cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag

2001-04-02 Thread Chris Ruffin
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpW53pCDhFar.pgp Description: PGP signature

cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag

2001-04-02 Thread Chris Ruffin
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP signature

compilation errors with c++ package

2001-03-24 Thread Chris Ruffin
ith this? I'd really like to package this software but my c++ skills are lacking. Any ideas? The entire source for List.h is attached. -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> #ifndef List_h #define List_h // This file describes the List template-class and some additional stuff // that i

compilation errors with c++ package

2001-03-24 Thread Chris Ruffin
ith this? I'd really like to package this software but my c++ skills are lacking. Any ideas? The entire source for List.h is attached. -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> #ifndef List_h #define List_h // This file describes the List template-class and some additional stuf

Unidentified subject!

2001-02-18 Thread Chris Ruffin
mpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `in_addr_t' /home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40: warning: data definition has no type or storage class which makes me think that it isn't picking up netinet/in.h correctly, or so

Unidentified subject!

2001-02-18 Thread Chris Ruffin
mpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `in_addr_t' /home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40: warning: data definition has no type or storage class which makes me think that it isn't picking up netinet/in.h correctly, or so

config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Chris Ruffin
Should source archives include config.cache? I wouldn't think so, but if we're all using Debian systems then things will all be installed in the right places, so it would be okay. Comments? -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgp7KvOqaSRtM.pgp Description: PGP signature

config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Chris Ruffin
Should source packages include config.cache? I don't think so, but I'm not absolutely sure. -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpU9vwcDsFvZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Chris Ruffin
Should source archives include config.cache? I wouldn't think so, but if we're all using Debian systems then things will all be installed in the right places, so it would be okay. Comments? -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP signature

config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Chris Ruffin
Should source packages include config.cache? I don't think so, but I'm not absolutely sure. -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP signature

Re: packages not in testing

2001-01-14 Thread Chris Ruffin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 06:01:32PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > Chris Ruffin wrote: > > Did you track this down? I had a look yesterday and then > got onto other things and didn't reply. electric depends on > lesstif1 and there is a problem with that on m68k. I don't

Re: packages not in testing

2001-01-14 Thread Chris Ruffin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 06:01:32PM -0800, Rick Younie wrote: > Chris Ruffin wrote: > > Did you track this down? I had a look yesterday and then > got onto other things and didn't reply. electric depends on > lesstif1 and there is a problem with that on m68k. I don't

packages not in testing

2001-01-13 Thread Chris Ruffin
c is the package I'm really concerned about. I uploaded it to the old woody tree, and it was accecpted. But the package won't go into testing, and gives the following in update_excuses: electric 6.00-1 (new) (low) Maintainer: Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> electric has be

packages not in testing

2001-01-13 Thread Chris Ruffin
ctric is the package I'm really concerned about. I uploaded it to the old woody tree, and it was accecpted. But the package won't go into testing, and gives the following in update_excuses: electric 6.00-1 (new) (low) Maintainer: Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> electric has be