Bug#864702: marked as done (RFS: galternatives/0.13.6 [ITA])

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:55:17 +0200 with message-id <20170614035517.uetuz765jrlvo...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#864702: RFS: galternatives/0.13.6 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #864702, regarding RFS: galternatives/0.13.6 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#864626: RFS: visual-fill-column/1.11-1 [ITP]

Hi Sean, On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:34:20PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:35:21PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > I do not yet have DM privileges for this package, but if I had > > uploaded the new build (with the same version) using dput, would it > > have been

Bug#864622: RFS: rich-minority/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Sean, On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:42:28PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Nicholas, > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:33:12PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Would it be better to ship README.org and file a bug against the > > package myself? > > Yes. Why not ship README.org in the

Bug#862874: marked as done (RFS: tss2/851-1 [ITP] -- IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS) for TPM 2.0 and related utilities)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:28:33 -0400 with message-id <3b92b1d2-4388-d3d5-737a-f5e85be24...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #862874, regarding RFS: tss2/851-1 [ITP] -- IBM's TCG Software Stack (TSS) for TPM 2.0 and related utilities to be marked

Bug#864737: RFS: cid/9.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cid" * Package name: cid Version : 9.0-1 Upstream Author : Eduardo Moraes * URL : https://c-i-d.sourceforge.io * License : GPL-3+

Bug#864622: RFS: rich-minority/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hello Nicholas, On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:33:12PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Would it be better to ship README.org and file a bug against the > package myself? Yes. Why not ship README.org in the interim? > I still don't have a plan for Policy 12.4, and am currently wondering > if

Bug#864626: RFS: visual-fill-column/1.11-1 [ITP]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:35:21PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I do not yet have DM privileges for this package, but if I had > uploaded the new build (with the same version) using dput, would it > have been rejected? Yes. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#864688: marked as done (RFS: xtensor/0.10.4-1)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:28:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1114937271.15317957.1497374935...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#864688: RFS: xtensor/0.10.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864688, regarding RFS: xtensor/0.10.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#864702: RFS: galternatives/0.13.6 [ITA]

在 2017年6月13日星期二 +08 上午10:10:33，Boyuan Yang 写道： > I am looking for a sponsor for adopted package "galternatives" > It builds those binary package(s): > galternatives - graphical setup tool for the alternatives system > > Unfortunately mentors.d.o upload is temporarily 403 here, so one can >

Bug#864713: RFS: cod-tools/2.0-5 [ITP] -- tools for manipulation of Crystallographic Information Format files

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cod-tools" * Package name: cod-tools Version : 2.0-5 Upstream Author : Saulius Gražulis , Andrius Merkys , Antanas Vaitkus

Re: [deb-ci] testing sysvinit scripts when both sysvinit and systemd supported by package

Hi, On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:13 +0200, p...@reseau-libre.net wrote: > I'm writting deb-ci tests to check backward support to sysvinit for  > openscap-daemon. I've written a sysvinit script, the systemd service  > file also exists [1]. > > The problem is that the deb-ci test (which run explicitly 

Re: build-depends on a _source_ package ?

Thank you Christian for your clear explanation. I think i only need the headers files, but i will check this before to file a bug to the qtcreator package, so. Thankfully, Benoît Le 13/06/2017 à 08:54, Christian Seiler a écrit : Hi, On 06/12/2017 11:05 PM, Benoît Rouits wrote: Is there a

[deb-ci] testing sysvinit scripts when both sysvinit and systemd supported by package

Hello ! I'm writting deb-ci tests to check backward support to sysvinit for openscap-daemon. I've written a sysvinit script, the systemd service file also exists [1]. The problem is that the deb-ci test (which run explicitly /etc/init.d/openscap-daemon) fails because adt-run create a

Re: build-depends on a _source_ package ?

Hi, On 06/12/2017 11:05 PM, Benoît Rouits wrote: > Is there a solution ? Should i file a bug on WNPP to ask for a > qtcreator-dev package in order to have qtcreator source installed in > /usr/src ? Do you need the entire source of Qt Creator or just some header files? In either case, you can