Bug#811455: RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]

Hi Mattia, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I completely forgot to reply to your last email. I removed the debug package, bumped the standards version, and removed the Lintian override. As for the test suite, I was able to reproduce the failure and found the cause of the

Bug#825126: marked as done (RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 20:47:40 + (UTC) with message-id <756086665.2351912.1464036460432.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825126: RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #825126, regarding RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2 to be marked as done.

Bug#825126: RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scantailor" Package name: scantailor Version : 0.9.12.2-2 Upstream Author : Nate Craun URL : http://scantailor.org/ License : GPL-3+

Bug#822107: marked as done (RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 17:52:26 + (UTC) with message-id <67274442.2180220.1464025946310.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #822107, regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#825105: marked as done (RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 16:37:21 + (UTC) with message-id <71202530.2115810.1464021442015.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825105, regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ *

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

On 23/05/2016 23:52, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 15:39, Jonathon Love wrote: hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000,

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT:

Bug#820488: RFS: roadfighter/1.0.1269-1 [ITP] -- Drive a car in a death race

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:07:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > I'm worried about fonts/*.ttf. If these fonts are packaged in Debian they > shouldn't be shipped in the binary package. Otherwise, there is no info > that they are free, no license, no canonical name etc. In any case > shipping

Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library

Hi Mattia and Gianfranco, yes I haven't answered recently because I've been working with upstream to tune the installation part and deal with the interface version that was not correctly handled. The patch is pushed upstream and I've asked for a new tarball release this morning which should come

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: > > Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging > > there are a

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

Sorry for replying to my own mail. I just noticed that the Debian packaged libf2c really has no symbol i_len_trim. Will check what version is packaged and how this can be fixed. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > your very helpful hints helped

Bug#822107: marked as done (RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:46:48 + (UTC) with message-id <1353418483.1652467.1464000408369.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#822107: RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #822107, regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

http://ftp.kevag-telekom.de/mirrors/gentoo.org/rsync/sci-libs/clapack/files/clapack-3.2.1-noblasf2c.patch seems that the i_len_trim.c file might be somewhere else, look at gentoo packaging, they seem to have not stripped it from the tarball I guess. Does this helps? G. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

Hi Gianfranco, your very helpful hints helped me to get some steps forward. However, its not finally done. On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:48:36AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c > >rather than building the one that comes

Bug#808783: marked as done (RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 11:16:36 +0100 with message-id <5742d884.1010...@rezozer.net> and subject line RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer has caused the Debian Bug report #808783, regarding RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer to be marked as done.

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

On Monday, 23 May 2016 9:08:20 AM AEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months? Not much from packaging prospective. Upstream however show some signs of improvement as they've started using GitHub: https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs > Dmitry setted the

Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Folks, it appeared that the upstrem team does not show very cooperative, so I am postponing the maintenance the Debian package openviewerfx. Meanwhile, I thanks Markus Koschany for reviewing the package. Sorry for the

Bug#808782: marked as done (RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4))

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:37:53 +0100 with message-id <5742cf71.3010...@rezozer.net> and subject line RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4) has caused the Debian Bug report #808782, regarding RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding

Bug#816396: RFS: vizigrep/1.3-1 ITP

Hi Jason! On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:09:47PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > hi, lets review: Did anything happen in the past 1,5 months? Are you still interested in this package? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

Hi Carlos! On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:30:51PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > I have a few comments on this pavkage. This was Feb 16, more than 3 months ago, but with no replies from you. Are you still interested in this package? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE

Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library

Hi Frederic, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:53:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging > and see if it was similar? This was the last recentish email, but anyway there have been 3 replies to your RFS request since Feb,

Bug#812216: marked as done (RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 09:14:23 + with message-id <20160523091420.ga5...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#812216: RFS suspended until further notice has caused the Debian Bug report #812216, regarding RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Bug#811455: RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]

Hi Nathan! On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:51:22PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo Did anything happened here in the past 1,5 months? Are you still interested in getting this into Debian? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: > > Obvious way to improve packaging would be to address Lintian warnings, > > introduce support for Systemd etc. Sorry I don't have time for in-depth > > review and at the moment I have no intention to sponsor MooseFS...

Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:45:16AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Firstly I apologies for my very late reply. > Secondly, thanks you for your sponsorship. Is anything happening here? ~2,5 months passed since the last email. @Markus: if you are committing to reviwing and eventually sponsor a

Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)

Hi Jerome, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:52:39AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Meanwhile OpenViewerFX moved to GitHub and thing get clearer for me: > I am not sure that this pacakge is indeed still needed. > For now I will focus on the OpenViewerFX package. > The probability is high that I abandon

Bug#808231: marked as done (RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:55:35 + with message-id <20160523085532.ga4...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808231: RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #808231, regarding RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#807763: Looking for help to solve licence and third-party issues of the tomahawk-player package

Hi Stefan, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:48:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi sorry for the late answer, it took a while to have time to dig into the > issue. Did anything happen here in the past 2,5 months? -- regards, Mattia

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Hi Lumin, Ghislain >An update to this, according to >https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.html >Even if I want to add some testsuite for python-caffe, I don't need >to add those runtime deps in control, I can add them in tests/control >instead, by adding "Depends"

Bug#819394: marked as done (RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:08:29 + (UTC) with message-id <1193332644.1357295.1463990909802.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#819394: RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #819394, regarding RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP] to be marked as done.

Luidspreker herstelling

[ Is deze mail niet goed leesbaar? Klik hier voor de webversie. ](http://p.n2g19.com/l/212613301/c/0-ipbs-obju4j-12jp) (http://loudspeakerrepair.com)       == SERVICECENTER =   ==   == [LUIDSPREKER

Re: Best practise for a drop-in replacement of a non-free package

Paul Wise writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> My question is more the first step , which includes giza as a library >> with the /potential/ to replace pgplot, but without a strong >> recommendation. > > Since the SONAMEs are different, you