Forget to add pseudo-header when closing a bug

2015-08-26 Thread Alex Vong
Hi everyone, What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as Package: Version: when closing a bug? Should I manaully send something to cont...@bugs.debian.org to achieve the same effect? Any example would be helpful. Cheers, Alex

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

2015-08-26 Thread Jeroen van Aart
On 08/26/2015 01:40 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: much, much better! still a warning in source build-depends: libglib2.0-dev, libglib2.0-dev in source build-depends: libpango1.0-dev, libpango1.0-dev and a missing build dependency (intltool is needed, in a clean environment it doesn't conf

Bug#782074: RFS: ublock/0.9.5.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

2015-08-26 Thread Matthew Bekkema
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ublock" * Package name: ublock Version : 0.9.5.0+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Chris Aljoudi * URL : https://chrismatic.io/ublock/ * License : GPLv3 Section : web It builds those binary p

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 22:18:02 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender > wrote: > For the name of binaries, I would prefer "vulture{,3}" over > "python{,3}-vulture" like Pylint does > it, but it appears Pybuild expects this ... does it? ... but in the end

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ... yeah, this would be an option, Py3 as default is coming up, anyway. > > This is going to be an enhancement for Prospector, which is on Py2, but I > think it runs Vulture > as an ap

Bug#796998: RFS: sfcgal/1.1.0

2015-08-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Sven, Thanks for your work on sfcgal. On 26-08-15 20:17, Sven Geggus wrote: > I have just uploaded a new Version of sfcgal to mentors.debian.net. > > This is a very minor change. I included a patch from upstream which will > make it compile again using boost boost 1.58 and gcc5 The Tracker r

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

2015-08-26 Thread Jeroen van Aart
On 08/26/2015 01:40 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: (I'll take care of warnings related to the package soon) Some questions: I installed it, and it installed many xfce dependencies on my system. The problem is that when I rebooted xfce isn't shown at the login screen. I had to manually do an

Bug#796998: RFS: sfcgal/1.1.0

2015-08-26 Thread Sven Geggus
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I have just uploaded a new Version of sfcgal to mentors.debian.net. This is a very minor change. I included a patch from upstream which will make it compile again using boost boost 1.58 and gcc5 * Package name: sfcgal Version :

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

2015-08-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Another little review: running wrap-and-sort might help you in spotting duplicated dependencies in the control file, and makes it look better. watch file has comments that needs to be stripped https://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-watch-contains-dh_make-template.html and please enable the

Bug#796828: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8

2015-08-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Jeroen, >Thanks for the comments. I think I have fixed most or all issues you >mentioned. I uploaded a new version and there were no warnings this >time. However please let me know if anything is still wrong or missing. >Version now is 1.3.8-1. much, much better! still a warning in sour

Bug#795771: RFS: dblatex/0.3.7-1

2015-08-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Andreas, >I'm used to be very careful (you could also say: paranoid) regarding >publishing: never publish anything changed under the same release number >as before, even if it's only a release candidate on mentors. > >But as this seems to be overdone, I will merge the two changelog >sections

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

2015-08-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
>with that symlink, both > > man $PACKAGE_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew-wrapper > man $WRAPPER_NAME i.e. man linuxbrew > >work. sure, I just got confused between linuxbrew and brew :) >Oops, that's a typo, in fact I mean the 'x' mode, not 'r'. >After all how can the ruby interpreter interpr