On 09/06/17 03:32, vita...@ciubotaru.tk wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much for your reply. Of course, I've been consulting the Debian policy while
preparing the package. After receiving your email I re-read that chapter again, but I am still
unsure what I did wrong. If I understand correctly, the
Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one
(iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a
notation I don't know:
3:20161105-1
- Which is this software's version? 3?
- What is the best formula for "control" file in my new package, having
present that any ve
Hi,
On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one
> (iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a
> notation I don't know:
> 3:20161105-1
>
> - Which is this software's version? 3?
This is documented in debian-poli
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
administrator should fix this.
El 09/06/17 a les 14:01, James Cowgill ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>> Hello, I'm trying to
Hi,
On 09/06/17 13:11, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> El 09/06/17 a les 14:01, James Cowgill ha escrit:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>>> Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one
>>> (iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a
>>> notat
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:11:22PM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Okay, I didn't want that this lintian error affected Depends and/or
> Recommends too:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/depends-on-build-essential-package-without-using-version.html
Have you read the tag description? It says you don't
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:27:38 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: xtensor/0.10.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #86,
regarding RFS: xtensor/0.10.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:27:38 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-pyepsg/0.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #864445,
regarding RFS: python-pyepsg/0.3.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:40:14 + (UTC)
with message-id <286368376.10264037.1497026414...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#864446: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #864446,
regarding RFS: arc-theme/20170302-2
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:30:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <446062761.10421957.1497033029...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#862371: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #862371,
regarding RFS: budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Thanks Gianfranco,
I am currently working on a revised package that fixes some issues -
I will also include the fixes for the debian/rules review comments
from your good-self - much appreciated.
David
On 9 June 2017 at 19:33, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> This is an automatic notificati
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
* Package name: flake8-polyfill
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Ian Cordasco
* URL : https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8-polyfill
* License : MI
hi, note that we can't sync in Ubuntu until you move the files in the correct
location :)
(otherwise you will need breaks+replaces)
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tss2"
* Package name: tss2
Version : 851-2
Upstream Author : Ken Goldman
* URL :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/files/NotForUsers_Debian
14 matches
Mail list logo
