On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> * URL : https://github.com/component/is-module
404
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:41:10AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > > They was fixed by the experimental 0l.10.0-rc3 upstream release, which
> > > eventually became 0.10.0 by upstream and pushed to sid as 0.10.0-1. This
> > > should have been mentioned in -1, but was not, hence the -1 note.
> > If the
Control: retitle -1 RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:32:55PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Why does the report title say "NMU"?
>
> Perhaps it shouldn't - large parts of the debian workflow is still a mystery
> for me.
Please read
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:33:48PM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
> - Merge changelog for 10.2.9-3 Stretch bug-fix release;
> v10.2.9-3 is a hotfix for Stretch released after the v10.3.x
> series was uploaded to testing
10.2.9-3 is not in stretch.
We don't upload to testing.
We don't pr
You already filed an RFS and you haven't answered the feedback there.
Also, why are you calling this a NMU?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:55:57PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the
> debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and
> debian/control has "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10.0.0), binutils (>=
> 2.28.0), autot
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
> I have double checked lintian -i -I for the built .dsc
This checks only the source package which is wrong. You need to check the
binary .changes. Also, you've missed -E --pedantic.
E: budgie-desktop changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstr
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Maintainer and Uploaders contain the same mpvag...@us.ibm.com email.
Priority should be optional.
Current Standards-Version is 4.0.1.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
Why do you explicitly B-D on GCC 5?
Why do you B-D on libudev1 and libcxl1?
Why Vcs-Git
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Why does the report title say "NMU"?
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:41:45PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> * Restore parallel builds, accidentally disabled in -2
debian/compat says 10, so --parallel is the default.
> * Fixed upstream bus #294 (VPATH build issues, in -1).
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:11:26PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The build logs says:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: cannot find library libmux.so needed by
> debian/tinymux/usr/lib/tinymux/game/bin/stubslave (ELF format:
> 'elf64-x86-64' abi: '0201003e
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
The RFS bug severity is wrong.
Please read
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
The version suffix is wrong (you can use dch --nmu to make a correct one
but you should read the devref article on the NMU v
debian/copyright has an incorrect short license name. OTOH the project
license is actually GPL-3+.
etc/pstdint.h and etc/msinttypes-r26.zip aren't mentioned in
debian/copyright.
There is no debian/watch.
--with autoreconf is the default in compat 10.
doc/sat-solver-papers contains sourceless and p
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:32:54AM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal [RC bug will auto-remove package on the 20th]
That statement actually means "put "important" here if RC".
> Changes since t
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Ian A Mason wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> We do not see any lintian warnings:
>
>
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly-dev' in
> '../libpoly-dev_1.4-1_amd64.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly0' in '../libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building pack
The source package name shouldn't contain the soname, please rename the
package to libpoly and retitle the bug accordingly.
include/version.h should be added to debian/clean instead of rm'ing it in
rules.
debian/copyright has an incorrect short license name.
There is no debian/watch.
Please use th
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that).
>
> Now I have to ask for the option needed for lintian to tell that.
It only tells that in the description of tag which is emitted when there
is no header at all.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:42:40AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking
> dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another
> debian maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong?
Yes, .install
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:38:13AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> > Why is the lib installed by code in debian/rules? The upstream build
> > system should do that and it seems it does that, at least partially.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what this means, can you point me to an example?
Exa
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control:
- did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch,
making sure they are complete and necessary.
- why Conflicts: oprofile-modules*? There are no such packages in last
releases.
- Replaces: opro
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:52:33AM +0100, Denys Berkovskyy wrote:
> Thank you for your comments, I have made the changes you mentioned and
> uploaded updated version to https://mentors.debian.net/package/stenc
debian/compat is still 9.
Also, please change priority to optional (and you should have
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
New typos in the changelog entry: "linitian", "descroption". Patch headers
have typos too.
debian/format is garbage.
debian/stamp-patched too.
Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that).
Instead of "Removed pycompat file because lintinan says it is
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:58:04AM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> I'm not so sure about what you mean for uploading here.
Al meant mentors.debian.net.
> Sadly, I don't think this will be in time, because the package will be removed
> tomorrow.
It will be removed only from testing.
--
WBR, wRAR
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 09:46:49PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> 2017-07-29 19:34 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> > * The package now depends on python3
> > Which package?
> It's both a build dependency and a runtime dependency of "cyclograph"
> the main bi
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:03:05PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> The main problem seems to be[0] (amd64 - Mon, 31 Jul 2017):
>
> Found cached translation database
> Merging translations into gthumb-import.desktop.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/glib-mkenums", line 669, in
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:14:13AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > It must be the upstream signature, not yours. Please don't do things you
> > don't understand.
>
> That is uncalled for, Andrey.
>
> This is the Debian mentors forum, we are *encouraging* people to try
> doing things they don't yet u
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:45:44PM +, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> I do not know if I did it correctly, but I had this problem in lintian
> on my program.
>
> But I solved it in my tarball 'orig.tar.gz' by typing:
>
> $ gpg --armor --detach-sign myprogram-0.1.orig.tar.gz
It must be the upst
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:23:44AM -0600, Ben Hildred wrote:
> Please note that when upstream signs a tarball, any changes to that tarball
> such as those done by pristine tar
The whole purpose of pristine-tar is to not make changes.
> or when making a dsfg tarball
Sure.
--
WBR, wRAR
signatur
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:46:35AM -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> > And there I do want uscan to actually check the signature of
> > the new orig tarball it downloads. But that also means that as
> > I'm using the orig tarball from upstream (and pristine-tar is
> > just a weird way of storing it) I thin
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:30:46AM -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> > How does this interact with git-based workflows?
>
> I don't use such workflows so I'm not sure, but at a guess; uscan and
> upstream tarballs aren't involved in your workflow, so you won't have
> upstream tarball signatures either and
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Filip Hroch wrote:
> I encountered the problem some time ago in my Munipack
> package.
What problem?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:46:40AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I suppose "Debian menu system" is not the same as what xdg-desktop-menu
> manages
Yes, the former needs .menu files while the latter uses .desktop.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:55:20AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Do you mean that with only having at the package:
> ./usr/share/applications/xxx.desktop
> ./usr/share/mime/packages/xxx.xml
> triggers are automatically run?
They should (I mean the triggers for update-mime-database and update-mime).
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:41:29AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> A question about my way before packaging: Is a good practice to use this
> in postinst script?
> echo "..." > /tmp/MyType.xml
> xdg-mime install --mode system /tmp/MyType.xml
> echo "..." > /tmp/My-Program.desktop
> xdg-desktop-menu i
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I'm observing how is transmission-gtk packaged and it seems that it's
> not enough with including files as
> ./usr/share/applications/xxx.desktop
> ./usr/share/mime/packages/xxx.xml
>
> but postinst script should run update-menus and
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > And there are other changes (about python for example) that are not listed
> > in the changelog.
> I listed all the changes done to files in the "debian" folder. The
> other changes are
> all made by upstream and, in my understandi
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
You don't need DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS and /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk.
The upstream build system ignores CPPFLAGS.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1.
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please use the priority optional.
The .dsc file is wrong: "dpkg-source: error: file ./fzf_0.16.8.orig.tar.gz
has size 128895 instead of expected 128889".
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descript
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
${shlibs:Depends} for libzimg-examples does nothing and there is a warning
about that in the build log.
Files: src/* doc/* test/* m4/* * should be replaced with just Files: *
Also, usually the License blocks are put after the Files blocks in
d/copyright.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
The project license is GPL-2 while debian/copyright says GPL-2+.
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch tot he debhelper compat level 10.
Otherwise the package seems good.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
The format URL in debian/copyright is, strictly speaking, wrong: it lacks
the trailing slash (you can also switch it to HTTPS while fixing that).
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please change the distribution to unstable.
Please update Standards-Version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
Please drop the python2 subpackage unless some app in Debian needs it.
*:Recommends and *:Suggests substvars don't exist.
The license text in d/c
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Some preliminary remarks:
Why B-D specifically on gcc-6, g++-6?
Version in Depends: lsb-base (>= 3.2-14) can be dropped.
Current Standards-Version is 4.0.0.
Current debian/compat is 10.
Are you sure this Pre-Depends usage is correct? Have you discussed it as
required b
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:10:35PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote:
> > No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1.
> > Please use dch --nmu and read
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
>
> Uploaded a new version with proper name. Thanks
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:42:02PM +0530, Harish Sriram wrote:
> Here is the link to the uploaded package.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/etcd/etcd_3.1.8+dfsg-2
> +nmu1.dsc
No, the correct suffix for non-native package NMUs is .1, not +nmu1.
Please u
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 07:41:12PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> cyclograph (1.9.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>
> [ Federico Brega ]
You don't need to add your name in brackets if there are no other names.
> * Debhelper compat version updated to 9
The current recommended level is 10.
And
Why is this not using dh(1)?
It's also hardcoding /usr/lib and not the multiarch path in d/rules.
Why is changelog-move-to-git-log.patch needed?
There are a lot of strange and ancient things kept from the previous
Debian package, yet d/changelog doesn't have the old entries. OTOH
d/copyright doesn
Control: retitle -1 RFS: tinydb/3.2.0-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The package should use Python 3, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
If the package contains only a Python module, it should be packaged as a
module, including the package name.
Pri
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Please don't build the Python 2 module, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
${shlibs:Depends} for -dev packages does nothing and the
Control: retitle -1 RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Please use Priority: optional.
CONTRIBUTION.pdf should be removed from the orig tarball as it doesn't
have a source and I doubt is even free (actually license texts we ship are
also non-free,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please use the automatic debug packages.
The debian revision for an initial upload should be -1.
Please update Standards-Version to the current version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
debian/copyright lacks Source and Upstream-Name.
Please disable DH_VE
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please use the automatic debug packages.
The debian revision for an initial upload should be -1.
Please update Standards-Version to the current version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
debian/copyright lacks Source and Upstream-Name.
Please disable DH_VE
Why is this aimed at experimental?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:49:46PM -0400, Sanford Rockowitz wrote:
> 2) IIRC, I was forced to increment the Debian release by debain-mentors. A
> failed submission "used up" a debian release number and blocked a corrected
> submission with the same release number. Is there some way around this?
m
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please either add check to B-D to enable tests or explicitly disable them
in debian/rules.
I don't think yazc should be in the libs section.
Explicit Depends: libzc3 in yazc is not needed.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
Please update Standards-Version t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please remove all unneeded files from debian/.
Please remove commented out sample lines from debian/rules.
You shouldn't "Bump Debian release for debian-mentors". Please remove all
changelog entries (both old upstream ones and recent bumps) and add oe
correct entry.
Ple
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please don't put additional changes in the initial changelog entry.
Contents of README.Debian looks like a package description and should be
moved there.
You shouldn't override source-is-missing for files in the orig tarball.
Remove them from there if they are not used.
Control: owner -1 !
I think docs should be in -dev, especially as they are about 600 KB whils
the .so is 260 Kb.
Otherwise the package looks good.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: retitle -1 RFS: jpcre2/10.30.01-2 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please fix the lintian warnings.
Don't put the upstream changelog into the debian/changelog entry.
You should always use -1 as a debian revision for the initial upload.
make distclean should be in a dh_auto_clean override
Control: owner -1 !
Please bump Standards-Version to the current version and I'll upload it.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 03:32:48AM +0600, Md Jahidul Hamid wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Fix for infinite loop (Closes: #861180)
I don't think it's the only change as the last upload is 3.8.9b-1 and this
version is 3.9.4-4. It seems you've made the
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 05:55:51AM +0200, erana wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package koboldsquest. It has been
> duploaded and is also available at http://erana.yellowcouch.org/debian/
Duploaded where?
And the second link doesn't have source packages.
Plea
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The version is incorrect for a NMU, and I lintian even tells you that.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Roger Kalt wrote:
> I search for a new sponsor for package elog:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/elog
>
> There are two versions to sponsor right now:
> 1: 2.9.2+2014.05.11git44800a7-2+deb8u2 for jessie-pu --> see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> .shlibs
> (which is mentioned, but not documented in the dh_makeshlibs manpage) --
deb-shlibs(5)
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-shlibdeps
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
What does file(1) return for this file?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:26:37AM +0100, Ken Williams wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
This is not an RFS thus closing it.
> It just generates random bingo numbers, and includes a check screen
>
> It's all extremely simple, and only comprises one small short Python
> file, so all the c
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:49:42AM -0500, Simon Quigley wrote:
> What's the reasoning for debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp ?
See lintian-info -t debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
> I see jquery.js in the files that are installed in the package.
No, it's a symlink.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:09:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:26:46PM +0800, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
> Thanks for providing the information.
> Title is fixed. The original maintainer of this orphaned package is
> included in the mail receivers.
Please also fix the title of #866873 (and please don't top-post).
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.a
It's usually not a good idea to make an upload just to update the
maintainer name, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#adopting
and
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3
for the actual procedures.
You've also got the RFS title wrong, please read the template mo
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:56:52AM +, John Horigan wrote:
> When I upload my package contextfree to mentors.debian.net, in the QA
> information I get this:
> A watch file is present but doesn't work
> -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
> -- Found watchfile in ./debian
> -- Scan finished
>
> My wa
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 04:40:06PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> However, there is a remaining issue:
You've missed the suggestion for that one.
It basically says "do the same change".
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:38:24PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> I've imported a source package into git using gbp import-orig --uscan,
> then updated the changelog with gbp dch and then made a lot of changes
> (and commited them). Now I added a file to Files-Excluded: in
> debian/copyright- but whe
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:11:22PM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Okay, I didn't want that this lintian error affected Depends and/or
> Recommends too:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/depends-on-build-essential-package-without-using-version.html
Have you read the tag description? It says you don't
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 06:07:40PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> some tests are skipped, i feel they should run
>
>
> perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?
>
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1 if=/dev/zero
> of=/tmp/usbguard_disk
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:56:12AM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> i'm in the process of upgrading usbguard to 0.7. In the new upstream
> usbguard-daemon.conf there are the folder
> /etc/usbguard/IPCAccessControl.d/ and the file
> /var/log/usbguard/usbguard-audit.log specified. I'm not sure what's the
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:52:17AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> xe its not an emulator package name?
There is no such package, no.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:08:41PM +0200, erana wrote:
> To help out debian I would like to maintain 2 packages : koboldsquest and
> isle-of-evermeet. These have been uploaded and packaged to the anonymous
> debian upload ftp server and are also available at
> http://erana.yellowcouch.org/debian/
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I'm looking for some ancient versions to be installed from bootable
> disc/CD/etc.:
>
> 3.0 woody
> 2.1 slink
> 2.0 hamm
> 1.3 bo
> 1.2 rex
> 1.1 buzz
>
> Does anybody where can I download installable ISOs from?
http://cdimage.debia
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:54:08AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due if some one are working
> on sometihing..
Is http://snapshot.debian.org/ not enough for your tasks?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The build log says:
E: dh_python3 dh_python3:176: no package to act on (python3-foo or one with
${python3:Depends} in Depends)
Start with fixing this.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * New upstream release.
> * New major version is 10
> * New maintainer email address
> * Fixes a low level vulnerability for buffer overflow when loading a
> malformed temporary DH file
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:25:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > James Clarke wrote in https://bugs.debian.org/853886#10:
> >
> > "For source-only builds, I don't understand why you would want to
> > perform the build in a chroot.
>
> Since Build-Depends are requested on my local machine anyway
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:46:15PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 1. Could anybody please have a look at the automake stuff to
> enable the build of the generic lib in addition to the other
> two. I tried several switches but failed. :-(
There is no generic lib support in the build scri
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:46:15PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I've started packaging Phylogenetic Likelihood Library[1]. Since it
> makes heavy use of amd64 features it comes with specific support of AVX
> and SSE3. My plan is to provide binary packages amd64 only named
> libpll-avx1 and libpl
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 01:56:26PM -0600, Jason Crain wrote:
> > > The upstream xpdf source contains a file misc/hello.pdf for testing
> > > purposes, according to the INSTALL file. It would likely need to be
> > > repacked to remove that file.
> >
> > What's the problem with that file? It is not
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:36:51AM +0100, p...@reseau-libre.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently starting the packaging of the ftpsync tool, and some of the
> binaries are for internal purpose of the ftpsync tool only. They should not,
> as a consequence, be deployed in /usr/(s)bin.
>
> the FHS say
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:01:55AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Secondly, you should revert the compat change in order to be sure of
> getting a freeze exception for the fix of the important bug.
Too late, as the previous wxmaxima upload was done after the freeze.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Des
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Hello, how can I find somebody that can includes this software to Debian
> official?
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > > > With all packages already existing in testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand this rea
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:41:13AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > With all packages already existing in testing.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand this really...
> > What part
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:29:02AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > should I wait with them?
> > With all packages already existing in testing.
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand this really...
What part of it? The reasons writ
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:18:44AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > However, are you sure you want this uploaded to unstable during freeze? It
> > will make it really unpleasant to fix anything targetted at stretch; and
> > also make the Release Team unhappy. You don't want them unhappy.
> >
> >
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:31:58PM +0100, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> in my attempt to package sbt, I have a multi components debian source
> package. One of this upstream source tarball provides a source jar file,
> which will be used to produce a jar file later on by the build process.
> Is it poss
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Sorry; I used DuckDuckGo.
> I had seen that page,
Yet you said "I don't find any documentation about this message"
> but didn't identify which paragraphs is referred to.
The description mentions words "Please also look if..."
--
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:26:02AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I (only) created the file "debian/ntfsundelete-tree.8" (without
> referring it anywhere), and I get this Lintian warning:
> W: ntfsundelete-tree: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/ntfsundelete-tree
>
> Where do I need to register the m
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> And I don't find any documentation about this message.
lintian-info -t
Or you could google it and find
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate.html
which is the same thing.
--
WBR, wRAR
signat
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:04:12AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> This pkg is removed from testing on Jan. 14th [0].
> So it means even after fixing the FTBFS, it cannot go back to testing again?
Yes, until the stretch release.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:33:08AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Team upload.
>
> [ Paul Tagliamonte ]
> * Use a secure transport for the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URL
>
> [ Roger Shimizu ]
> * debian/control:
> - Update Build-Depends on golang-
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 07:29:21PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Another warning I don't know how to solve in GitLab:
> "dpkg-buildpackage: warning: debian/rules is not executable; fixing that"
> I don't find in GitLab CMS the way to set executable bit to a file.
You are expected to set that bit on
501 - 600 of 1104 matches
Mail list logo
