New package has been uploaded to:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pam-ufpidentity
with the following changes:
* SINGLE changelog entry - Initial release (Closes: #813073)
* same names for same names for copyright and upstream owner AND control
* vcs stuff without ";a=summary"
* Makefile: the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I hope you are now as delighted as I was to finally reap the fruits of
your labour, after having waded through all the dependent packages.
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "acmetool":
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "android-platform-system-core"
* Package name: android-platform-system-core
Version : 1:6.0.1+r16-3
Upstream Author : The Android Open Source Project
* URL : htt
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:30:55 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: printrun/0~20150310-1 [ITP] -- 3D printing host
has caused the Debian Bug report #814452,
regarding RFS: printrun/0~20150310-1 [ITP] -- 3D printing host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:30:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #812216,
regarding RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> One of my package, nayty not to mention it [1], has a new copyright
> notice [2] that is compatible now.
Great news!
The license text looks unfamiliar. Please discuss it on the
‘debian-legal’ forum to verify that this work is now DFSG-conformant.
> Is there any special
Hello Forum:
One of my package, nayty not to mention it [1], has a new copyright notice [2]
that is compatible now.
Is there any special procedure to follow to migrate a package from non-free to
main ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nauty.html
[2] http://users.
Tiago Ilieve writes:
> - A lintian error "python-script-but-no-python-dep" is being shown for
> both binaries (symlinks in "/usr/bin"). The "${python:Depends}" in the
> binary package shouldn't be sufficient to fix this?
Not by itself. You need to run something that will actually use that
substi
Hi,
I'm packaging a Python application named "pythonpy"[1] (ITP bug
#817856[2]). It has been uploaded to mentors[3] and there's a
repository on GitHub[4].
There's a few things which aren't fixed yet, which I would welcome help, like:
- A lintian error "python-script-but-no-python-dep" is being s
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:39 +0200, Nikos Tsipinakis wrote:
> > The highlighting feature seems to be broken (no idea if this is a
> > problem in newsbeuter or ncurses; I haven't retried to rebuild 2.8-2
> > to check). Too show what I mean: I have in my ~/.newsbeuter/config
> Apparently this issue
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:03:32 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1649044749.12078311.1457647412823.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#817833: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.11.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #817833,
regarding RFS: python-dtcwt/0.11.0-1
to be marked as done
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-dtcwt"
* Package name: python-dtcwt
Version : 0.11.0-1
Upstream Author : Rich Wareham
* URL : https://github.com/rjw57/dtcwt
* License : BSD
Sect
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-github-cheggaaa-pb":
git clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-cheggaaa-pb.git
cd golang-github-cheggaaa-pb && pristine-tar checkout
../golang-git
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1":
git clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1.git
cd golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1 && pristine-tar check
Hi Andreas,
I've update the sse3 patch to not enable sse3 and not define __SSE3,
and added an sse2 code path to emulate the _mm_hadd_pd instruction
where needed.
It compiles, and the alignment sequence test reports the same "failures
"and "passed" like the completely unpatched version.
However
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:25:01PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Thanks for your interest in newsbeuter; I like it and use it daily :)
> And I was looking forward to a version which needs less memory than
> Iceweasel; but for me 2.9 has a massive problem:
>
> The highlighting feature seems to be
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux"
Package name: tinymux
Version : 2.6.5.34-1
Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis
URL : http://www.tinymux.or
Hello,
> _mm_hadd_pd is a sse3 intrinsic so you have to pass -msse3 to allow
> GCC to use it. However, this will cause a SIGILL on any amd64/i386
> processor without sse3 so instead the code should be replaced with
> something more portable.
Actually, the compile command defines -D__SSE3, and t
Hi James,
thanks for the fast response:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:49:23PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 14:39 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I#m facing a C++ problem with the new version of iqtree. If I build the
> > current state in Git[1] I get:
> >
> > ..
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 14:39 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I#m facing a C++ problem with the new version of iqtree. If I build the
> current state in Git[1] I get:
>
> ...
> [ 7%] Building C object pll/CMakeFiles/pll.dir/evaluateGenericSpecial.c.o
> cd /build/iqtree-1.4.0+dfsg/obj-x86_64
Hi,
I#m facing a C++ problem with the new version of iqtree. If I build the
current state in Git[1] I get:
...
[ 7%] Building C object pll/CMakeFiles/pll.dir/evaluateGenericSpecial.c.o
cd /build/iqtree-1.4.0+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/pll && /usr/bin/cc -DIQ_TREE
-D_USE_PTHREADS -D__SSE3 -I/bu
21 matches
Mail list logo
