[02:41:29 main]$ dput mentors-ftp fed_0.94a-1_source.changes
Package has already been uploaded to mentors-ftp on mentors.debian.net
Nothing more to do for fed_0.94a-1_source.changes
Still not showing up under 'my packages'... fingers are now crossed
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Herbert Elwood
G,
I wasn't able to use that dput.cf, but I did use your dpkg-* info .. I will
see if this time using Steffen's upload method worked.
log:
[02:33:54 main]$ dput mentors-ftp fed_0.94a-1_source.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Thu Apr 7 02:32:10 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
I usually do
dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa
dput mentors ../packagename_version_source.changes
this should work.
my ~/.dput.cf
[mentors]
method = ftp
fqdn= mentors.debian.net
incoming= .
login = anonymous
I use dput-ng, and I ha
Your message dated Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:23:22 + (UTC)
with message-id <467940803.1120319.1460010202217.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#820234: RFS: cligh/0.2-4 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #820234,
regarding RFS: cligh/0.2-4 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means th
> >Vcs-Browser:
> >https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
> >Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
> please note: std-version is 3.9.8 now.
Fixed. New version on mentors.
--
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:02 PM, 立花一樹 wrote:
> 1. This source includes python script code which is named "crpp".
> But this code is implemented in python2.
> It goes against Debian policy.
Python 2 is fine at this point in time. It would be nice if upstream
could support Python 3 as well s
Hello,
My name is Kazuki Tachibana.
I'm trying to make package about linux-firewire-utils(URL:
https://github.com/cladisch/linux-firewire-utils).
But I run into an unexpected obstacle, such as:
1. This source includes python script code which is named "crpp".
But this code is implemented in
Well, it's not large.. um, yeah no dice still no packages appearing under
"my packages"
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Steffen Möller
wrote:
> Sounds large ;)
>
> Thumbs pressed.
>
> Steffen
>
>
> On 07/04/16 02:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
> > I guess AFAIK from FAQ
> >
> >
> >
Your message dated Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:25:43 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: igb/5.3.3.2-4 [ITP] -- out of tree Intel Gigabit
Ethernet driver.
has caused the Debian Bug report #804283,
regarding RFS: igb/5.3.3.2-4 [ITP] -- out of tree Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver.
to be marke
Yeah, right, it may confuse people. I changed that in Copyright. Take a
look again.
cheers,
sergio-br2
On 06/04/2016 11:36, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho :
MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one.
Also, it's based on s
Mattia,
On 6 April 2016 at 19:58, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I see, cool.
>
> Then, uploaded :)
I saw that it is now on the NEW queue. Thank you very much!
P.s.: can you please push the release tag to the collab-maint repo? :-)
Regards,
Tiago.
--
Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve
Blog: https://blog.myhro.in
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> On my earlier attempts (<=0.5.1-1) I did include some patches that were
> aimed towards fixing pep8/flake8 warnings, although I dropped them on
> the 0.5.3 package. The reason was that upstream has expressed his
> willingness to ignore E5
Sounds large ;)
Thumbs pressed.
Steffen
On 07/04/16 02:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
> I guess AFAIK from FAQ
>
>
> How long will it take until my upload is available to sponsors?
>
> If you upload via FTP, which you must do if a package is too large for
> the HTTP uploader, the
I guess AFAIK from FAQ
How long will it take until my upload is available to sponsors?
If you upload via FTP, which you must do if a package is too large for the
HTTP uploader, then there can be up to a 30 minute delay before your
package gets processed.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Herbert
Steffen,
Thanks. One discrepancy was that I was attempting HTTP before, though I
did switch to ftp ... regardless, following your instructions, I was able
to FTP properly!
However, after uploading, my package did not appear under "my packages" at
mentors.debian.net -- is this not instantaneous,
On 07/04/16 01:12, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
> Thanks all.. except:
>
>
> [19:11:24 main]$ dput -f mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
> Checking signature on .changes
> gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
> gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (f
Thanks all.. except:
[19:11:24 main]$ dput -f mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <
herb.gillil...@gmail.com>"
Good signature on /home/main/
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
>Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
>Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
please fix
please note: std-version is 3.9.8 now.
g.
Il Mercoledì 6 Aprile 2016
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:58:17 +
with message-id <20160406225817.gi16...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #820029,
regarding RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 04/06/2016 11:47 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> And if I read your multiarch-find-lib right, it doesn't
>> appear to even handle shebang-interpreters at the moment?
>
> Actually it handles shebang-interpreters [...]
Ok, sorry, I
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > So, the thing is, now it's in an arch:all package; it examines the program
> > that the user asked it to run, then chooses the
> > /usr/lib/*/dante-client/libdsocksd.so
> > file for the correct architectu
Hi Mattia,
On 6 April 2016 at 13:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> umh, reading it like that looks to me that it runs against the sources
> only. Am I wrong? DEP-8 tests should test against the installed
> packages.
Although written in a conventional "test_*.py" file, all the tests in
there calls th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cligh"
* Package name: cligh
Version : 0.2-4
Upstream Author : Christopher M. Brannon
* Url : http://the-brannons.com/software/cligh.html
* Licenses: BS
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> So, the thing is, now it's in an arch:all package; it examines the program
> that the user asked it to run, then chooses the
> /usr/lib/*/dante-client/libdsocksd.so
> file for the correct architecture (thus the multiarch-find-lib tool), puts it
> into LD_PRELOAD, then runs
Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. I have just uploaded a new version of
the package to mentors [1] that fixes some of the issues, although I'd
appreciate some further clarification or guidance on a few others:
> $ codespell --quiet-level=3
>
> $ pyflakes .
>
> $ pyflakes3 .
>
> $ pep8 --ignore
* Peter Pentchev , 2016-04-06, 17:33:
I prefer autoreconf instead of autotools-dev
Yep, that's part of the reason I updated to debhelper 10; please see
the changelog of debhelper-9.20160402 and 9.20160403 :) Still, there
are some packages and weird architectures that need autotools-dev *in
ad
FYI: libpng-dev is now provided by libpng16 in unstable.
Transition started a few minutes ago, so I expect some uninstallabilities in
the next few days, but ppsspp should become installable by the end of this week.
cheers,
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:39:46AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 09:49, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > And also I now notice that you're missing a python (or python-all)
> > build-dep, which is kind of redundant but still mandated.
>
> Actually, I don't know what I was thinking at th
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:46:53 + (UTC)
with message-id <2002129335.600777.1459957613061.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#820209: RFS: rgbpaint/0.8.7-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #820209,
regarding RFS: rgbpaint/0.8.7-6
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am searching for a sponsor of my source package "rgbpaint":
Package name: rgbpaint
Version : 0.8.7-6
Upstream Author : Dmitry Groshev
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtpaint/files/rgbpaint/
Li
On 5 April 2016 at 13:52, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> so, please remove the moreinfo tag once you have a feedback from -boot team.
Will do. 'hope they rsvp soon!
> also a reverse-dependency needs fixing here
> https://codesearch.debian.net/results/btrfs-tools-udeb/page_0
> partman-btrfs
Fix
damn, I saw debian-policy in deferred/10 or whatever, I wasn't aware it got
accepted today :)
thanks!
>No, this package is still alive and well, it contains the "socksify" tool
>that preloads the Dante libraries necessary to run a network program using
>a SOCKS proxy - pretty much the main r
hi again, i forget to say:
only the name and trademark are copyright, the code portion are pgl by nicola
http://mamedev.org/?p=422 las line said that only the name are
trademark, if u revised the code seems some portions of the emulator
are changed to a more flexible, so this package must be revi
Mattia,
On 6 April 2016 at 09:49, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> you forgot to add python-path-and-address and python3-path-and-address
> to build-deps.
Indeed. "python3-requests" was missing as well. Notice that building
it again on a clean sid install.
> And also I now notice that you're missing a p
2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho :
> MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one.
>Also, it's based on some portions of old mame code:
> https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7
i already know, ok i not explain too much, but ...
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:39:07PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Peter,
> changes are huge!
Yes, they are... I've put off updating dante from 1.2.x to 1.4.x for
a couple of years :(
> lets see:
>
> some copyrights are missing
> # C
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:14:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <2042356280.427851.1459952095858.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#820203: RFS: cdist/4.0.0~pre3-2 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #820203,
regarding RFS: cdist/4.0.0~pre3-2 ITP
to be marked as done.
Hi Piccoro,
MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one. Also, it's
based on some portions of old mame code:
https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7
regards,sergio-br2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
* Package name: cdist
Version : 4.0.0~pre3-2
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* Licenses
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Peter,
changes are huge!
lets see:
some copyrights are missing
# Copyright (C) 1994 X Consortium
Radical Eye Software
Internet Software Consortium.
licensecheck * -r
reports lots of missing licenses (BSD-4 as example)
while your "other" lice
The mame license its now commercial compatible and GPL compatible
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
2016-04-05 22:27 GMT-04:30 Sérgio Benjamim :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hey dear mentors!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "li
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets do another try
1) please remove the changelog entries.
"averell (1.0a-1) unstable; urgency=low" <-- this one too
2)
override_dh_auto_test
override_dh_auto_install:
why?
3) copyright:
ISC license missing
grep copyright . -Ri
many people missing
automatic
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: minor
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dante". This is
both a new upstream version with many bugfixes and new features
and also almost a full overhaul of the Debian packaging under
the guise of using new features of the build tools.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review!
rules:
>-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release
please RelWithDebInfo here
>override_dh_auto_test:
# Don't run CTest
please explain
changelog:
>Bug#780516
syntax error. bug: #780516 is right
control:
priority -> optional
>Vcs-Git:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:11:40PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> As the new version of "python-responses" has hit unstable, the test
> were enabled with the following patch:
>
> http://paste.debian.net/424537/
you forgot to add python-path-and-address and python3-path-and-address
t
> >Too fast. I improved d/rules and installed THANKS file. New revision
> >in on mentors. I do not expect new release anytime soon, so probably
> >it worth reject previous version and upload new one. Sad to bother
> >FTP-masters.
> I asked that on irc a few seconds ago :)
> >Sorry for misunderst
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Victor,
- please meld changelog in a single entry
-
install_requires = [
'neovim>=0.1.3',
'click>=3.0',
'pygobject'
]
please add them as build-dependencies and check that python3:Depends do its job
upstreaming the desktop file and the svg file
Hi,
>Too fast. I improved d/rules and installed THANKS file. New revision
>in on mentors. I do not expect new release anytime soon, so probably
>it worth reject previous version and upload new one. Sad to bother
>FTP-masters.
I asked that on irc a few seconds ago :)
>Sorry for misunderstanding,
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:38:12 + (UTC)
with message-id <1271557540.122055.1459935492044.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#819181: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.7 - Another System Definition
Facility
has caused the Debian Bug report #819181,
regarding RFS: cl-asdf/2:3.1.7-
Hi Gianfranco,
I have uploaded a new version with the changes.
Thank you for looking into it.
Kambiz
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
hi, lets review again
"make DESTDIR=debian/niceshaper PREFIX=debian/niceshaper/usr
BINDIR=debian/niceshaper/usr/bin install"
please let dh_auto_install do its job, and maybe use
something like "DESTDIR?=/usr" or similar to avoid forcing a wrong val
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
- maybe you should put this package under pkg-java umbrella
- please ask upstream to relicense the documentation
- Tag: devel::compiler, devel::interpreter, devel::lang:scheme, (missing space
at
the begin)
Build-Depends: debhelper (
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
check-all-the-things review:
Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
debian/copyright: please use the same upstream license, and for Debian
packaging
LGPL-2.1 seems unfeasible anyway (I think
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
Standards-Version: 3.9.6 --> outdated, 3.9.7 now
check-all-the-things review:
find -type f \( -iname '*.sh' -o -iname '*.bash' -o -iname '*.zsh' \) -exec
shellcheck {} +
Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/Up
54 matches
Mail list logo
