Bug#892591: marked as done (RFS: pinball/0.3.1-14 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2018 04:20:11 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pinball/0.3.1-14 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #892591, regarding RFS: pinball/0.3.1-14 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#884339: RFS: deepin-movie-reborn/3.1.1-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 - moreinfo Repacked. On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:22:34 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:53PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > > * Package name: deepin-movie-reborn > >Version : 3.1.1-1 > > > > It builds those binary packages: >

Bug#893078: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-2)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2018 01:58:38 +0100 with message-id <20180317005838.g2nfy6gps2vyx...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#893078: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #893078, regarding RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#893094: marked as done (RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-2 [RC])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2018 01:51:45 +0100 with message-id <20180317005145.caocpinq6wuca...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#893094: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #893094, regarding RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This

Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo I've uploaded to mentors a package minus this commit: * Change architecture to linux-any, because btrfs is Linux-only Sadly linux-all is not an available architecture, and "all" explicitly prohibits adding arch-specific dependencies like: Depends: ${misc:Depends}

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Kurt Kremitzki wrote: > > > On 03/15/2018 04:37 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > > > What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review, > > > but I need a break right now...

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

hm, somehow i didn't receive that mail... On 03/15/2018 10:54 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > 1) please fix the qt bug in this upload > 2) missing lots of copyrights, e.g. src/ThirdParty/Catch/* > src/ThirdParty/PEGTL/* > do you need such

Bug#893094: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-2 [RC]

Yavor Doganov wrote: > * Package name: lynkeos.app >Version : 2.10+dfsg1-2 > * debian/patches/gnustep-port.patch: Fix FTBFS on most architectures > (undeclared PAGE_SIZE). As this was reported as a bug (#893097) after my upload to mentors.d.n, I reuploaded the package

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

On 03/15/2018 04:37 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review, but I need a break right now... Will continue later. Ok, went over the package for a copyright review. One part of

Bug#893094: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lynkeos.app". * Package name: lynkeos.app Version : 2.10+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Jean-Etienne Lamiaud * URL : http://lynkeos.sf.net * License :

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hello, >please check if rebuilding works with the version in experimental, in that case >you will need to do something like =5.9, and compute that value at runtime, >rather than hardcoding it >(so a binNMU will work). please fix the stuff I pointed in the rfs, and discard the qt commit. Qt

Bug#893078: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-admin" * Package name: nautilus-admin Version : 1.1.4-2 Upstream Author : Bruno Nova * URL :