fix them?
also the changelog should mention Initial Release: Closes #WNPPBUG)
and the
28 matches
Mail list logo
