On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 10:56:43AM +0200, Steffen Nissen wrote:
Files:
1757f49ec7042da8d3ecaa183daafc27 512 - optional libfann1_1.1.0-1.dsc
[...]
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Thanks, but dpkg-dev is already the newest version (I am using testing),
should I get it from
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:16:37PM +0200, Simon MARTIN wrote:
have I made a mistake in the way I've postet my question?
Are there any further informations required?
I'd be really thankful for any notes.
Could you please put your packages somewhere on the web?
So we could download it and
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact.
What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to
upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
Just use the control interface
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact.
What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to
upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
Just use the control interface
Hello.
I've got question related to closing bugs.
Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version
I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version.
Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it, and he pointed me out some
other needed changes. So I made
Hello.
I've got question related to closing bugs.
Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version
I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version.
Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it, and he pointed me out some
other needed changes. So I made
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:26:04PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
- The program is packaged as Debian native. This shouldn't be, it should
have an orig.tar.gz and a diff.gz.
I wonder if it would be good idea to add some tests to lintian/linda
about it?
I often make similar mistakes... I make
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:32:01PM +0200, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
I'm looking for a sponsorship of plogd package:
[...]
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225143
Download: http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/p/plogd/
First of all I'm not DD so I
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
Currently supported protocols include SMTP, IMAP, HTTP, TCP, UDP, NNTP, and
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http://www.sysmon.org/
Well as far as I remember Policy doesn't describe it.
It's mentioned
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225143
Download: http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/p/plogd/
First of all I'm not DD so I could be wrong but:
* try to build this package and check
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:22:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
both on this ML
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
Currently supported protocols include SMTP, IMAP, HTTP, TCP, UDP, NNTP, and
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http://www.sysmon.org/
Well as far as I remember Policy doesn't describe it.
It's mentioned
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225143
Download: http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/p/plogd/
First of all I'm not DD so I could be wrong but:
* try to build this package and check
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:22:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
both on this ML
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for newly created package starfighter.
Starfighter is 2D scrolling shooter game with the following features:
o 26 missions over 4 star systems
o Primary and Secondary Weapons (including a laser cannon and a charge weapon)
o A weapon powerup system
o Wingmates
o
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for newly created package starfighter.
Starfighter is 2D scrolling shooter game with the following features:
o 26 missions over 4 star systems
o Primary and Secondary Weapons (including a laser cannon and a charge weapon)
o A weapon powerup system
o Wingmates
o
Hello.
CannonSmash was maintained by Wolfgang Sourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED].
However he orphaned[1] this package some time ago.
I would like to adopt it. I prepared my own packages[2], and I'm looking
for sponsor for them.
I resolved one outstanding bug[3]. This could save some space on
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:35:28PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
Here's the original posting:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200302/msg00287.html
That is one weird bot.
Unfortunatelly this makes such messages very hard to clasify as spam
with software :(
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:35:28PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
Here's the original posting:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200302/msg00287.html
That is one weird bot.
Unfortunatelly this makes such messages very hard to clasify as spam
with software :(
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:58:28PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
qt3-designer: usr/share/applnk/Development/designer-qt3.desktop
rhythmbox: usr/share/applications/rhythmbox.desktop
pppoeconf: usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/pppoeconf.desktop
texmacs:
Hello.
Because I didn't find any sponsors last time, I've decided to made some
webpage with packages that I am looking sponsor for[1].
Therefore here I only describe those packages shortly:
netwox - network utilities[2]
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
siefs -
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
There is a discrepancy between the .orig.tar.gz available on your
website and the one listed in the .dsc
Files:
1f11039b70a20db4edf0a5c1e6819f48 357758
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:58:28PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
qt3-designer: usr/share/applnk/Development/designer-qt3.desktop
rhythmbox: usr/share/applications/rhythmbox.desktop
pppoeconf: usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/pppoeconf.desktop
texmacs:
Hello.
Because I didn't find any sponsors last time, I've decided to made some
webpage with packages that I am looking sponsor for[1].
Therefore here I only describe those packages shortly:
netwox - network utilities[2]
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
siefs -
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
otak - text-based visual interface for commandline programs[3]
There is a discrepancy between the .orig.tar.gz available on your
website and the one listed in the .dsc
Files:
1f11039b70a20db4edf0a5c1e6819f48 357758
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I searched
wrongly, then tell me where can I find it.
I tried to check some packages to find how do they
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for package otak.
It's a visual interface for commandline programs. It can be used as
abook replacement if you use it with mutt, but it's not limited only to
that application.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: otak
Version : 1.3.4
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I searched
wrongly, then tell me where can I find it.
I tried to check some packages to find how do they
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for package otak.
It's a visual interface for commandline programs. It can be used as
abook replacement if you use it with mutt, but it's not limited only to
that application.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: otak
Version : 1.3.4
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package netwox.
Netwox is very powerful utility combained with many small
sub-utilities[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwox
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constantin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL :
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
running
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my another package netwag.
Netwag is a graphical frontend for netwox, which is
very powerful network utility combined with many small
sub-utilities[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwag
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package netwox.
Netwox is very powerful utility combained with many small
sub-utilities[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwox
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constantin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL :
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:14:22AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Well I thought about it, but this doesn't solve every my doubt.
How could I name this package? Are there any policies about it?
What if next version occures? How to solve it?
Upstream maintainer answered me, and he told,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:30:13AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
libnetwibab-dev ? what's that suffix ab ?
I made libnetwib-dev now.
It was part of the name of the static lib quoted in your previous email.
If it's not supposed to be part of the lib name, then yes, amend the
package name
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:53:21PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package libnetwib.
Here goes relevant information:
===
* Package name: libnetwib libnetwib
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I would say link it in
static. Problem solved.
I made
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 11:14:22AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Well I thought about it, but this doesn't solve every my doubt.
How could I name this package? Are there any policies about it?
What if next version occures? How to solve it?
Upstream maintainer answered me, and he told,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I would say link it in
static. Problem solved.
I made
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I would like to package some very useful set of utilities[1].
It depends on library of the same author[2].
Unfortunatelly SONAME of this library changes with every new version.
And to make this problem more annoying, new
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I would say link it in
static. Problem solved.
Hello.
I would like to package some very useful set of utilities[1].
It depends on library of the same author[2].
Unfortunatelly SONAME of this library changes with every new version.
And to make this problem more annoying, new releases shows very often
(about one version per two weeks).
And
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I would like to package some very useful set of utilities[1].
It depends on library of the same author[2].
Unfortunatelly SONAME of this library changes with every new version.
And to make this problem more annoying, new
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I would say link it in
static. Problem solved.
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: buildtool
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Julio M. Merino Vidal jmmv AT hispabsd.org
* URL : http://buildtool.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:40:19AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
It is related with #210951 [1]
If someone is interested in sponsoring this package for me, package can
be downloaded from my website[2].
I'm not Debian developer yet, but almost ;) [3]
I forgot to say that package
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: buildtool
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Julio M. Merino Vidal jmmv AT hispabsd.org
* URL : http://buildtool.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:40:19AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
It is related with #210951 [1]
If someone is interested in sponsoring this package for me, package can
be downloaded from my website[2].
I'm not Debian developer yet, but almost ;) [3]
I forgot to say that package
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:03:15AM +0100, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
Hi, my packages (ttf-isabella and alleyoop) are now available with
unstable but the wnpp bug reports are still open. The bug reports are:
#190317, #208916 and #207153
[...]
Am I doing something wrong?
I suppose you've
Hello.
I would like to find sponsor for my package which fixes two outstanding
bugs:
#239620: makeself: wrongly set architecture header
Severity: *serious*
#239614: makeself - Description improvement
Severity: minor
Here goes rest of relevant information:
Package : makeself
Hello.
RFU means request for upload. Why am I asking for it?
Well, I screwed my package up :/
It should has architecture set to all, but has any right now :/
Results are pretty obvious... it takes time of autobuilders, and wastes
some space on mirrors and Debian's servers.
It's a shell script,
Hello.
RFU means request for upload. Why am I asking for it?
Well, I screwed my package up :/
It should has architecture set to all, but has any right now :/
Results are pretty obvious... it takes time of autobuilders, and wastes
some space on mirrors and Debian's servers.
It's a shell script,
Hello.
I would like to package SieFS (virtual filesystem for accessing memory
of Siemens mobiles). It's related to #238314
It depends on FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace), which is distributed in
Debian as source file which should be compiled by users.
And now I'm pretty confused... how could I
Hello.
I would like to package SieFS (virtual filesystem for accessing memory
of Siemens mobiles). It's related to #238314
It depends on FUSE (Filesystem in USErspace), which is distributed in
Debian as source file which should be compiled by users.
And now I'm pretty confused... how could I
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:42:53AM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I will give it a try
this evening or tomorrow. If its fine I will be happy to sponsor you, if
not you have to fix the problems :).
Well, sorry for hurring up you, but I'm
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:53:03PM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
Well, sorry for hurring up you, but I'm just too excited with whole
packaging stuff, and Debian as well ;)
I probably have to many time for Debian, and every hour is an eternity
for me ;)
Lucky for you. My day's are obscenely
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:42:53AM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I will give it a try
this evening or tomorrow. If its fine I will be happy to sponsor you, if
not you have to fix the problems :).
Well, sorry for hurring up you, but I'm
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
Ok, nevermind. Thanks for reading it ;)
You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
Ok, nevermind. Thanks for reading it ;)
You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I will be very thankful if someone of you kindly upload this package.
It's related with #215783.
Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
builders will be helpful with porting it to another
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I will be very thankful if someone of you kindly upload this package.
It's related with #215783.
Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
builders will be helpful with porting it to another
Hello everyone.
I'm looking for sponsor for my package(s) netpanzer.
It consists with two packages: netpanzer and netpanzer-data.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: netpanzer
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Authors: Matthias Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:43:13PM +0100, GCS wrote:
However, a few nits to pick...
- please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian
policy requires this.
Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages
after build, as now I get:
gpg:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:09:17PM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias
to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'.
Do you know that you can have a ~/.devscripts config file with a
DEBSIGN_KEYID=... option? Take a look at the
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:11:04PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias
to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'.
You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -kkeyid`
Or you can sign them after building with debsign
Hello everyone.
I'm looking for sponsor for my package(s) netpanzer.
It consists with two packages: netpanzer and netpanzer-data.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: netpanzer
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Authors: Matthias Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:43:13PM +0100, GCS wrote:
However, a few nits to pick...
- please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian
policy requires this.
Done. I just wonder if there's a way for automatic signing the packages
after build, as now I get:
gpg:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:09:17PM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias
to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'.
Do you know that you can have a ~/.devscripts config file with a
DEBSIGN_KEYID=... option? Take a look at the
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:11:04PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias
to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'.
You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -kkeyid`
Or you can sign them after building with debsign
Hello.
I'm packaging makeself[1] for Debian (#200151).
I've got the followoing errors/warnings:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~/nowy$lintian makeself_2.1.2-1_i386.changes
E: makeself: binary-without-manpage makeself
W: makeself: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/lib/makeself/makeself-header
([EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:58:10PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I'm packaging makeself[1] for Debian (#200151).
I've got the followoing errors/warnings:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~/nowy$lintian makeself_2.1.2-1_i386.changes
E: makeself: binary-without-manpage makeself
W: makeself:
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name : makeself
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Stphane Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.megastep.org/makeself/
* License : GPL
Description
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:22:27PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I can sponsor it. I'll check it and then I'll upload it.
That's great!
Thank you very much. If something is wrong, then tell me about it and
I'll made proper changes.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feski aka fEnIo |
Hello.
I'm packaging makeself[1] for Debian (#200151).
I've got the followoing errors/warnings:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~/nowy$lintian makeself_2.1.2-1_i386.changes
E: makeself: binary-without-manpage makeself
W: makeself: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/lib/makeself/makeself-header
([EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:58:10PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I'm packaging makeself[1] for Debian (#200151).
I've got the followoing errors/warnings:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~/nowy$lintian makeself_2.1.2-1_i386.changes
E: makeself: binary-without-manpage makeself
W: makeself:
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name : makeself
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Stéphane Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.megastep.org/makeself/
* License : GPL
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:22:27PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I can sponsor it. I'll check it and then I'll upload it.
That's great!
Thank you very much. If something is wrong, then tell me about it and
I'll made proper changes.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feński aka fEnIo |
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 08:52:44AM +0100, Frank Kster wrote:
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello.
Is it possible to run Sid chrooted environment on Woody?
I've tried to do it with pbuilder, but unfortunatelly I've failed :/
Firstly, debootstrap had too old /usr
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:21:47AM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
[...cut...]
Ok, I've made it. Works fine, but I had to use statically linked shell
with tar support. Probably some inconsistency between glibc and
libpthreads.
Thanks everyone for help.
regards
fEnIo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:21:47AM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
[...cut...]
Ok, I've made it. Works fine, but I had to use statically linked shell
with tar support. Probably some inconsistency between glibc and
libpthreads.
Thanks everyone for help.
regards
fEnIo
Hello.
Is it possible to run Sid chrooted environment on Woody?
I've tried to do it with pbuilder, but unfortunatelly I've failed :/
Firstly, debootstrap had too old /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid
script, so I've changed it to the proper script from Sid.
Then I've got segfault while
Hello.
Is it possible to run Sid chrooted environment on Woody?
I've tried to do it with pbuilder, but unfortunatelly I've failed :/
Firstly, debootstrap had too old /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid
script, so I've changed it to the proper script from Sid.
Then I've got segfault while
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:07:25PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
I am not sure if I am on the right mailing-list.
Probably right.
I have written a binary clock for text mode.
It is available on
http://www.ngolde.de
There is a debian package too.
How can this program placed in the debian
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:07:25PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
I am not sure if I am on the right mailing-list.
Probably right.
I have written a binary clock for text mode.
It is available on
http://www.ngolde.de
There is a debian package too.
How can this program placed in the debian
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Raphael Goulais wrote:
Thanks for quick answer.
you're welcome :)
;)
BTW why this document isn't included in mentioned page?
I think this is because the policy is still a draft. Hence, it is not
fully official. There's a debian-python group you
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Raphael Goulais wrote:
Thanks for quick answer.
you're welcome :)
;)
BTW why this document isn't included in mentioned page?
I think this is because the policy is still a draft. Hence, it is not
fully official. There's a debian-python group you
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Tom wrote:
Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive
sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading
manually?
Check http://mentors.debian.net service. It's designed for such
purposes. You can create an
Hello.
Is there somewhere any Python Policy?
Or any advices/hints how to package Python program properly?
Or maybe I should follow Perl Policy with proper changes depending on
Python?
I'll be thankful for every links, hints ;)
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feski aka fEnIo |
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Tom wrote:
Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive
sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading
manually?
Check http://mentors.debian.net service. It's designed for such
purposes. You can create an
Hello.
Is there somewhere any Python Policy?
Or any advices/hints how to package Python program properly?
Or maybe I should follow Perl Policy with proper changes depending on
Python?
I'll be thankful for every links, hints ;)
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feński aka fEnIo |
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:12:02PM +0100, Raphael Goulais wrote:
Is there somewhere any Python Policy?
Or any advices/hints how to package Python program properly?
In the python package ... /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.html is a
directory containing the policy.
Doh... I've searched it
Hello.
I've got problem with pbuilder. Whenever I try to build package it fails.
Maybe some example:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])/home/fenio/potrace#pbuilder build potrace_1.2-1_i386.changes
[...]
- Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.18
2003/04/20 03:40:36 dancer Exp $
-
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:14:57PM +0100, Michel Dnzer wrote:
I've got problem with pbuilder. Whenever I try to build package it fails.
Maybe some example:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])/home/fenio/potrace#pbuilder build potrace_1.2-1_i386.changes
[...]
pbuilder build takes a .dsc file, not
Hello.
I've got problem with pbuilder. Whenever I try to build package it fails.
Maybe some example:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])/home/fenio/potrace#pbuilder build potrace_1.2-1_i386.changes
[...]
- Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.18
2003/04/20 03:40:36 dancer Exp $
-
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 06:43:28PM +0100, blacksheep wrote:
I know I should write some more man pages, but `lintian' says
something more I cannot understand:
E: plml: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/
Try rerun lintian with a -i option. It should tell you more.
It seems
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 06:43:28PM +0100, blacksheep wrote:
I know I should write some more man pages, but `lintian' says
something more I cannot understand:
E: plml: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/
Try rerun lintian with a -i option. It should tell you more.
It seems
Hello.
I am looking for sponsor for libphysfs.
The PhysicsFS filesystem abstraction library provides a simple C
interface to aid game programmers in utilizing game assets packaged in
many different types of archive files.
It is now lintian free (except standard-version). I've removed obsoleted
Hello.
I am looking for sponsor for libphysfs.
The PhysicsFS filesystem abstraction library provides a simple C
interface to aid game programmers in utilizing game assets packaged in
many different types of archive files.
It is now lintian free (except standard-version). I've removed obsoleted
Hello.
I am looking for sponsor for library I've just packaged.
Package: libphysfs0
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Description: filesystem abstraction library for game programmers
The PhysicsFS filesystem abstraction library provides a simple C
interface to aid game programmers in utilizing
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:44:21AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Packages can be found at http://skawina.eu.org/libphysfs/
Package is *almost* lintian free. I can't remove one error:
E: libphysfs0 source: debian-files-list-in-source
I've added `rm -f debian/files` in clean target
201 - 300 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
