Hi!
I seem to have issues getting hold on the previous sponsor (busy/bus/SA ?),
and there's a number of bugs that could use uploading.
The updated package can be found at:
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tcng/tcng_10b-2.dsc
The issues fixed are:
* FTBFS on amd64:
It appears
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:55:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Woh, it's great to hear from you. I'm afraid I've been lazy too, you should
be shown ready patches instead of hearing that's mostly working...
If you do work on patches, please make sure they're against current bzr;
there have
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:03:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:53AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
(Colin, CC-ing you as I'm not sure if you're of aware of this long thread,
and both man-db and groff are your territory...)
I wasn't aware of it, thanks. Sorry
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:02:57PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
The Fungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I can't imagine an ANSI library would be anything more
than a few dozen string constant definitions, unless you wanted
man tput
(no point in hardcoding a few dozen string
(Colin, CC-ing you as I'm not sure if you're of aware of this long thread,
and both man-db and groff are your territory...)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:25:27PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
I proposed Colin to work on it during Debconf, but still had no time to do
it.
Could you tell us if
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-14 20:44]:
libterm-ansicolor-ruby - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape
sequences
[...]
I am a bit curious why should someone not want to use curses
but ansi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 04:13:17PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any such description file would work only as long as you hard-code any
fonts, and somehow provide them for any potential reader. Without this,
wcwidth() is as good as you can get
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:44:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Issues to fix
=
A. man output
B. groff processing
C. man input
Fixes for A. and B. are mostly local to man-db, fixing C. would be a
Debian-wide issue.
What I
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:12:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:09:06PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
There's an important difference between beat the program with a large
cluestick and beat the person with a large cluestick. Adam's
assertion was only that the former was
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:24:08AM +0100, David Given wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
That sounds like a bug. I was under the impression that the default
encoding of everything in lenny was supposed to be UTF-8.
What tool is it that has this different default encoding?
Well, I tried
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:37:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
must display
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
* Package name: tstat
IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but I wonder if we shouldn't ask debian-legal
about these license clauses for erf.c:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
Meep? Whee?
Hey, lookie! Shiny!
RFS:
* Package name: chameleon-cursor-theme
Version : 0.5-1
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Benigno ebengio (at) gmail.com
* URL (upstream) : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=38459
* License : GPL
Section : x11
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
* Package name: bashish
The package is lintian clean.
Er...?
lintian -i bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes |wc -l
30
To be a bit more exact:
lintian bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes -i|head
E: bashish: shell-script-fails-syntax-check
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
* Package name: bashish
Basic usability test:
Installed the package.
Ran it as user (TERM=linux, SHELL=bash):
a dialog popped up, asking whether to install it.
Agreed.
Got asked to restart the shell:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
However, I am unable to reproduce your errors
shell-script-fails-syntax-check, what I'm blindly guessing is that
lintian complains (rightfully so, albeit sh -n produces no error since
it is linked to bash :)) that the ksh
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on many terminals, some of bashish themes don't work well, miss some
glyphs, etc. This kind of things is impossible to detect -- at least
not in any portable or semi-portable way
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
No. The package with the later version will overwrite the earlier
one, and this will cause the
Meep?
I am looking for a sponsor for my package vtgamma.
It contains a tool to set gamma correction on the Linux console,
and a simple interactive utility to find out what an appropiate
gamma value would be.
lintian : clean
linda: clean
pbuilder : clean
piuparts : clean
ITP : #377939
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
E: Couldn't download slang1a-utf8
pbuilder: debootstrap failed
Use pbuilder and cdebootstrap from http://www.backports.org/ .
To do that, put:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main
in your
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:19:15PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
On 7/5/06, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:28:59PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
* Package name: ipbt
ipbt - Fast, advanced ttyrec player
Oops, on just loading a typical NetHack
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:28:59PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
* Package name: ipbt
ipbt - Fast, advanced ttyrec player
Oops, on just loading a typical NetHack recording:
real1m36.499s
user1m35.050s
sys 0m0.648s
Something is terribly wrong here, as my very inefficient
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:55:40PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ITP is #213361. The package is foo-clean; the packaging is
trivial (clean autotoolage).
What is this foo package you keep talking about?
I know
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +, Alan Baghumian wrote:
* Package name: xfardic
First, it would be nice if the subject could contain the package's
name. Perhaps the m.d.n boilerplate could include it.
The big four tests:
* lintian:
I'm afraid there are four issues, all in
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:10:53PM +0200, Matej Kosik wrote:
Uff. I wrongly assumed that software available on the internet without
any restrictions (no licensing information, no public domain statement
) could be considered to be public domain. As you say, it is not true.
Thus, the original
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:05AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for tcng, another package of Matthias Urlichs
that I'm adopting.
RC bugs:
[...]
* conflict for the binary name tcc, also found in the package
tcc; it's RC per Policy 10.1. The upstream renamed
Whee!?
I'm adopting hashalot, one of the packages Matthias Urlichs recently
gave away. He doesn't have the time nowadays, so it would be nice if
someone could sponsor this package.
It's a simple package with straightforward packaging.
My changes:
* a cleanup of debian/rules
*
Whee!?
I'm looking for a sponsor for tcng, another package of Matthias Urlichs
that I'm adopting.
This upload fixes two unreported RC issues, introduces a new major
upstream release and fixes 5 of 6 bugs in the BTS.
RC bugs:
* FTBFS outside pbuilder
* conflict for the binary name tcc, also
Whee!?
I'm looking for a sponsor for my pet package kbtin, an extended
beyond recognition fork of tintin++. And, unlike any other MUD
client in Debian, kbtin can be used to play a popular game named
dpkg-buildpackage when piping the output through less and friends
doesn't cut it. At least, less
Whee!?
In an attempt to infringe on commercial free speech, I'm looking for
a sponsor for a new package, dnscruft.
It feeds bind9 a list of domains like:
* doubleclick.net
* googlesyndication.com
and a plethora of other advertisers, spammers, win32 spyware spewers,
phishers and other miscreants
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:11:54PM +0800, Wei Mingzhi wrote:
* Package name: llk-linux
Description : LianLianKan game for GNU/Linux
Well, and (released) Debian, what OS it is? The name and desc of
your package doesn't make any sense to me -- the -linux part is
totally redundant.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:11:54PM +0800, Wei Mingzhi wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
Good luck! As it's in my interest to save the time of actual DDs,
let me help you with the more obvious issues.
* Package name: llk-linux
* Of course, the issue I mentioned
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are
the correct place for the Homepage field.
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
present in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. The description
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:10:25PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Florent Rougon a écrit :
The files pertaining to the Debian packaging are
(c) 2006 Kevin Bube.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
be followed.
Isn't this the case only if someone else than the author translated
the license?
--
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:32:18PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu wrote:
Second, the javadoc documents coming with the source files are Japanese.
Should I prune the documents or include them? How do I include them?
Please, keep them. Removing documentation is a disservice to the
users, even if only a
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:45:15PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:09:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Let's say that the previous post contained some references about the
sites this package blocks. If I made murphy autolearn the package's
name to mark it as spam, will I
Yeah, I've made it.
pasc kilobyte: hah
pasc X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,DRUGSPAM,DRUGSPAM2,
pasc DRUGSPAM3,DRUGS_ERECTILE,IMPRONONCABLE_1,MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,
pasc MURPHY_DRUGS1,SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C,SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VIA
autolearn=spam
pasc I'm surprised you
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Ek Zindagoi wrote:
I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat
system. Can I do that on a debian system ?
As a short-term solution, you can cheat by making a Debian package and
using alien --to-rpm. However, if anyone tries to put your RPMs into one
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Maxime Robache wrote:
I'm looking for comments and for a sponsor concerning the music123
package I just adopted.
1. As it's a maintainer upload, the version number should be 15, not 14.3
-- the latter is used for source NMUs.
2. You may want to add support for other
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Would you know any project to make a kqemu Debian package?
I know there is already a qemu, I just subscribed to the ML, but how
about kqemu?
The problem is, you are not allowed to distribute kqemu. So, the only
thing you will be legally
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Martin Kelly wrote:
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Would you know any project to make a kqemu Debian package?
I know there is already a qemu, I just subscribed to the ML, but how
about kqemu?
It is not open source... you would have to put it in the non-free section.
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Package name: kildclient
Kildclient supports the MCCP (Mud Client Compression Protocol) protocol,
versions 1 and 2, to reduce the necessary bandwidth.
I hope that you're aware that MCCP is a security hole. It assumes that
the server
Do ITPs get their birthday presents? It would be cruel to have #213361
spend its bday in the cramped, smelly BTS. The last RFS ended in a small
flamewar holy warwith heretics who dared to claim that tinyfugue (tf) is
usable...
Right, try to get tf to:
* play a game like dpkg-buildpackage or
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:26:09AM +0200, Daniel Gubser wrote:
Where do I best remove files (config, helpers, etc) which are not needed
anymore from previous versions? In postinst or rules?
Removing users files in rules is a non-sense.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:26:09AM +0200, Daniel Gubser wrote:
Where do I best remove files (config, helpers, etc) which are not needed
anymore from previous versions? In postinst or rules?
Removing users files in rules is a non-sense.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:04:26AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Windows users typically use zMud and Mushclient, and among Unix people the
most popular one is ancient tinyfugue -- dead upstream for 4 years
I'm sorry, but you've just tripped my FUD
Hi mentors!
Judging from several active MUD/MUSH/M*-server packages, that kind of
games is not dead yet -- and servers are worthless without decent clients.
Windows users typically use zMud and Mushclient, and among Unix people the
most popular one is ancient tinyfugue -- dead upstream for 4
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:04:26AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Windows users typically use zMud and Mushclient, and among Unix people the
most popular one is ancient tinyfugue -- dead upstream for 4 years
I'm sorry, but you've just tripped my FUD
Hi mentors!
Judging from several active MUD/MUSH/M*-server packages, that kind of
games is not dead yet -- and servers are worthless without decent clients.
Windows users typically use zMud and Mushclient, and among Unix people the
most popular one is ancient tinyfugue -- dead upstream for 4
Hello, folks!
As the person I asked for sponsoring didn't reply to my mails, could
someone of you check and upload my package? (Just simple sponsoring,
I'm not going to apply for NM yet...). I've put the package on
http://kbtin.sf.net/debian/, and it's lintian- and linda-clean.
The thing is a
Hello, folks!
As the person I asked for sponsoring didn't reply to my mails, could
someone of you check and upload my package? (Just simple sponsoring,
I'm not going to apply for NM yet...). I've put the package on
http://kbtin.sf.net/debian/, and it's lintian- and linda-clean.
The thing is a
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
El martes, 9 de septiembre de 2003, a las 14:27, Andreas Barth escribe:
What about, having the choice of building against both the stable and
the unstable version of a library, choosing the stable
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
El martes, 9 de septiembre de 2003, a las 14:27, Andreas Barth escribe:
What about, having the choice of building against both the stable and
the unstable version of a library, choosing the stable
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:37:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
I've written a fairly simple command-line shuffle music file player.
Despite its simplicity, I find it quite handy, and I don't think there's
any
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:37:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
I've written a fairly simple command-line shuffle music file player.
Despite its simplicity, I find it quite handy, and I don't think there's
any
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
I've written a fairly simple command-line shuffle music file player.
Despite its simplicity, I find it quite handy, and I don't think there's
any other package out there (in Debian or not) that does quite what it
does. The main feature is that it keeps
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Mike Schacht wrote:
I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
distribution. I intend to apply as a NM
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Mike Schacht wrote:
I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
distribution. I intend to apply as a NM
801 - 859 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
