Bug#829405: marked as done (RFS: glances/2.6.2-2)

2016-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2016 03:19:47 -0500 with message-id <20160703081947.GA10266@localhost> and subject line Re: RFS: glances/2.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #829405, regarding RFS: glances/2.6.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#829208: [PATCH] evil-paredit: relax dependency on paredit

2016-07-03 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Hello! I am now packaging your library evil-paredit for Debain. It declares dependency on paredit "25beta", but * paredit-25beta upstream consider it unstable and advices aganist beeing packaged * seems evil-paredit works fine with paredit-24 * seems commits 86d8ab33c, 6eea8638a explicitly a

Bug#829408: marked as done (RFS: img2pdf/0.2.0-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- Lossless conversion of raster images to PDF)

2016-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:26:04 + (UTC) with message-id <595292987.1592802.1467541564531.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829408: RFS: img2pdf/0.2.0-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- Lossless conversion of raster images to PDF has caused the Debian Bug report #829408, regardi

Bug#829286: marked as done (RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2)

2016-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:37:35 + (UTC) with message-id <968078331.194.1467542255278.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #829286, regarding RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-03 Thread Ben Finney
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘xkcdpass’, version “1.6.3-1”. It builds those binary packages: xkcdpass - secure passphrase generator inspired by XKCD 936 To access further information about this package, please visit

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

2016-07-03 Thread Ben Finney
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: block 829407 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘jquery-throttle-debounce’: * Package name: jquery-throttle-debounce Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Ben Alman URL : http://benalm

dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i am clueless how to untangle the contradicting perceptions of apt-get and dpkg-checkbuilddeps about installation state of libacl1-dev. While running (after debuild -S with normal messages) debuild -b i get dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: libacl1-dev dpkg-buildp

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 03:49 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: libacl1-dev > > This is doubly strange, because it worked for libisofs 1.4.2-3 before i did > apt-get "update" and "dist-upgrade" today (7 Jul 2016), and because now > > apt-get install libac

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Christian Seiler wrote: > What does > dpkg -l libacl1-dev > say? $ dpkg -l libacl1-dev Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Ve

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 04:07 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> What does >> dpkg -l libacl1-dev >> say? > > $ dpkg -l libacl1-dev > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Christian Seiler wrote: > You should be able to fix that via: > dpkg --configure --pending This gives ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libacl1-dev: libacl1-dev depends on libc6-dev | libc-dev; however: Package libc6-dev:amd64 is not configured yet. Packa

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 04:35 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libacl1-dev: >libacl1-dev depends on libc6-dev | libc-dev; however: > Package libc6-dev:amd64 is not configured yet. > Package libc-dev is not installed. >

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘xkcdpass’, version “1.6.3-1”. You may want to talk to upstream about using argcomplete for automatic bash completion instead of manually maintaining the bash completion file separately to the existing a

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, the latest proposals by Christian Seiler obviously solved the problem. Many thanks for pulling me out of the swamp. Details: apt-get dist-upgrade wrote: > > Errors were encountered while processing: > >/var/cache/apt/archives/libosinfo-db_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 05:32 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Now i can concentrate on the problem why lintian underneath debuild -S says: You are using an older version of lintian (probably the one from Jessie). If you use lintian from sid, it will properly say that 3.9.8 is the latest version (and a couple of

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Christian Seiler wrote: > You are using an older version of lintian (probably the one from Jessie). It is what apt-get "update" and "dist-upgrade" gave me on Sid. It was downloaded during "dist-upgrade": Get:611 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 lintian all 2.5.45 [1,036

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 06:46 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> You are using an older version of lintian (probably the one from Jessie). > > It is what apt-get "update" and "dist-upgrade" gave me on Sid. > It was downloaded during "dist-upgrade": > > Get:611 http://ftp.de.debian.org

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

2016-07-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘jquery-throttle-debounce’: I'm not completely satisfied with the packaing, sorry! look e.g. to the various node-* packages, they seem to be "clean" in the debian directory, your packaging seems more

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘xkcdpass’, version “1.6.3-1”. I like xkcd, so I'll look at it :) ^L %: why do you have some extra chars in your files? your packaging seems full of bad line endings, my vim is sad to look at them!

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

2016-07-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, July 03 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. If I may, I'd like to propose that > >>you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if >>Andrey doesn't reply. I'd really like to get these fixes uploaded ASAP. > > > fine for me, you

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Christian Seiler wrote: > I would highly recommend you doing an apt-get dist-upgrade again So let's see how a successful end of dist-upgrade looks like: # apt-get dist-upgrade ... 544 upgraded, 44 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/622 MB of archives.

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps and apt-get at odds over libacl1-dev

2016-07-03 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/03/2016 08:38 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Christian Seiler wrote: >> I would highly recommend you doing an apt-get dist-upgrade again > > So let's see how a successful end of dist-upgrade looks like: > [...] > No fireworks on success ? Looks good. To be sure, you can run apt-get dist-upgrad

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

2016-07-03 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 14:28 -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Sunday, July 03 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > as a DM, I'm pretty sure (but I can't check this anymore since I > > moved to DD), > > that you can reschedule stuff for other people too. > > Can you please try this com

Bug#815791: RFS: gtranscribe/0.3-1 [ITP] -- simple GTK+ tool focussed on easy transcription of spoken words

2016-07-03 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Paul, On 23.05.2016 at 07:31, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> I found that the issue only happens after the file has played through >> completely. If you change the speed before playback has started or >> during playback it doesn't happen, only when t

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP

2016-07-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mbpfan" Package name: mbpfan Version : 1.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Graziotin URL : https://github.com/dgraz

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

2016-07-03 Thread Sean Whitton
control: noowner -1 control: tag -1 +confirmed -moreinfo Dear Dmitry, In my view evil-paredit-el is ready to be uploaded, bar `dch -r`. Thanks. -- Sean Whitton

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

2016-07-03 Thread Ben Finney
Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > I'm not completely satisfied with the packaing, sorry! Thank you for taking this sponsorship request. > look e.g. to the various node-* packages, they seem to be "clean" in > the debian directory, your packaging seems more complicate Can you point me to specific

managing patches

2016-07-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr
Hello mentors I have a question regarding managing patches. I am wondering is there a way to merge multiple patches into one or is there way to rollback from a patch? As I am working I am see that making mulitple diffs after I make a change, then another if the previous one did not work. I sear

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

2016-07-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, July 03 2016, James Cowgill wrote: >> Hm, here's what I see when I try it: >> >>   D: dcut 0.2.1 >>   D: trying to get maintainer email from environment >>   D: Uploader from env: Sergio Durigan Junior >>   D: first argument "ftp-master" treated as host >>   D: loading dput >>   D: ca